Cited by 11Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Feasibility pilot of a brief mindfulness intervention for college students with posttraumatic stress symptoms and problem drinking

Open access
Valenstein-Mah, Helen, Simpson, Tracy L., Bowen, Sarah, Enkema, Matt C., Bird, Elizabeth R., In Cho, Hye, Larimer, Mary E.·2019·Mindfulness

Abstract

Objective A significant subset of college students experience PTSD symptoms, and many engage in problematic alcohol use. Some college students with PTSD symptoms may use alcohol and other substances to cope with their symptoms, and those with PTSD experience more negative alcohol and drug consequences than those without PTSD. Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs) have been successfully utilized for individuals with PTSD or substance use disorders. However, to date, no studies have evaluated MBIs for college students with co-occurring PTSD symptoms and problem drinking.Method This study was a feasibility pilot of a 4-week group loving-kindness meditation (LKM) intervention, a practice of intentionally directing well wishes to oneself and others. LKM was compared to referral to treatment as usual (RTAU) for non-treatment seeking college students (N=75) with PTSD symptoms and problem drinking.Results Overall, the LKM group had low to moderate feasibility and acceptability among college students, as recruitment was lower than expected and attendance at LKM groups was modest. Participants' PTSD symptoms, drinking quantity, and negative drinking consequences decreased, and state mindfulness increased over the course of the study, but there were no significant differences between LKM and RTAU on these outcomes. Additionally, higher coping drinking motives predicted greater PTSD symptoms and more drinking consequences over the course of the study.Conclusions Effective interventions for college students with PTSD symptoms and problematic alcohol use are needed, especially for individuals who drink to cope with their PTSD symptoms. Future research on LKM that addresses the limitations of the current study is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-018-1077-y

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Valenstein-Mah et al. reported an effect size between 0.23 and 0.88, suggesting a low to high effect of mindfulness intervention on reducing PTSD symptoms and alcohol consumption; limitations include smaller than expected sample size and limited assessment of alcohol consumption.

    “Valenstein-Mah et al. [40]: An effect size between 0.23 and 0.88 is reported, suggesting a low to high effect of Mindfulness intervention on reducing post-traumatic stress symptoms and alcohol consumption among young adults. However, limitations such as the smaller than expected sample size and limited assessment of alcohol consumption may influence the generalizability of the results.”

    From Third-Generation Therapies for the Management of Psychoactive Substance Use in Young People: Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [40]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The effects of third-generation therapies demonstrate greater long-term efficacy than immediate post-treatment improvements, indicating that benefits may continue to increase after treatment ends.

    “In this context, it has been shown that the effects of third-generation therapies demonstrate greater long-term efficacy than immediate post-treatment improvements, indicating that the benefits of these interventions may continue to increase even after the treatment ends [36,40].”

    From Third-Generation Therapies for the Management of Psychoactive Substance Use in Young People: Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Results (Impact of intervention on PTSD symptoms) report that PTSD symptoms decreased at each assessment through the one-month follow-up. But the Discussion (Efficacy) says reductions also occurred in the comparison group and that the mindfulness intervention showed no greater benefit at post-treatment or follow-up. The paper therefore does not establish greater long-term efficacy for third-generation therapies than immediate post-treatment improvement. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many studies used small samples, limiting statistical power and generalizability, and short-term interventions and limited follow-ups make it challenging to evaluate sustainability of therapeutic effects.

    “Another limitation relates to sample sizes and intervention durations. Many studies utilized small samples, limiting statistical power and the generalizability of results, as observed in Nguyen et al. [41] and Valenstein-Mah et al. [40]. Short-term interventions and limited follow-ups also make it challenging to evaluate the sustainability of therapeutic effects over time.”

    From Third-Generation Therapies for the Management of Psychoactive Substance Use in Young People: Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [40]

    In Discussion > Limitations and future directions (page unavailable), the paper says its smaller-than-anticipated sample reduced power to detect differences between conditions. Discussion > Efficacy and Results (pages unavailable) describe a four-week intervention and a one-month follow-up. The paper does not establish that many studies share these limitations or explicitly assess whether effects are sustainable over time; it also does not link its sample size to generalizability. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2015). National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Retrieved from: www.samhsa.gov. 29792622

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valenstein-Mah, H., Simpson, T. L., Bowen, S., Enkema, M. C., Bird, E. R., In Cho, H., & Larimer, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Pacific University Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Valenstein-Mah, Helen
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2019-01-07
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
1255-1268
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2908859536
Cited by
11
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (F31AA023420-01A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, post-traumatic stress disorder, problem drinking, university students, state mindfulness, feasibility and acceptability, brief intervention, substance use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review