Cited by 41Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Mindfulness-based interventions for addictive behaviors: implementation issues on the road ahead

Open access
Wilson, Adam D., Roos, Corey R., Robinson, Charles S., Stein, Elena R., Manuel, Jacob A., Enkema, Matthew C., Bowen, Sarah, Witkiewitz, Katie·2017·Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Over the past 35 years, mindfulness meditation practices have increasingly been integrated into Western medical settings. Research into the benefits of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) continues to expand, such that there are currently more than a dozen different protocolled MBIs for patients suffering from a variety of physical and psychological disorders. In the last decade, a number of MBIs specifically designed to treat addictive behaviors have been developed and tested. This review first provides a brief overview of the current state of the science with respect to the efficacy of MBIs for addictive behaviors, and some of the proposed mechanisms underlying the efficacy of MBIs. Second, the review highlights unresolved implementation issues and provides suggestions for how future research can address the implementation challenges to advance the delivery of MBIs. Specifically, this review focuses on the lack of clear empirical guidelines in the following areas: (a) effective training for MBI treatment providers; (b) adaptations of the traditional 2-hr closed-cohort group format; (c) delivery of MBIs in 1-on-1 treatment contexts; (d) delivery of MBIs at different points in the change process; (e) delivery of MBIs via technology-based platforms; and (f) facilitation of precision medicine in the delivery of MBIs. Specific research directions are suggested with an eye toward a meaningful increase in access to MBIs for front-line clinicians and clients. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/adb0000319

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a significant evidence gap in LMICs regarding the feasibility of implementing MBRP in more diverse or real-world treatment contexts.

    “Therefore, there is a significant evidence gap in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) regarding the feasibility of implementing MBRP in more diverse or “real-world” treatment contexts (16).”

    From A mindfulness-based intervention for Substance Use Disorder in a Brazilian vulnerable population: a feasibility mixed method study (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Key Implementation Issues section identifies gaps in evaluating MBRP in flexible formats and says further research will inform whether rolling-admission MBRP is feasible in diverse real-world treatment settings. It does not identify LMICs as the setting for that evidence gap, so the geographic qualification is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bowen S Chawla N Marlatt GA 2010 Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for substance use disorders: A clinician’s guide New York, NY Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, A. D., Roos, C. R., Robinson, C. S., Stein, E. R., Manuel, J. A., Enkema, M. C., Bowen, S., & Witkiewitz, K.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Pacific University (IN)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Published
2017-12
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
888-896
ISSN
  • 0893-164X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1501
OpenAlex
W2765487234
Cited by
41
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (T32 AA018108, R21 AA024926)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, addictive behavior, addiction treatment, implementation barriers, individual psychotherapy, stages of change, precision medicine, access to treatment
MeSH terms
Humans, Behavior, Addictive, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Precision Medicine, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review