Cited by 117Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and Diet

An intervention study targeting energy and nutrient intake in worksite cafeterias

Open access
Lowe, Michael R., Tappe, Karyn A., Butryn, Meghan L., Annunziato, Rachel A., Coletta, Maria C., Ochner, Christopher N., Rolls, Barbara J.·2010·Eating Behaviors

Abstract

Modifying the food environment is a promising strategy for promoting healthier eating behavior. This study aimed to evaluate nutritional and weight changes in a program that used worksite cafeterias to reduce employees' calorie content of purchased foods and improve their macronutrient intake. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: 1) only environmental change (i.e., the introduction of 10 new low-energy-density (ED) foods and provision of labels for all foods sold at lunch, which listed ED, calories, and macronutrient content) or 2) the environmental change plus pricing incentives for purchasing low-ED foods and education about low-ED eating delivered in four, 1-hour group sessions. Participant lunch choices were monitored electronically at the point of purchase for 3 months before the intervention was instituted (i.e., the baseline period) and for 3 months afterward (i.e., intervention period). Participants were adults (n=96, BMI=29.7+/-6.0 kg/m(2)) who regularly ate lunch at their workplace cafeteria. There was no difference between groups in total energy intake over the study period. Across groups, energy and percent of energy from fat decreased and percent of energy from carbohydrate increased from baseline to the intervention period (all p<.01). Follow-up analyses, conducted by averaging Baseline Months 1 and 2 and comparing them to Intervention Month 3 as a conservative estimate of overall impact of the intervention, indicated that change in energy, carbohydrate, and fat intake remained significant (p<.001). Providing nutrition labels and reducing the ED of selected foods was associated with improved dietary intake.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2010.01.002

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A combined environmental and labeling intervention, adding healthier options while also labeling calories, energy density, and macronutrients on all foods sold in a worksite cafeteria, led to a reduction in total calories consumed at lunch.

    “A combined environmental and labeling intervention, both adding healthier options while also labeling calories, energy density, and macronutrients on all foods sold in a worksite cafeteria, led to a reduction in total calories consumed at lunch.112”
  • In a small quasi-experimental study in a worksite cafeteria, compared with environmental changes (adding healthy options, food labels), the further addition of small pricing incentives and nutrition education did not further alter food purchases.

    “In a small quasi-experimental study in a worksite cafeteria, compared with environmental changes (adding healthy options, food labels), the further addition of small pricing incentives and nutrition education did not further alter food purchases.112”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lowe, M. R., Tappe, K. A., Butryn, M. L., Annunziato, R. A., Coletta, M. C., Ochner, C. N., & Rolls, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lowe, Michael R.
Venue
Eating Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
144-151
ISSN
1471-0153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131261495
Cited by
117
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eating Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL073775)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
worksite cafeterias, food environment, energy density, nutrition labeling, pricing incentives, macronutrient intake, dietary fat intake, carbohydrate intake, energy intake, weight change
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Food Labeling, Food Preferences, Food Services, Health Education, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Body Mass Index, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review