Cited by 130COVID-19 and Mental HealthDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

The effect of COVID-19 isolation measures on the cognition and mental health of people living with dementia: a rapid systematic review of one year of quantitative evidence

Open access
Suárez-González, Aida, Rajagopalan, Jayeeta, Livingston, Gill, Alladi, Suvarna·2021·EClinicalMedicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background COVID-19 prevention and control policies have entailed lockdowns and confinement. This study aimed to summarize the global research evidence describing the effect of COVID-19 isolation measures on the health of people living with dementia. Methods We searched Pubmed, PsycINFO and CINAHL up to 27th of February 2021 for peer-reviewed quantitative studies about the effects of isolation during COVID-19 on the cognitive, psychological and functional symptoms of people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool was used to conduct the quality assessment. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021229259. Findings 15 eligible papers were identified, examining a total of 6442 people with dementia. 13/15 studies investigated people living in the community and 2 in care homes. Out of 15 studies, 9 (60%) reported changes in cognition and 14 (93%) worsening or new onset of behavioral and psychological symptoms. Six studies (46%) reported a functional decline in daily activities in a variable proportion of the population analyzed. Interpretation COVID-19 isolation measures have damaged the cognitive and mental health of people with dementia across the world. It is urgent to issue guidance that balances infection control measures against the principles of non-maleficence to guarantee fair and appropriate care during pandemic times for this population. Funding ASG receives funding from a grant jointly funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (UK) and the National Institute for Health Research (UK) (ES/S010467/1). GL is supported by UCLH National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, and by NIHR North Thames ARC as a NIHR senior investigator. JR is supported by a UK Research and Innovation's Global Challenges Research Fund (UKRI GCRF) (ES/P0109381).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101047

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A systematic review of social isolation in COVID-19 found 9/15 (60%) studies with 6,442 participants reported worse than expected deterioration in cognition and 14/15 (93%) worsening or new onset of non-cognitive symptoms.

    “A systematic review of the effects of social isolation in COVID-19 found 9/15 (60%) studies with 6,442 participants reported worse than expected deterioration in cognition and 14/15 (93%) worsening or new onset of non-cognitive symptoms. (555)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]A. Comas-Herrera, M. Salcher-Konrad, J. Baumbusch, N. Farina, C. Goodman, K. Lorenz-Dant, L.F. Low. Rapid Review of the Evidence on Impacts of Visiting Policies in Care Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic. (https://ltccovid.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Rapid-review-of-evidence-on-impacts-of-visiting-policies-in-care-homes-during-the-COVID-pandemic-LSE068110.pdf
  2. [8]Suarez-Gonzalez A. Comas-Herrera A. Livingston G. Impact of COVID-19 on people living with dementia: emerging international evidence a, 29 June Rapid Response BMJ 2020 https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2463/rr-0
  3. [14]Suarez-Gonzalez A. Rajagopalan J. Alladi S. A Rapid Review Of The Effect Of Covid-19 Isolation Measures On The Cognitive And Mental Health Of People Living With Dementia 2021 PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021229259 Available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021229259 PMC8342894 34386758

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suárez-González, A., Rajagopalan, J., Livingston, G., & Alladi, S.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
EClinicalMedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
39
Pages
101047
ISSN
2589-5370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3187584555
Cited by
130
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 7
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EClinicalMedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (ES/S010467/1)
  • UCL
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, isolation measures, lockdown, dementia, mild cognitive impairment, cognitive decline, behavioral and psychological symptoms, mental health, functional decline, care homes, community-dwelling people with dementia, non-maleficence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review