Cited by 400Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Neuropsychiatric Symptoms as Predictors of Progression to Severe Alzheimer’s Dementia and Death: The Cache County Dementia Progression Study

Open access
Peters, Matthew E., Schwartz, Sarah, Han, Dingfen, Rabins, Peter V., Steinberg, Martin, Tschanz, Joann T., Lyketsos, Constantine G.·2015·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about factors influencing the rate of progression of Alzheimer's dementia. Using data from the Cache County Dementia Progression Study, the authors examined the link between clinically significant neuropsychiatric symptoms in mild Alzheimer's dementia and progression to severe dementia or death. METHOD: The Cache County Dementia Progression Study is a longitudinal study of dementia progression in incident cases of this condition. Survival analyses included unadjusted Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Hazard ratio estimates controlled for age at dementia onset, dementia duration at baseline, gender, education level, General Medical Health Rating, and apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 genotype. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-five patients with incident Alzheimer's dementia were studied. Sixty-eight (20%) developed severe dementia over the follow-up period. Psychosis (hazard ratio=2.007), agitation/aggression (hazard ratio=2.946), and any one clinically significant neuropsychiatric symptom (domain score ≥4, hazard ratio=2.682) were associated with more rapid progression to severe dementia. Psychosis (hazard ratio=1.537), affective symptoms (hazard ratio=1.510), agitation/aggression (hazard ratio=1.942), mildly symptomatic neuropsychiatric symptoms (domain score of 1-3, hazard ratio=1.448), and clinically significant neuropsychiatric symptoms (hazard ratio=1.951) were associated with earlier death. CONCLUSIONS: Specific neuropsychiatric symptoms are associated with shorter survival time from mild Alzheimer's dementia to severe dementia and/or death. The treatment of specific neuropsychiatric symptoms in mild Alzheimer's dementia should be examined for its potential to delay time to severe dementia or death.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14040480

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The clinical distinction between fvAD and bvFTD has implications for prognosis, treatment, disease progression, and caregiver burden.

    “The appropriate clinical distinction between fvAD and bvFTD has implications for prognosis, treatment, disease progression, and caregiver burden [11–15].”

    From Diagnosing the frontal variant of Alzheimer’s disease: a clinician’s yellow brick road (2017) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that early agitation/aggression in Alzheimer’s dementia predicted accelerated progression and mortality, supporting the general point that symptoms matter for prognosis. The paper does not address the clinical distinction between fvAD and bvFTD or show that making that distinction affects treatment or caregiver burden. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individuals with mild cognitive impairment who also have neuropsychiatric symptoms are at risk of faster progression to dementia.

    “There is some evidence that individuals with mild cognitive impairment who also have neuropsychiatric symptoms are at risk of faster progression to dementia 118 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, M. E., Schwartz, S., Han, D., Rabins, P. V., Steinberg, M., Tschanz, J. T., & Lyketsos, C. G.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lyketsos, Constantine G.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
172
Issue
5
Pages
460-465
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2021809156
Cited by
400
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11
FWCI
19.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01 AG 11380, R01AG011380, R01AG021136, R01AG018712, R01 AG18712, P50AG005146, R01 AG 21136, T32AG027668)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, neuropsychiatric symptoms, dementia progression, psychosis, agitation, aggression, affective symptoms, mortality, advanced dementia, mild dementia, survival analysis, APOE ε4
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Utah, Prevalence, Proportional Hazards Models, Disease Progression, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review