Cited by 24Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchMarine animal studies overview

Environmental and behavioral controls on juvenile Chinook salmon migration pathways in the Columbia River estuary

Open access
Morrice, Katherine J., Baptista, António M., Burke, Brian J.·2020·Ecological Modelling

Abstract

Juvenile Chinook salmon population dynamics in the Columbia River estuary are influenced by physical processes, hatchery practices, and behavioral decision-making. To better understand how environmental forcing and swimming behavior influence estuarine migration and travel times, we developed an individual-based model (IBM) that uses 3-D outputs from a hydrodynamic model to simulate Lagrangian transport as well as swimming and bioenergetics sub-models to simulate active swimming and growth. Simulations were run in 2010 during the migration seasons for yearling and subyearling Chinook salmon. For both life history types, alternative behaviors were simulated, from random walks to behaviors that optimized efficient system migration for yearling Chinook salmon and growth for subyearling Chinook salmon. Simulation results compared well against observed data on travel times and common migration pathways; the simulated travel times for both yearling and subyearling Chinook salmon were within several hours of the observed travel times. In general, residence times and pathways were largely driven by river discharge and the phase of the tide. During periods of greater river discharge, simulated estuarine residence times were reduced and variability across individuals was minimal. The timing of estuarine exit was closely tied to the phase of the tide, with most simulated individuals exiting the system during the ebb phase. While travel times were largely driven by flow velocities, swimming behavior was likewise important. Simulated yearling Chinook salmon behaviors that optimized movement with surrounding flows resulted in reduced estuarine residence times when compared to passive and random walk behaviors. Similarly, simulated subyearling Chinook salmon behaviors that optimized growth directed individuals to shallow peripheral habitats, resulting in longer residence times and higher growth rates. Even if potentially important factors such as predator avoidance were not included, this IBM provides an informative tool to model migration pathways, growth, and residence times of juvenile salmon in an estuarine environment and could be used to inform management decisions by evaluating various scenarios.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109003

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bottom, D.L., Anderson, G., Baptista, A., Burke, J., Burla, M., Bhuthimethee, M., Campbell, L., Casillas, E., Hinton, S., Jacobsen, K., Jay, D., McNatt, R., Moran, P., Roegner, G.C., Simenstad, C.A., Stamatiou, V., Teel, D., Zamon, J.E., 2008. Salmon Life Histories, Habitat, and Food Webs in the Columbia River Estuary: An Overview of Research Results, 2002-2006. pp. 52 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Fish Ecology and Conservation Biology Divisions, Seattle.
  2. Bottom, D.L., Simenstad, C.A., Burke, J., Baptista, A.M., Jay, D.A., Jones, K.K., Casillas, E., 2005. Salmon at river's end: the role of the estuary in the decline and recovery of Columbia River salmon. In: Schiewe, M.H. (Ed.), NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-68.
  3. Fraenkel, G.S., Gunn, D.L., 1940. The Orientation of Animals: Kineses. Taxes and Compass Reactions, Oxford, pp. 352.
  4. Kennedy,, V.S. (Ed.), Estuarine Comparisons. Academic Press, New York, pp. 315-341.
  5. Humston, R., Olson, D.B., Ault, J.S., 2004. Behavioral assumptions in models of fish movement and their influence on population dynamics. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 133, 1304-1328.
  6. Kärnä, T., Baptista, A.M., 2016b. Water Age in the Columbia River Estuary 183. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, pp. 249-259.
  7. Koehler, M.E., Fresh, K.L., Beauchamp, D.A., Cordell, J.R., Simenstad, C.A., Seiler, D.E., 2006. Diet and Bioenergetics of Lake-Rearing Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Lake Washington. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135, 1580-1591.
  8. McNatt, R.A., Bottom, D.L., Hinton, S.A., 2016. Residency and movement of juvenile Chinook salmon at multiple spatial scales in a tidal marsh of the Columbia River estuary. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 145, 774-785.
  9. Myers, J.M., Kope, R.G., Bryant, G.J., Teel, D., Lierheimer, L.J., Wainwright, T.C., Grant, W.S., Waknitz, F.W., Neely, K., Lindley, S.T., 1998. Status Review of Chinook Salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California 35. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC, pp. 443.
  10. Plumb, J.M., Moffitt, C.M., 2015. Re-estimating temperature-dependent consumption parameters in bioenergetics models for juvenile Chinook salmon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 144, 323-330.
  11. Rogers, E., DiMego, G., Black, T., Ek, M., Ferrier, B., Gayno, G., Janjic, Z., Lin, Y., Pyle, M., Wong, V., 2009. The NCEP North American mesoscale modeling system: Recent changes and future plans. In: Preprints, 23rd Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/19th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction.
  12. Simenstad, C.A., Fresh, K.L., Salo, E.O., 1982. The role of Puget Sound and Washington coastal estuaries in the life history of Pacific salmon: an unappreciated function. Estuarine Comparisons. 14. Academic Press, New York, pp. 343-364.
  13. Thornton, K.W., Lessem, A.S., 1978. A temperature algorithm for modifying biological rates. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 107, 284-287.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morrice, K. J., Baptista, A. M., & Burke, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Morrice, Katherine J.
Venue
Ecological Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
427
Pages
109003
ISSN
0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3022181737
Cited by
24
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Modelling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
juvenile Chinook salmon, estuarine migration, migration routes, travel time, estuarine residence time, swimming behavior, bioenergetics, agent-based modeling, Lagrangian transport, river discharge, tidal phase, ebb tide, subyearling salmon, growth optimization, Columbia River estuary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review