Cited by 80Bioenergy crop production and managementSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transport

Soil carbon sequestration during the establishment phase of M iscanthus × giganteus: a regional‐scale study on commercial farms using 13C natural abundance

Open access
Zimmermann, Jesko, Dauber, Jens, Jones, Michael B.·2012·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

The use of biomass for energy production is considered a promising way to reduce net carbon emissions and mitigate climate change. However, land‐use change to bioenergy crops can result in carbon emissions from soil and vegetation in amounts that could take decades to compensate. Perennial grasses such as M iscanthus offer a possible solution to this problem as measurements on experimental plots planted with M iscanthus have shown significant carbon sequestration in the soil. It can, however, be expected that sequestration potentials in commercial use might differ from those measured in experimental plots due to different farming practices and soil characteristics. For this study, M iscanthus plantations on 16 farms in SE I reland as well as on‐farm controls representing the former land‐use (grassland and tillage) have been examined. The M iscanthus plantations were 2–3 years old. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content and a number of soil properties were measured and the amount of M iscanthus‐derived carbon was determined using the 13C natural abundance method. On both former tillage fields and grasslands, although there were no significant differences in SOC contents between M iscanthus and control sites, it was shown that 2–3 years after M iscanthus establishment, 1.82 ± 1.69 and 2.17 ± 1.73 Mg ha−1 of the SOC under former‐tilled and former grassland respectively were M iscanthus‐derived. Mixed‐effects models were used to link the total SOC concentrations and M iscanthus‐derived carbon to the land‐use parameters as well as to soil properties. It was shown that on control sites, pH had an effect on total SOC. In the case of M iscanthus‐derived carbon, the initial SOC content, pH, former land‐use and crop age had significant effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01117.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grass to perennial grasses changed soil organic carbon by -10.9% ± 4.3 (p < 0.0001, n = 43).

    “| Grass e Perennial Grasses | À0.1158 | 0.0217 | À10.9 | 4.3 | <0.0001 | 43 | [42,49] |”

    From Land use change to bioenergy: A meta-analysis of soil carbon and GHG emissions (2015) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Soil organic carbon stocks section (page not available) reports a significant loss only in the upper 10 cm after grassland was converted to Miscanthus; pooled over soil depth, it found no significant difference. The Discussion likewise reports no significant change in total soil organic carbon over 0–30 cm. Thus the paper does not support the table row’s highly significant overall decrease, and it does not report the stated −10.9% ± 4.3% estimate or n = 43. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Across different environments and time periods, quite similar net storage changes could be found over 3 to 15 years.

    “Across different environments and time periods, quite similar net storage changes could be found (3 to 15 years) [19, 134].”
  • Initial SOC gains are greater on former arable than on former grassland when planted with Miscanthus, although not significant.

    “Although not significant, initial SOC gains are greater on former arable than on former grassland when planted with Miscanthus in spite of greater—probably yield-dependent—sequestration rates on grassland [134].”
  • Initial sequestration rates are low due to small inputs during the establishing phase.

    “The opposite is evident: initial sequestration rates are low due to small inputs during the establishing phase [25, 43, 46, 60, 86, 106, 134], which could depend on the productivity and fertility of the soil, its former land use and planting material/success.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brogan JC (1966) Organic carbon in Irish pasture soils. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research, 5, 169-176.
  2. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Agronomy Monograph 9, 2nd edn (ed. Klute A), pp. 383-411. ASA and SSSA, Mad- ison, WI, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimmermann, J., Dauber, J., & Jones, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
Corresponding author
Zimmermann, Jesko
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-06
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
453-461
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W2022923025
Cited by
80
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of California, Davis
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
Miscanthus × giganteus, soil carbon sequestration, soil organic carbon, 13C natural abundance, energy crops, perennial grasses, land use change, soil pH, commercial plantations, establishment phase, soil properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review