Soil carbon sequestration during the establishment phase of M iscanthus × giganteus: a regional‐scale study on commercial farms using 13C natural abundance
Open accessAbstract
The use of biomass for energy production is considered a promising way to reduce net carbon emissions and mitigate climate change. However, land‐use change to bioenergy crops can result in carbon emissions from soil and vegetation in amounts that could take decades to compensate. Perennial grasses such as M iscanthus offer a possible solution to this problem as measurements on experimental plots planted with M iscanthus have shown significant carbon sequestration in the soil. It can, however, be expected that sequestration potentials in commercial use might differ from those measured in experimental plots due to different farming practices and soil characteristics. For this study, M iscanthus plantations on 16 farms in SE I reland as well as on‐farm controls representing the former land‐use (grassland and tillage) have been examined. The M iscanthus plantations were 2–3 years old. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content and a number of soil properties were measured and the amount of M iscanthus‐derived carbon was determined using the 13C natural abundance method. On both former tillage fields and grasslands, although there were no significant differences in SOC contents between M iscanthus and control sites, it was shown that 2–3 years after M iscanthus establishment, 1.82 ± 1.69 and 2.17 ± 1.73 Mg ha−1 of the SOC under former‐tilled and former grassland respectively were M iscanthus‐derived. Mixed‐effects models were used to link the total SOC concentrations and M iscanthus‐derived carbon to the land‐use parameters as well as to soil properties. It was shown that on control sites, pH had an effect on total SOC. In the case of M iscanthus‐derived carbon, the initial SOC content, pH, former land‐use and crop age had significant effects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Grass to perennial grasses changed soil organic carbon by -10.9% ± 4.3 (p < 0.0001, n = 43).
“| Grass e Perennial Grasses | À0.1158 | 0.0217 | À10.9 | 4.3 | <0.0001 | 43 | [42,49] |”
From Land use change to bioenergy: A meta-analysis of soil carbon and GHG emissions (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
The Soil organic carbon stocks section (page not available) reports a significant loss only in the upper 10 cm after grassland was converted to Miscanthus; pooled over soil depth, it found no significant difference. The Discussion likewise reports no significant change in total soil organic carbon over 0–30 cm. Thus the paper does not support the table row’s highly significant overall decrease, and it does not report the stated −10.9% ± 4.3% estimate or n = 43. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAcross different environments and time periods, quite similar net storage changes could be found over 3 to 15 years.
“Across different environments and time periods, quite similar net storage changes could be found (3 to 15 years) [19, 134].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [134]
Initial SOC gains are greater on former arable than on former grassland when planted with Miscanthus, although not significant.
“Although not significant, initial SOC gains are greater on former arable than on former grassland when planted with Miscanthus in spite of greater—probably yield-dependent—sequestration rates on grassland [134].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [134]
Initial sequestration rates are low due to small inputs during the establishing phase.
“The opposite is evident: initial sequestration rates are low due to small inputs during the establishing phase [25, 43, 46, 60, 86, 106, 134], which could depend on the productivity and fertility of the soil, its former land use and planting material/success.”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [134]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,811 · see citing works
nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models
Pinheiro, J., R Core Team, & Bates, D. (1999) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.nlme · Cited by 6,867 · see citing works
Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., & Yu, T.-H. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151861 · Cited by 4,888 · see citing works
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Hawthorne, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152747 · Cited by 3,902 · see citing works
Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Tiffany, D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604600103 · Cited by 2,871 · see citing works
Two Categories of 13 C/ 12 C Ratios for Higher Plants
Smith, B. N., & Epstein, S. (1971) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.47.3.380 · Cited by 2,051 · see citing works
Beneficial biofuels—the food, energy, and environment trilemma
Tilman, D., Socolow, R., Foley, J. A., Hill, J., Larson, E., Lynd, L., Pacala, S., Reilly, J., Searchinger, T., Somerville, C., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177970 · Cited by 1,596 · see citing works
GRASSLAND MANAGEMENT AND CONVERSION INTO GRASSLAND: EFFECTS ON SOIL CARBON
Conant, R. T., Paustian, K., & Elliott, E. T. (2001) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0343:gmacig]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,365 · see citing works
Harris, D., Horwath, W., & van Kessel, C. (2001) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2001.1853 · Cited by 1,283 · see citing works
Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe
Freibauer, A., Rounsevell, M., Smith, P., & Verhagen, A. (2004) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.021 · Cited by 920 · see citing works
POEPLAU, C., DON, A., VESTERDAL, L., LEIFELD, J., VAN WESEMAEL, B., SCHUMACHER, J., & GENSIOR, A. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02408.x · Cited by 918 · see citing works
pH regulation of carbon and nitrogen dynamics in two agricultural soils
Kemmitt, S. J., WRIGHT, D., Goulding, K. W. T., & JONES, D. (2005) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.006 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Carbon sequestration in croplands: the potential in Europe and the global context
Smith, P. (2004) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2003.08.002 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Carbon cycling and sequestration opportunities in temperate grasslands
Soussana, J.-F., Soussana, J.-F., Loiseau, P., Vuichard, N., Ceschia, E., Balesdent, J., Chevallier, T., & Arrouays, D. (2004) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1079/sum2003234 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Land use change and soil organic carbon dynamics
Smith, P. (2007) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-007-9138-y · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Ethanol as Fuel: Energy, Carbon Dioxide Balances, and Ecological Footprint
de Oliveira, M. E. D., Vaughan, B. E., & Rykiel, E. J. (2005) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0593:eafecd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Chan, K. Y. (2001) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(00)00173-2 · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Energy crops: current status and future prospects
Sims, R., Hastings, A., Schlamadinger, B., Taylor, G., & Smith, P. (2006) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01163.x · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Jones, M. B., & Donnelly, A. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01201.x · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Self-citationAgriculture, Fisheries and Food
Keen, B. A. (1962) · Nature · doi:10.1038/196918a0 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Plants to power: bioenergy to fuel the future
Yuan, J. S., Tiller, K. H., Al‐Ahmad, H., Stewart, N. R., & Stewart, C. N. (2008) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.06.001 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Gibbs, H. K., Johnston, M., Foley, J. A., Holloway, T., Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N., & Zaks, D. (2008) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034001 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Rowe, R. L., Street, N. R., & Taylor, G. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.008 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, <i>Miscanthus</i>
CLIFTON‐BROWN, J. C., BREUER, J., & JONES, M. B. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01438.x · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, C., & McGrath, D. (2003) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.08.004 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Motavalli, P. P., Palm, C. A., Parton, W. J., Elliott, E. T., & Frey, S. D. (1995) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(95)00082-p · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Kahle, P., Beuch, S., Boelcke, B., Leinweber, P., & Schulten, H.-R. (2001) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(01)00102-2 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
van Eekeren, N. J. M., Bommelé, L., Bloem, J., et al. (2008) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.06.010 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon concentrations in grassland of Ireland
McGrath, D., & Zhang, C. (2003) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0883-2927(03)00045-3 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Chan, K. Y., Conyers, M. K., Li, G. D., Helyar, K. R., Poile, G. J., Oates, A. A., & Barchia, I. M. (2011) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr10185 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Somerville, C. R. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.010 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Soil C and N changes on conservation reserve program lands in the Central Great Plains
Reeder, J. D., Schuman, G. E., & Bowman, R. A. (1998) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00122-6 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Maize root-derived soil organic carbon estimated by natural 15c abundance
Balesdent, J., & Balabane, M. (1992) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(92)90264-x · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Tillage-induced increases in carbon dioxide loss from soil
Roberts, W. P., & Chan, K. Y. (1990) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/0167-1987(90)90012-3 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Grogan, P., & Matthews, R. (2002) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2002.tb00237.x · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Foereid, B., de Neergaard, A., & Høgh-Jensen, H. (2004) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.03.002 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Decomposition and mineralization of energy crop residues governed by earthworms
Ernst, G., Henseler, I., Felten, D., & Emmerling, C. (2009) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.04.015 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
DONDINI, M., VAN GROENIGEN, K., DEL GALDO, I., & JONES, M. B. (2009) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01025.x · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationSMITH, R., & Slater, F. M. (2010) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01051.x · Cited by 45 · see citing works
(2001) · Aspects of applied biology · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Donnelly, A., Styles, D., Fitzgerald, J., & Finnan, J. (2010) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01086.x · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Carbon input by plants into the soil. Review
Kuzyakov, Y., & Domanski, G. (2000) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/1522-2624(200008)163:4
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Brogan JC (1966) Organic carbon in Irish pasture soils. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research, 5, 169-176.
- Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Agronomy Monograph 9, 2nd edn (ed. Klute A), pp. 383-411. ASA and SSSA, Mad- ison, WI, USA.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental costs and benefits of growing<i>Miscanthus</i>for bioenergy in the<scp>UK</scp>
McCalmont, J. P., Hastings, A., McNamara, N. P., Richter, G. M., Robson, P., Donnison, I. S., & Clifton‐Brown, J. (2017) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12294 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Soil carbon sequestration and land use change associated with biofuel production: empirical evidence
Qin, Z., Dunn, J. B., Kwon, H., Mueller, S., & Wander, M. M. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12237 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Bioenergy from “surplus” land: environmental and socio-economic implications
Dauber, J., Brown, C., Fernando, A. L., Finnan, J., Krasuska, E., Ponitka, J., Styles, D., Thrän, D., Van Groenigen, K. J., Weih, M., et al. (2012) · BioRisk · doi:10.3897/biorisk.7.3036 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Self-citationLand use change to bioenergy: A meta-analysis of soil carbon and GHG emissions
Harris, Z. M., Spake, R., & Taylor, G. (2015) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.05.008 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out?
Agostini, F., Gregory, A. S., & Richter, G. M. (2015) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-014-9571-0 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Zatta, A., Clifton‐Brown, J., Robson, P., Hastings, A., & Monti, A. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12054 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Poeplau, C., & Don, A. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12043 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Cattaneo, F., Barbanti, L., Gioacchini, P., Ciavatta, C., & Marzadori, C. (2014) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-014-0931-x · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Zimmermann, J., Styles, D., Hastings, A., Dauber, J., & Jones, M. B. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12084 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationHolder, A. J., Clifton‐Brown, J., Rowe, R., Robson, P., Elias, D., Dondini, M., McNamara, N. P., Donnison, I. S., & McCalmont, J. P. (2019) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12624 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“to Miscanthus field‐based studies (Clifton‐Brown et al., 2007; Schneckenberger & Kuzyakov, 2007; Zang et al., 2018; Zimmermann et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialZimmermann, J., Dondini, M., & Jones, M. B. (2013) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/ejss.12087 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationLong-Term Yields and Soil Carbon Sequestration from Miscanthus: A Review
Jones, M. B., Zimmermann, J., & Clifton-Brown, J. (2016) · Perennial Biomass Crops for a Resource-Constrained World · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44530-4_4 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationVoigt, T. B. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12150 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zimmermann, J., Dauber, J., & Jones, M. B.
- Affiliations
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zimmermann, Jesko
- Venue
- GCB Bioenergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-09-06
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 453-461
- ISSN
- 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-1707
- OpenAlex
- W2022923025
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 14.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of California, Davis
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- Miscanthus × giganteus, soil carbon sequestration, soil organic carbon, 13C natural abundance, energy crops, perennial grasses, land use change, soil pH, commercial plantations, establishment phase, soil properties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review