Cited by 27Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

The impact of sperm morphology on the outcome of intrauterine insemination cycles with gonadotropins in unexplained and male subfertility

Erdem, Mehmet, Erdem, Ahmet, Mutlu, Mehmet Firat, Ozisik, Seckin, Yildiz, Sule, Guler, Ismail, Karakaya, Cengiz·2016·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

Objective To determine the impact of sperm morphology on success of intrauterine insemination (IUI) in unexplained and male subfertility. Study design Basal and post-wash normal percentage of sperm with normal morphology was assessed prospectively in 412 couples with 530 IUI cycles who underwent ovarian hyperstimulation with gonadotropins. The primary outcome was live birth per cycle. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to determine the effectiveness of sperm morphology to predict live birth in IUI cycles. Results Normal sperm morphology (%) after preparation was higher in patients with live birth (5.4 ± 4.5 vs 4.3 ± 4.1; respectively, p Conclusion Morphological evaluation is not a reliable parameter alone for predicting pregnancy outcome in unexplained infertility. In male subfertility, post-wash normal sperm morphology percentage higher than 4.5 increases the probability of live birth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.12.014

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erdem, M., Erdem, A., Mutlu, M. F., Ozisik, S., Yildiz, S., Guler, I., & Karakaya, C.
Affiliations
Gazi University (TR)
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
197
Pages
120-124
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W2200473979
Cited by
27
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
sperm morphology, intrauterine insemination, male subfertility, unexplained infertility, live birth prediction, gonadotropin stimulation, sperm washing, ovarian hyperstimulation, pregnancy outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fertility Agents, Female, Humans, Infertility, Infertility, Male, Insemination, Artificial, Male, Menotropins, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Recombinant Proteins, ROC Curve, Spermatozoa, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Pregnancy Rate, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human, Live Birth, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review