The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of thermochemical routes for hydrogen production from biomass: A review
Abstract
Abstract H 2 is regarded as one of the cleanest future energy carrier that can be generated from renewable sources and will give rise to a reduction of CO 2 emissions and environmental problems related to the use of petroleum based feedstock. Thus, the thermochemical routes from biomass for sustainable H 2 production compared to other biomass treatment routes have a great potential for its industrial implementation. Gasification of biomass and reforming of the bio-oil produced by biomass pyrolysis are the most researched pathways, although some studies dealing with supercritical water gasification and bio-oil gasification can also be found in the literature. Nevertheless, pyrolysis and in-line catalytic steam reforming strategy is gaining great attention due to its advantages compared to gasification and bio-oil reforming, especially those related to the optimization of each step (pyrolysis and catalytic steps) and bio-oil feeding. This review deals with the different reactor configurations, operating conditions and catalysts used in each process and compares the different alternatives in terms of H 2 production, with emphasis placing on the advantages of the two-step strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review
Mohan, D., Pittman, C. U., & Steele, P. H. (2006) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef0502397 · Cited by 5,663
Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading
Bridgwater, A. V. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.048 · Cited by 4,856
Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis
DIBLASI, C. (2008) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2006.12.001 · Cited by 1,752
Biofuels Production through Biomass Pyrolysis—A Technological Review
Jahirul, M., Rasul, M., Chowdhury, A., & Ashwath, N. (2012) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en5124952 · Cited by 1,427
The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment
Popp, J., Lakner, Z., Harangi-Rákos, M., & Fári, M. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.056 · Cited by 967
Lopez, G., Artetxe, M., Amutio, M., Bilbao, J., & Olazar, M. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.142 · Cited by 897
Self-citationRecent advances in the gasification of waste plastics. A critical overview
Lopez, G., Artetxe, M., Amutio, M., Alvarez, J., Bilbao, J., & Olazar, M. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.032 · Cited by 852
Self-citationTechno-economic analysis of biomass fast pyrolysis to transportation fuels
Wright, M. M., Daugaard, D. E., Satrio, J. A., & Brown, R. C. (2010) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2010.07.029 · Cited by 814
Biomass Gasification in Supercritical Water
Antal, M. J., Allen, S. G., Schulman, D., Xu, X., & Divilio, R. J. (2000) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie0003436 · Cited by 610
Bio-oil production from rice husk fast pyrolysis in a conical spouted bed reactor
Alvarez, J., Lopez, G., Amutio, M., Bilbao, J., & Olazar, M. (2014) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.02.074 · Cited by 329
Self-citation
Cited by
(2021) · doi:10.3390/en14185917 · Cited by 708
Faye, O., Szpunar, J., & Eduok, U. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.02.112 · Cited by 689
Lepage, T., Kammoun, M., Schmetz, Q., & Richel, A. (2021) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105920 · Cited by 566
Perspective on the hydrogen economy as a pathway to reach net-zero CO2emissions in Europe
van der Spek, M., Banet, C., Bauer, C., Gabrielli, P., Goldthorpe, W., Mazzotti, M., Munkejord, S. T., Røkke, N. A., Shah, N., Sunny, N., et al. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee02118d · Cited by 423
Agyekum, E. B., Nutakor, C., Agwa, A. M., & Kamel, S. (2022) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes12020173 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Arregi, A., Amutio, M., Lopez, G., Bilbao, J., & Olazar, M.
- Venue
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 165
- Pages
- 696-719
- ISSN
- 0196-8904 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2795777039
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 19.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of thermochemical routes for hydrogen production from biomass: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.089
- The paper
- Arregi, A., Amutio, M., Lopez, G., Bilbao, J., & Olazar, M. (2018). Evaluation of thermochemical routes for hydrogen production from biomass: A review. Energy Conversion and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
