Cited by 505Air Quality and Health ImpactsIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureClimate Change and Health Impacts

Systematic review of Chinese studies of short-term exposure to air pollution and daily mortality

Shang, Yu, Sun, Zhiwei, Cao, Junji, Wang, Xinming, Zhong, Liuju, Bi, Xinhui, Li, Hong, Liu, Wenxin +2 more·2013·Environment International

Abstract

Health effects attributable to air pollution exposure in Chinese population have been least understood. The authors conducted a meta-analysis on 33 time-series and case-crossover studies conducted in China to assess mortality effects of short-term exposure to particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters less than 10 and 2.5 μm (PM10 and PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3) and carbon monoxide (CO). Significant associations between air pollution exposure and increased mortality risks were observed in the pooled estimates for all pollutants of interest. In specific, each 10 μg/m(3) increase in PM2.5 was associated with a 0.38% (95% Confidence Interval, CI: 0.31, 0.45) increase in total mortality, a 0.51% (95% CI: 0.30, 0.73) in respiratory mortality, and a 0.44% (95% CI: 0.33, 0.54) in cardiovascular mortality. When current annual PM2.5 levels in mega-Chinese cities to be reduced to the WHO Air Quality Guideline (AQG) of 10 μg/m(3), mortality attributable to short-term exposure to PM2.5 could be reduced by 2.7%, 1.7%, 2.3%, and 6.2% in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Xi'an, respectively. The authors recommend future studies on the nature of air pollution concentration and health effect relationships in Chinese population to support setting stringent air quality standards to improve public health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envint.2013.01.010

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shang, Y., Sun, Z., Cao, J., Wang, X., Zhong, L., Bi, X., Li, H., Liu, W., Zhu, T., & Huang, W.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Guangdong Province Environmental Monitoring Center (CN)
  • Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Wei
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
54
Pages
100-111
ISSN
0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2519272334
Cited by
505
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environment International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
Keywords
short-term air pollution exposure, daily mortality, PM2.5, PM10, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, carbon monoxide, respiratory mortality, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, air quality guidelines, air quality standards, Chinese cities, air pollution health effects
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, China, Environmental Exposure, Humans, Mortality, Nitrogen Dioxide, Ozone, Sulfur Dioxide, Cross-Over Studies, Particulate Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review