Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 780

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimation of airborne viral emission: Quanta emission rate of SARS-CoV-2 for infection risk assessment

Open access
Buonanno, G., Stabile, L., Morawska, L.·2020·Environment International

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Airborne transmission is a pathway of contagion that is still not sufficiently investigated despite the evidence in the scientific literature of the role it can play in the context of an epidemic. While the medical research area dedicates efforts to find cures and remedies to counteract the effects of a virus, the engineering area is involved in providing risk assessments in indoor environments by simulating the airborne transmission of the virus during an epidemic. To this end, virus air emission data are needed. Unfortunately, this information is usually available only after the outbreak, based on specific reverse engineering cases. In this work, a novel approach to estimate the viral load emitted by a contagious subject on the basis of the viral load in the mouth, the type of respiratory activity (e.g. breathing, speaking), respiratory physiological parameters (e.g. inhalation rate), and activity level (e.g. resting, standing, light exercise) is proposed. The estimates of the proposed approach are in good agreement with values of viral loads of well-known diseases from the literature. The quanta emission rates of an asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected subject, with a viral load in the mouth of 10 8 copies mL −1 , were 10.5 quanta h −1 and 320 quanta h −1 for breathing and speaking respiratory activities, respectively, at rest. In the case of light activity, the values would increase to 33.9 quanta h −1 and 1.03×10 3 quanta h −1 , respectively. The findings in terms of quanta emission rates were then adopted in infection risk models to demonstrate its application by evaluating the number of people infected by an asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 subject in Italian indoor microenvironments before and after the introduction of virus containment measures. The results obtained from the simulations clearly highlight that a key role is played by proper ventilation in containment of the virus in indoor environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105794

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Chao, 2009, Characterization of expiration air jets and droplet size distributions immediately at the mouth opening, J. Aerosol Sci., 40, 122, 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Chatoutsidou, 2019, Assessment of the impact of particulate dry deposition on soiling of indoor cultural heritage objects found in churches and museums/libraries, J. Cult. Heritage, 39, 221, 10.1016/j.culher.2019.02.017 · DOI
  3. d’Ambrosio Alfano, 2012, Experimental analysis of air tightness in Mediterranean buildings using the fan pressurization method, Build. Environ., 53, 16, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.12.017 · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.12.017
  4. Duguid, 1945, The numbers and the sites of origin of the droplets expelled during expiratory activities, Edinburgh Med. J. LII, II, 385
  5. Gammaitoni, 1997, Using a mathematical model to evaluate the efficacy of TB control measures, Emerg. Infect. Dis., 335, 10.3201/eid0303.970310 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Jennison, 1942, Atomizing of mouth and nose secretions into the air as revealed by high speed photography, Aerobiology, 17, 106
  7. Johnson, 2011, Modality of human expired aerosol size distributions, J. Aerosol Sci., 42, 839, 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.07.009 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Knibbs, 2011, Room ventilation and the risk of airborne infection transmission in 3 health care settings within a large teaching hospital, Am. J. Infect. Control, 39, 866, 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.02.014 · DOI
  9. Li, 2005, Multi-zone modeling of probable SARS virus transmission by airflow between flats in Block E, Amoy Gardens, Indoor Air, 15, 96, 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00318.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Morawska, 2006, Droplet fate in indoor environments, or can we prevent the spread of infection?, Indoor Air, 16, 335, 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00432.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Morawska, 2009, Size distribution and sites of origin of droplets expelled from the human respiratory tract during expiratory activities, J. Aerosol Sci., 40, 256, 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Riley, 1978, Airborne spread of measles in a suburban elementary school, Am. J. Epidemiol., 431
  13. Rothe, 2020, Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Contact in Germany, N. Engl. J. Med., 382, 970, 10.1056/NEJMc2001468 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Stabile, 2019, The effect of the ventilation retrofit in a school on CO2, airborne particles, and energy consumptions, Build. Environ., 156, 1, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.001 · DOI
  15. Stabile, 2017, The effect of natural ventilation strategy on indoor air quality in schools, Sci. Total Environ., 595, 894, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.048 · DOI
  16. Sze To, 2010, Review and comparison between the Wells-Riley and dose-response approaches to risk assessment of infectious respiratory diseases, Indoor Air, 20, 2, 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2009.00621.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Tang, 2011, Observing and quantifying airflows in the infection control of aerosol- and airborne-transmitted diseases: an overview of approaches, J. Hosp. Infect., 77, 213, 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.09.037 · DOI
  18. To, 2020, Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study, Lancet. Infect. Dis, 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30196-1 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Wagner, 2009, Calculating the potential for within-flight transmission of influenza A (H1N1), BMC Med., 7, 81, 10.1186/1741-7015-7-81 · DOI
  20. Watanabe, 2010, Development of a dose-response model for SARS coronavirus, Risk Anal., 30, 1129, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01427.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Wells, 1934, On airborne infection: study II. Droplets and Droplet nuclei, Am. J. Epidemiol., 20, 611, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a118097 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Yang, 2011, Dynamics of Airborne Influenza A Viruses Indoors and Dependence on Humidity, PLoS ONE, 6
  23. Yu, 2004, Evidence of Airborne Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus, N. Engl. J. Med., 350, 1731, 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 780

Metadata

Authors
Buonanno, G., Stabile, L., & Morawska, L.
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
141
Pages
105794
ISSN
0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021690023
Cited by
780
References
4
FWCI
70.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of airborne viral emission: Quanta emission rate of SARS-CoV-2 for infection risk assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105794
The paper
Buonanno, G., Stabile, L., & Morawska, L. (2020). Estimation of airborne viral emission: Quanta emission rate of SARS-CoV-2 for infection risk assessment. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105794

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.