Cited by 167Microplastics and Plastic PollutionImmunotoxicology and immune responsesNanoparticles: synthesis and applications

Polystyrene micro-/nanoplastics induced hematopoietic damages via the crosstalk of gut microbiota, metabolites, and cytokines

Open access
Jing, Jiaru, Zhang, Lei, Han, Lin, Wang, Jingyu, Zhang, Wei, Liu, Ziyan, Gao, Ai·2022·Environment International

Abstract

Micro-/nanoplastics (MNPLs), novel environmental pollutants, widely exist in the environment and life and bring health risks. Previous studies have shown that NMPLs can penetrate bone marrow, but whether they cause hematopoietic damage remains uncertain. In this study, C57BL/6J mice were treated with polystyrene MNPLs (PS-MNPLs, 10 μm, 5 μm and 80 nm) at 60 μg doses for 42 days by intragastric administration. We evaluated the hematopoietic toxicity induced by MNPLs and potential mechanisms via combining 16S rRNA, metabolomics, and cytokine chips. The results demonstrated that PS-MNPLs induced hematopoietic toxicity, which was manifested by the disorder of bone marrow cell arrangement, the reduction in colony-forming, self-renewal and differentiation capacity, and the increased proportion of lymphocytes. PS-MNPLs also disrupted the homeostasis of the gut microbiota, metabolism, and inflammation, all of which were correlated with hematotoxicity, suggesting that abnormal gut microbiota-metabolite-cytokine axes might be the crucial pathways in MNPLs-induced hematopoietic injury. In conclusion, our study systematically demonstrated that multi-scale PS-MNPLs induced hematopoietic toxicity via the crosstalk of gut microbiota, metabolites, and cytokines and provided valuable insights into MNPLs toxicity, which was conducive to health risk assessment and informed policy decisions regarding PS-MNPLs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107131

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies investigated mammalian models exposed to micro-/nanoplastics for 42 days, identifying erythrocyte reductions linked to changes in HSCs mediated by interactions with gut microbiota and cytokines.

    “For example, (Jing et al., 2022) investigated mammalian models exposed to micro-/nanoplastics for 42 days, identifying erythrocyte reductions linked to changes in HSCs mediated by interactions with gut microbiota and cytokines.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jing, J., Zhang, L., Han, L., Wang, J., Zhang, W., Liu, Z., & Gao, A.
Affiliations
Capital Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Gao, Ai
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
161
Pages
107131
ISSN
0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211167922
Cited by
167
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 12
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environment International (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
Keywords
hematologic toxicity, hematopoietic damage, gut microbiota, bone marrow, inflammation, metabolomics, cytokines, lymphocyte expansion, self-renewal and differentiation, environmental pollutants
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Microplastics, Animals, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Polystyrenes, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Cytokines, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review