Cited by 59Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesCellular transport and secretionGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Use of fluorescence imaging to investigate the structure and function of intestinal M cells

BUDA, A·2005·Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Abstract

Fluorescence imaging technology can be applied to many aspects of cell biology ranging from the analysis of specific markers in cells and tissues to the biological actions and distribution of fluorescent proteins or particles in living cells. In this review, we examine the role of fluorescence imaging, in conjunction with other microscopical techniques, to study sites of uptake of material across the gastrointestinal epithelium. We will focus primarily on intestinal M cells, specialised antigen-sampling cells in the epithelium of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), including Peyer's patches. In addition to their importance as sites for uptake of inert material, and hence their potential as a route of delivery of vaccines, etc., M cells are also a major site of infection by a range of microbial pathogens. The application of new fluorescence imaging technologies has expanded our knowledge on the structure, development and function of these fascinating cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addr.2004.07.014

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proportion of M cells in follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer's patches can be high in rabbits and mini-pigs, but is much lower in rodents (10%) and humans (<5%).

    “Although the proportion of M cells in follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer’s patches can be high in rabbits and mini-pigs, the occurrence in rodents (10%) and humans (<5%) is much lower [29].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BUDA, A.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
BUDA, A
ORCID
BUDA, A
Venue
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
123-134
ISSN
0169-409X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992521891
Cited by
59
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
fluorescence imaging, gut-associated lymphoid tissue, Peyer's patches, antigen sampling, gastrointestinal epithelium, oral vaccine delivery, microbial infection
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Molecular Biology, Peyer's Patches, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Microscopy, Confocal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review