Cited by 0Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluorine in Organic ChemistryChemical Analysis and Environmental Impact

Mobile short- and ultrashort-chain PFAS in Korean aquatic systems: Matrix-specific profiles, industrial signatures, and sum-based monitoring implications

Choi, Soobin, Park, Jeonghoon, Zoh, Kyung-Duk·2026·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

This study investigated the occurrence and compositional characteristics of short- and ultrashort-chain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) across tap water, surface water, and wastewater in South Korea. Targeted quantification of 11 PFAS was combined with high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS)-based suspect screening to evaluate matrix-specific profiles and monitoring implications. A total of 36 water samples were analyzed, and total concentrations of target PFAS ranged from 169.3 to 5046.8 ng/L. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was ubiquitous and dominant across all matrices, whereas elevated concentrations of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TFMS; up to 4858.8 ng/L) and perfluoropropionic acid (PFPrA; up to 744.6 ng/L) were observed in surface waters adjacent to industrial complexes, consistent with possible localized industrial influence. Principal component analysis (PCA) suggested partially distinct compositional tendencies among industrially influenced surface waters, wastewater, and tap water samples. In addition, HRMS-based suspect screening tentatively annotated six PFAS beyond the predefined target list, providing qualitative insight into potentially broader PFAS diversity. Screening-level comparisons with sum-based benchmark frameworks indicated that cumulative PFAS burdens may be environmentally relevant even when individual compounds remain below available reference values. This study provides a multi-matrix assessment of short- and ultrashort-chain PFAS in aquatic systems of South Korea, and matrix-specific occurrence profiles, compositional tendencies associated with industrially influenced waters, and the contribution of ultrashort-chain PFAS to cumulative PFAS burdens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128916

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Choi, S., Park, J., & Zoh, K.-D.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Zoh, Kyung-Duk
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-12
Volume
411
Issue
Pt A
Pages
128916
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7196933676
Cited by
0
References
47
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2026-25474865)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
Keywords
short-chain PFAS, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, trifluoroacetic acid, trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, tap water, surface water, wastewater, industrial pollution, suspect screening, South Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review