Cited by 688Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluoride Effects and RemovalWater Treatment and Disinfection

Human exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) through drinking water: a review of the recent scientific literature

Domingo, José L., Nadal, Martí·2019·Environmental Research

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of water-soluble chemical compounds with an important number of applications, which have been widely used during the last 60 years. Two of them, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), are the most known and well investigated. As for many other organic substances that are of environmental concern, the diet is the main route of human exposure to PFAS. However, in certain cases drinking water may also mean a significant contribution to human exposure, and to a lesser extent, dust and air (indoor exposure). In recent years, the environmental persistence of PFAS, their biomagnification in food webs, as well as their potential accumulation and toxicity, have generated a notable interest, which has been evidenced by the considerable number of publications in this regard. Recently, we carried out a wide revision on the levels of PFAS in food and human dietary intake. In the current review, we have summarized the recent information (last 10 years) published in the scientific literature (Scopus and PubMed) on the concentrations of PFAS in drinking water and the human health risks derived from the regular water consumption, when available. A large amount of data belongs to PFOS and PFOA and corresponds to studies mainly conducted in countries of the European Union, USA and China, although no information is available for most countries over the world. According to the toxicological information about PFAS…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108648

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Domingo, J. L., & Nadal, M.
Affiliations
Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (ES)
Corresponding author
Domingo, José L.
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
177
Pages
108648
ISSN
0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2968829238
Cited by
688
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 123 · 2025: 156 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 31
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, drinking water contamination, human exposure, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, dietary intake, health risk assessment, municipal tap water, PFAS toxicity, biomagnification, environmental persistence
MeSH terms
Dietary Exposure, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review