Cited by 32Bioenergy crop production and managementForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems

Assessing the impact of within crop heterogeneity (‘patchiness’) in young Miscanthus × giganteus fields on economic feasibility and soil carbon sequestration

Zimmermann, Jesko, Styles, David, Hastings, Astley, Dauber, Jens, Jones, Michael B·2014·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

In Ireland, Miscanthus × giganteus has the potential to become a major feedstock for bioenergy production. However, under current climatic conditions, Ireland is situated on the margin of the geographical range where Miscanthus production is economically feasible. It is therefore important to optimize the yield and other ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration delivered by the crop. A survey of commercial Miscanthus fields showed a large number of areas with no Miscanthus crop cover. These patches can potentially lead to reduced crop yields and soil carbon sequestration and have a significant negative impact on the economic viability of the crop. The aim of this research is to assess patchiness on a field scale and to analyse the impacts on crop yield and soil carbon sequestration. Analysis of aerial photography images was carried out on six commercial Miscanthus plantations in south east Ireland. The analysis showed an average of 372.5 patches per hectare, covering an average of 13.7% of the field area. Using net present value models and a financial balance approach it was shown that patchiness has a significant impact on payback time for initial investments and might reduce gross margins by more than 50%. Total and Miscanthus‐derived soil organic carbon was measured in open patches and adjacent plots of high crop density showing significantly lower Miscanthus‐derived carbon stocks in open patches compared to high crop‐density patches (0.47Mg C ha−1 ± 0.42 SD and 0.91Mg C ha−1 ± 0.55 SD). Using geographic information system (GIS) it was shown that on a field scale Miscanthus‐derived carbon stocks were reduced by 7.38% ± 7.25 SD. However, total soil organic carbon stocks were not significantly different between open patches and high crop density plots indicating no impact on the overall carbon sequestration on a field scale over 3–4 years since establishment for these Miscanthus sites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcbb.12084

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Little information was available on parameters affecting soil organic carbon accumulation in slowly decomposable or recalcitrant forms.

    “Although some papers recorded specific fractions of SOC [11, 45, 46], little information was available on parameters affecting SOC accumulation in slowly decomposable or ‘recalcitrant’ forms [25, 35, 47].”
  • Initial sequestration rates are low due to small inputs during the establishing phase.

    “The opposite is evident: initial sequestration rates are low due to small inputs during the establishing phase [25, 43, 46, 60, 86, 106, 134], which could depend on the productivity and fertility of the soil, its former land use and planting material/success.”
  • Assumptions that the soil-crop system was at potential productivity and equilibrium could be wrong where net SOC formation is delayed, cover is patchy, or residues vary in decomposability.

    “Their assumptions that the soil-crop system was at potential productivity, and equilibrium could be wrong where net SOC formation is delayed [86], cover is patchy [46, 139] or residues vary in their decomposability [108].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimmermann, J., Styles, D., Hastings, A., Dauber, J., & Jones, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
Corresponding author
Zimmermann, Jesko
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05-17
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
566-576
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W2152427191
Cited by
32
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of California, Davis
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Keywords
Miscanthus × giganteus, soil carbon sequestration, soil organic carbon stocks, economic feasibility, biomass feedstock, crop yield, aerial photography, net present value, gross margin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review