CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conceptual and empirical advances in analysing policy mixes for energy transitions

Rogge, Karoline S., Kern, Florian, Howlett, Michael·2017·Energy Research & Social Science
DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.025
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.025

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Exemplary visualizations of a range of policy mix conceptualizations from the three fi elds. Source: Own compilation of [29,30,32,37,47,89].
Fig. 1 Exemplary visualizations of a range of policy mix conceptualizations from the three fi elds. Source: Own compilation of [29,30,32,37,47,89].CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Fouquet, 2010, The slow search for solutions: lessons from historical energy transitions by sector and service, Energy Policy, 38, 6586, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.029 · DOI
  2. Meadowcroft, 2009, What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions, Policy Sci., 42, 323, 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z · DOI
  3. Araújo, 2014, The emerging field of energy transitions: progress, challenges, and opportunities, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 1, 112, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.002 · DOI
  4. Kern, 2016, The pace of governed energy transitions: agency, international dynamics and the global Paris agreement accelerating decarbonisation processes?, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 22, 13, 10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.016 · DOI
  5. Kuzemko, 2016, Governing for sustainable energy system change: politics, contexts and contingency, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 12, 96, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.022 · DOI
  6. Sovacool, 2016, How long will it take?: conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 13, 202, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020 · DOI
  7. Sovacool, 2016, Further reflections on the temporality of energy transitions: a response to critics, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 22, 232, 10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.013 · DOI
  8. Unruh, 2000, Understanding carbon lock-in, Energy Policy, 28, 817, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Walker, 2000, Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations, Res. Policy, 29, 833, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00108-6 · DOI
  10. Meadowcroft, 2011, Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions, Environ. Innovation Societal Transitions, 1, 70, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003 · DOI
  11. Geels, 2014, Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective, Theory Cult. Soc., 31, 21, 10.1177/0263276414531627 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Weber, 2012, Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework, Res. Policy, 41, 1037, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015 · DOI · Paper page
  13. van den Bergh, 2016, Disagreement on sustainability policy within the social sciences?, Eur. Rev., 24, 83, 10.1017/S1062798715000460 · DOI
  14. Green, 2008, Carbon tax or carbon permits: the impact on generators' risks, Energy J., 29, 67, 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-No3-4 · DOI
  15. Bristow, 2010, Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1824, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.021 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Gallagher, 2012, The energy technology innovation system, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 37, 137, 10.1146/annurev-environ-060311-133915 · DOI
  17. Wieczorek, 2012, Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars, Sci. Public Policy, 39, 74, 10.1093/scipol/scr008 · DOI
  18. Lehmann, 2012, Justifying a policy mix for pollution control: a review of economic literature, J. Econ. Surv., 26, 71, 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00628.x · DOI
  19. Jacobsson, 2006, The politics and policy of energy system transformation – explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology, Energy Policy, 34, 256, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.029 · DOI
  20. Gawel, 2013, Germany's energy transition under attack: is there an inscrutable German Sonderweg?, Nat. Cult., 8, 121, 10.3167/nc.2013.080201 · DOI
  21. K.S. Rogge, P. Johnstone, this issue. Exploring the role of phase-out policies for low-carbon energy transitions: the case of the German Energiewende. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. · DOI
  22. Reichardt, 2016, How the policy mix impacts innovation: findings from company case studies on offshore wind in Germany, Environ. Innovation Societal Transitions, 18, 62, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.08.001 · DOI
  23. Rogge, 2016, Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis, Res. Policy, 45, 1620, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kern, 2009, Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector, Policy Sci., 42, 391, 10.1007/s11077-009-9099-x · DOI
  25. Kivimaa, 2016, Creative destruction or mere niche support?: innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions, Res. Policy, 45, 205, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008 · DOI
  26. Braathen, 2007, Instrument mixes for environmental policy: how many stones should be used to kill a bird?, Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ., 1, 185, 10.1561/101.00000005 · DOI
  27. Sorrell, 2003, Carbon trading in the policy mix, Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy, 19, 420, 10.1093/oxrep/19.3.420 · DOI
  28. del Río González, 2006, The interaction between emissions trading and renewable electricity support schemes: an overview of the literature, Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, 12, 1363
  29. Spyridaki, 2014, A paper trail of evaluation approaches to energy and climate policy interactions, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 40, 1090, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.001 · DOI
  30. Flanagan, 2011, Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation, Res. Policy, 40, 702, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005 · DOI
  31. Howlett, 2017, Policy integration and multi-level governance: dealing with the vertical dimension of policy mix designs, PaG, 5, 69, 10.17645/pag.v5i2.928 · DOI
  32. Costantini, 2017, Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: a patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies, Res. Policy, 46, 799, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.004 · DOI
  33. Kern, 2017, Policy packaging or policy patching?: the development of complex energy efficiency policy mixes, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 23, 11, 10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.002 · DOI
  34. Jaffe, 2005, A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy, Ecol. Econ., 54, 164, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.027 · DOI
  35. Fischer, 2010, Combining policies for renewable energy: is the whole less than the sum of its parts?, Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ., 4, 51, 10.1561/101.00000030 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Antonioli, 2014, Analysing the interactions of energy and climate policies in a broad policy ‘optimality’ framework: the Italian case study, J. Integr. Environ. Sci., 11, 205, 10.1080/1943815X.2014.962549 · DOI
  37. Howlett, 2007, Design principles for policy mixes: cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’, Policy Soc., 26, 1, 10.1016/S1449-4035(07)70118-2 · DOI
  38. Howlett, 2013, Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: assessing policy portfolio design, Polit. Gov., 1, 170, 10.17645/pag.v1i2.95 · DOI
  39. Magro, 2013, Complex innovation policy systems: towards an evaluation mix, Res. Policy, 42, 1647, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.005 · DOI
  40. Guerzoni, 2015, Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix, Res. Policy, 44, 726, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.009 · DOI
  41. Quitzow, 2015, Assessing policy strategies for the promotion of environmental technologies: a review of India's National Solar Mission, Res. Policy, 44, 233, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.003 · DOI
  42. Cantner, 2016, Inventor networks in renewable energies: the influence of the policy mix in Germany, Res. Policy, 45, 1165, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.005 · DOI
  43. Borrás, 2013, The choice of innovation policy instruments, Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change, 80, 1513, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002 · DOI
  44. Reichardt, 2016, Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany, Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change, 106, 11, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.029 · DOI
  45. Uyarra, 2016, Low carbon innovation and enterprise growth in the UK: challenges of a place-blind policy mix, Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change, 103, 264, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.008 · DOI
  46. Magro, 2014, Coordination-mix: the hidden face of STI policy, Rev. Policy Res., 31, 367, 10.1111/ropr.12090 · DOI
  47. Reichardt, 2017, Unpacking policy processes for addressing systemic problems in technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 80, 1217, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.280 · DOI
  48. Nilsson, 2012, Understanding policy coherence: analytical framework and examples of sector-environment policy interactions in the EU, Environ. Policy Gov., 22, 395, 10.1002/eet.1589 · DOI
  49. Palmer, 2011, Federal policies for renewable electricity: impacts and interactions, Energy Policy, 39, 3975, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.035 · DOI
  50. Oikonomou, 2008, A framework on interactions of climate and energy policy instruments, Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, 13, 131, 10.1007/s11027-007-9082-9 · DOI
  51. del Río, 2014, On evaluating success in complex policy mixes: the case of renewable energy support schemes, Policy Sci, 47, 267, 10.1007/s11077-013-9189-7 · DOI
  52. del Río, 2009, Interactions between climate and energy policies: the case of Spain, Clim. Policy, 9, 119, 10.3763/cpol.2007.0424 · DOI
  53. Rosenow, 2016, Energy efficiency and the policy mix, Build. Res. Inf., 44, 562, 10.1080/09613218.2016.1138803 · DOI
  54. Howlett, 2013, Tales from the Crypt: the rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design, Adm. Soc., 45, 357, 10.1177/0095399712459725 · DOI
  55. Howlett, 2014, From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance, Policy Sci., 47, 187, 10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0 · DOI
  56. Howlett, 2015, The parameters of policy portfolios: verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation, Environ. Plann. C, 33, 1233, 10.1177/0263774X15610059 · DOI
  57. Cashore, 2007, Punctuating which equilibrium?: understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in Pacific Northwest Forestry, Am. J. Polit. Sci., 51, 532, 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00266.x · DOI · Paper page
  58. Howlett, 2009, Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: a multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design, Policy Sci., 42, 73, 10.1007/s11077-009-9079-1 · DOI
  59. Grabosky, 1994, Green markets: environmental regulation by the private sector, Law Policy, 16, 419, 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1994.tb00132.x · DOI
  60. Yi, 2012, Policy tool interactions and the adoption of state renewable portfolio standards, Rev. Policy Res., 29, 193, 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00548.x · DOI
  61. Doremus, 2003, A policy portfolio approach to biodiversity protection on private lands, Environ. Sci. Policy, 6, 217, 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00036-4 · DOI
  62. Klijn, 2012, Governance network theory: past, present and future, Policy Polit., 40, 587, 10.1332/030557312X655431 · DOI
  63. Hou, 2010, Substitution and supplementation between co-functional policy instruments: evidence from state budget stabilization practices, Public Adm. Rev., 70, 914, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02223.x · DOI
  64. Kiss, 2013, The role of policy instruments in supporting the development of mineral wool insulation in Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom, J. Clean. Prod., 48, 187, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.016 · DOI
  65. Lecuyer, 2013, Can uncertainty justify overlapping policy instruments to mitigate emissions?, Ecol. Econ., 93, 177, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.009 · DOI
  66. Boonekamp, 2006, Actual interaction effects between policy measures for energy efficiency – a qualitative matrix method and quantitative simulation results for households, Energy, 31, 2848, 10.1016/j.energy.2006.01.004 · DOI
  67. del Río, 2011, Policies and design elements for the repowering of wind farms: a qualitative analysis of different options, Energy Policy, 39, 1897, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.035 · DOI
  68. Karltorp, 2012, Explaining regime destabilisation in the pulp and paper industry, Environ. Innovation Soc. Transitions, 2, 66, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.12.001 · DOI
  69. Turnheim, 2012, Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997), Energy Policy, 50, 35, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060 · DOI
  70. Turnheim, 2013, The destabilisation of existing regimes: confronting a multi-dimensional framework with a case study of the British coal industry (1913–1967), Res. Policy, 42, 1749, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.009 · DOI
  71. Avelino, 2016, The politics of sustainability transitions, J. Environ. Policy Plann., 18, 557, 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782 · DOI
  72. Markard, 2012, Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects, Res. Policy, 41, 955, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 · DOI
  73. Howlett, 2015, The parameters of policy portfolios: verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation, Environ. and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 1233, 10.1177/0263774X15610059 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Rogge, K. S., Kern, F., & Howlett, M.
Venue
Energy Research & Social Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
33
Pages
1-10
ISSN
2214-6296
DOI
10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.025
Cited by
270
References
3
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Research Council UK’s EUED Programme (EP/K011790/1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review