Cited by 520Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityDigital Transformation in LawClimate Change Policy and Economics

Decarbonizing Bitcoin: law and policy choices for reducing the energy consumption of Blockchain technologies and digital currencies

Truby, Jon·2018·Energy Research & Social Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.009

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Truby, J.
Affiliations
Qatar University (QA)
Corresponding author
Truby, Jon
Venue
Energy Research & Social Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
44
Pages
399-410
ISSN
2214-6296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884358933
Cited by
499
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 8
FWCI
70.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Energy Research & Social Science (publishedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Law
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
Bitcoin, blockchain, energy consumption, digital currency, decarbonization, climate change mitigation, greenhouse gas emissions, environmental externalities, fiscal policy, regulatory policy, sustainable development, Paris Agreement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review