Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEconomic theories and modelsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Peer effects and risk sharing in experimental asset markets

Open access
Gortner, Paul J., van der Weele, Joël J.·2019·European Economic Review
DOI 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.04.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.04.001

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bikhchandani, 1992, A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades, J. Polit. Econ., 100, 992, 10.1086/261849 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Fafchamps, 2015, Keep up with the winners: experimental evidence on risk taking, asset integration, and peer effects, Eur. Econ. Rev., 79, 59, 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.07.001 · DOI
  3. Hackethal, 2014, Information Diffusion in Financial Markets -- Evidence from Retail Investors, Goethe University Frankfurt, Mimeo, 2014, 1

Cited by

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Gortner, P. J., & van der Weele, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Deutsche Bundesbank (DE)
  • Tinbergen Institute (NL)
Corresponding author
van der Weele, Joël J.
ORCID
van der Weele, Joël J.
Venue
European Economic Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
116
Pages
129-147
ISSN
0014-2921 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.04.001
OpenAlex
W3122588938
Cited by
19
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
  • European Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (452-17-004)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
peer effects, risk sharing, social information, inequality aversion, asset markets, Arrow-Debreu economy, portfolio optimization, framing effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.