Cited by 59Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeTreatment of Major Depression

Cost of depression: effect of adherence and treatment response

von Knorring, L., Åkerblad, A.-C., Bengtsson, F., Carlsson, Å., Ekselius, L.·2006·European Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study has been to assess the societal cost of major depression and the distribution into different cost components. The impact of adherence and treatment response was also explored. METHOD: Data were collected from a randomized controlled trial of patients with major depressive disorder who were treated in a naturalistic primary care setting. Resource use and quality of life were followed during the two-year trial. RESULTS: The mean total cost per patient during two years was KSEK 363 (EUR 38 953). Indirect costs were the most important component (87%), whereas the cost of drugs was minor (4.5%). No significant differences in costs or quality of life between treatment arms or between adherent and non-adherent patients were demonstrated. However, treatment responders had 39% lower total costs per patient and experienced a larger increase in quality of life compared to non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: Major depression has high costs for society, primarily due to indirect costs. Treatment responders have considerably lower costs per patient and higher quality of life than non-responders. This indicates that measures to increase response rates are also important from an economic perspective.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.04.005

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Knorring, L., Åkerblad, A.-C., Bengtsson, F., Carlsson, Å., & Ekselius, L.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2006-09
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
349-354
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W2001501232
Cited by
58
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, medication adherence, treatment response, indirect costs, quality of life, resource utilization (health care), primary care, antidepressant treatment
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Demography, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Environment, Drug Monitoring, Health Care Costs, Sertraline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review