Cited by 231Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Transcranial direct current stimulation in severe, drug-resistant major depression

Ferrucci, R., Bortolomasi, M., Vergari, M., Tadini, L., Salvoro, B., Giacopuzzi, M., Barbieri, S., Priori, A.·2009·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Though antidepressant drugs are the treatment of choice for severe major depression, a number of patients do not improve with pharmacologic treatment. This study aimed to assess the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with severe, drug-resistant depression. Methods Fourteen hospitalized patients aged 37-68, with severe major depressive disorder according to DSM-IV.TR criteria, drug resistant, with high risk of suicide and referred for ECT were included. Mood was evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). We also administered cognitive tasks to evaluate the possible cognitive effects on memory and attention. tDCS was delivered over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPC) (2 mA, 20 min, anode left, cathode right) twice a day. Results After five days of treatment although cognitive performances remained unchanged, the BDI and HDRS scores improved more than 30% (BDI p=0.001; HDRS p=0.017). The mood improvement persisted and even increased at four (T2) weeks after treatment ended. The feeling of sadness and mood as evaluated by VAS improved after tDCS (Sadness p=0.007; Mood p=0.036). Conclusions We conclude that frontal tDCS is a simple, promising technique that can be considered in clinical practice as adjuvant treatment for hospitalized patients with severe, drug-resistant major depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2009.02.015

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferrucci, R., Bortolomasi, M., Vergari, M., Tadini, L., Salvoro, B., Giacopuzzi, M., Barbieri, S., & Priori, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
Corresponding author
Priori, A.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
118
Issue
1-3
Pages
215-219
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978696437
Cited by
228
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 12
FWCI
12.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, drug-resistant depression, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, adjuvant therapy, hospitalized patients, mood improvement, cognitive effects, attention and memory, suicide risk, electroconvulsive therapy
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Chronic Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Drug Resistance, Drug Therapy, Combination, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality Inventory, Treatment Outcome, Retreatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review