Cited by 19Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBirth, Development, and Health

Maternal personality traits and risk of preterm birth and fetal growth restriction

Chatzi, L., Koutra, K., Vassilaki, M., Vardiampasis, A., Georgiou, V., Koutis, A., Lionis, C., Bitsios, P. +1 more·2013·European Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Maternal personality may increase vulnerability to stress, which could lead to an unfavourable intrauterine environment to the fetus. We sought to investigate the impact of maternal personality traits on adverse birth outcomes such as preterm birth, and fetal growth restriction in the mother-child cohort study (RHEA Study) in Crete, Greece 2007-2009. METHODS: Five hundred and eighty pregnant women participating in "Rhea" cohort study completed the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) at 28-32 weeks of gestation. Information on anthropometric measures at birth was obtained from the hospital delivery logs and medical records. Fetal growth restriction was based on a customized model, and multivariate logistic regression models were used adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: A per unit increase in the EPQ Neuroticism scale increased the risk for fetal weight growth restriction by 9% [odds ratio (OR)=1.09, 95 percent CI: 1.01, 1.19)], and for fetal head circumference growth restriction by 6% [OR=1.06, 95 percent CI: 1.01, 1.18] after adjusting for maternal age, education, origin, marital status, working status, pre-pregnancy BMI, delivery type, parity, smoking, and alcohol intake during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal neuroticism, which predisposes to negative mood, may be a risk factor for fetal growth restriction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.11.006

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chatzi, L., Koutra, K., Vassilaki, M., Vardiampasis, A., Georgiou, V., Koutis, A., Lionis, C., Bitsios, P., & Kogevinas, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Crete (GR)
  • Center for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (ES)
Corresponding author
Chatzi, L.
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2012-04-24
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
213-218
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W2071135773
Cited by
19
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
maternal personality, neuroticism, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, fetal head circumference, fetal weight, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised, maternal stress, adverse birth outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Weight, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Age, Mothers, Personality, Personality Inventory, Pregnancy, Risk, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review