Cited by 151Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPregnancy-related medical research

Obstetric complications and anxiety during pregnancy: is there a relationship?

Johnson, R. C., Slade, P.·2003·Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

This review examines the contribution of recent research into the effects of anxiety during pregnancy. The focus of interest is upon the process of labor and delivery rather than its timing or the size of the baby. Therefore studies directed at areas of prematurity or low birthweight are specifically excluded as these have already been well evaluated in the literature. It is known that one proximal cause of obstetric complications is increased hormone levels in the uterus. It seems likely therefore that anxiety, a form of arousal, known to influence hormone levels, may be implicated as a distal determinant of obstetric complications. Attempts to evaluate this hypothesis have been hampered by methodological issues such as: poor definition and measurement of obstetric outcomes, in particular utilizing composite measures of diverse components; inappropriate measurements or over broad conceptualizations of anxiety; failure to account for confounding variables and inadequate sample sizes. On balance the evidence reviewed suggests that a general association between anxiety and obstetric complications per se does not exist, but specific types of anxiety, such as psychosocial stress, family functioning, or fear of childbirth may have associations with specific complications, such as prolonged labor or Cesarean section. Recent studies considering the effect of fear of childbirth, for example, on specific obstetric outcomes, such as type of delivery, have produced more clear-cut relationships. Recommendations for future research into the relationships between specific combinations of types of anxiety and individual obstetric complications are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/01674820309042796

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, R. C., & Slade, P.
Affiliations
  • Chesterfield Royal Hospital (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Slade, P.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2003-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0167-482X (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-8942
OpenAlex
W2166496808
Cited by
151
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
prenatal anxiety, pregnancy complications, labor and delivery, prolonged labor, cesarean section, fear of childbirth, psychosocial stress, family functioning
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Female, Humans, Obstetric Labor Complications, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Psychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review