Cited by 162Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Human prosociality from an evolutionary perspective: variation and correlations at a city-wide scale

Wilson, David Sloan, O'Brien, Daniel Tumminelli, Sesma, Artura·2009·Evolution and Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.12.002

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, D. S., O'Brien, D. T., & Sesma, A.
Affiliations
  • Binghamton University (US)
  • Search Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Wilson, David Sloan
Venue
Evolution and Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
190-200
ISSN
1090-5138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118045765
Cited by
162
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 15
FWCI
35.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Evolution and Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
prosocial behavior, social support, cooperation, evolutionary theory, neighborhood quality, social capital, public school students, Binghamton, New York

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review