Cited by 248Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsAntioxidants, Aging, Portulaca oleracea

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The limitations and validities of senescence associated-β-galactosidase activity as an aging marker for human foreskin fibroblast Hs68 cells

YANG, N, HU, M·2005·Experimental Gerontology

Abstract

The senescence associated-beta-galactosidase (SA-betaG) assay has become one of the most commonly used markers of cell-aging. However, the reliability of the assay is questionable because the enzyme is a non-specific marker for cell-aging. In this study, we found that the SA-betaG activity increased with cell age as well as in confluent quiescent cells or cells under serum starvation, and in cells treated with H2O2. Importantly, we found that SA-betaG activity was irreversibly increased in the senescent cells or H2O2-teated cells, but was reversible in quiescent cells induced by serum starvation or confluence. Using fluorescein di-beta-d-galactopyranoside (FDG) method for SA-betaG detection, we showed that senescent human foreskin fibroblast Hs68 cells did not express a specific enzyme that has a maximal activity at pH 6.0. In the pH profile of the cellular betaG activity in senescent Hs68 cells, only a single peak was found (with maximum at pH 4.6), and no addition peak was found at or around pH 6.0 that could be attributed to the SA-betaG activity. These results support the contention that SA-betaG is the lysosomal betaG that is detectable at suboptimal pH (i.e. pH 6.0) and demonstrate that cell-aging is not the only factor that can increase SA-betaG activity, rendering SA-betaG activity unspecific for cell-aging. Thus, the assay for cell-aging is only reliable when these confounding factors are controlled or excluded.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exger.2005.07.011

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
YANG, N., & HU, M.
Affiliations
National Chung Hsing University (TW)
Corresponding author
HU, M
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
40
Issue
10
Pages
813-819
ISSN
0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020595943
Cited by
245
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Antioxidants, Aging, Portulaca oleracea
Keywords
senescence-associated β-galactosidase, cellular senescence, aging markers, lysosomal beta-galactosidase, pH profile, serum deprivation, hydrogen peroxide, quiescent cells, assay specificity
MeSH terms
Aged, beta-Galactosidase, Cell Line, Fibroblasts, Histocytochemistry, Humans, Male, Models, Biological, Skin, Biomarkers, Cellular Senescence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review