Cited by 82Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The impact of wearable motion sensing technology on physical activity in older adults

Open access
Cooper, Carly, Gross, Anne, Brinkman, Chad, Pope, Ryan, Allen, Kelli, Hastings, Susan, Bogen, Bard E., Goode, Adam P.·2018·Experimental Gerontology

Abstract

Background and purpose Physical activity provides substantial health benefits. Older adults are less physically active than the rest of the population, and interventions that promote physical activity are needed. In this meta-analysis, we investigate how different wearable activity trackers (pedometers and accelerometers) may impact physical activity levels in older adults.Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL for randomized controlled trials including participants that were ≥65 years, using wearable activity trackers with the intent of increasing physical activity. Studies whose comparator groups were engaged in active or inactive interventions, such as continued a physical therapy program or goal-setting counseling, were not excluded simply for implementing co-interventions. We used random-effects models to produce standardized mean differences (SMDs) for physical activity outcomes. Heterogeneity was measured using I 2.Results Nine studies met the eligibility criteria: Four using accelerometers, four using pedometers, and one comparing accelerometers and pedometers, for a total number of 939 participants. Using pooled data, we found a statistically significant effect of using accelerometers (SMD = 0.43 (95%CI 0.19-0.68), I 2 = 1.6%, p = 0.298), but not by using pedometers (SMD = 0.17 (95%CI -0.08-0.43), I 2 = 37.7%, p = 0.174) for increasing physical activity levels.Discussion and conclusions In this study, we found that accelerometers, alone or in combination with other co-interventions, increased physical activity in older adults however pedometers were not found to increase physical activity. The high risk of bias found in most studies limits these findings. High quality studies that isolate the effects of accelerometers on physical activity changes are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exger.2018.08.002

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fewer than 50% of patients had their stroke or cardiovascular disease risk factors appropriately assessed, treated, or managed.

    “fewer than 50% of patients had their stroke or cardiovascular disease risk factors appropriately assessed, treated, or managed [3].”

    From Patient-Perceived Factors Influencing Physical Activity Sensor Use in Stroke Prevention and Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies Using Thematic Synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Methods and Results passages on risk of bias assess the quality of wearable-activity trials, not patients’ stroke or cardiovascular risk-factor care. The Introduction reports physical-activity rates in older adults, but not whether risk factors were assessed, treated, or managed. Searches for the quoted claim, stroke, and cardiovascular disease risk factors found no passage supporting the fewer-than-50% figure. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A comparable proportion of patients in an Australian stroke rehabilitation audit received information on self-management strategies or support programs.

    “a recent audit of stroke rehabilitation services in Australia revealed that a comparable proportion of patients received information on self-management strategies or support programs [3].”

    From Patient-Perceived Factors Influencing Physical Activity Sensor Use in Stroke Prevention and Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies Using Thematic Synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Results (Study Characteristics; page unavailable) describe exercise-counseling interventions in studies of older adults, not an Australian stroke rehabilitation audit. Searches for the audit and for stroke rehabilitation self-management information found no passage reporting the claimed proportion of patients. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Butler L, (2009b). Effects of a pedometer-based intervention on physical activity levels after cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention, 29(2), 105– 114 10.1097/HCR.0b013e31819a01ff 19305235 · DOI
  2. National Center for Health Statistics. (2016). Health, United States, 2015: With Special Feature on Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Retrieved from Hyattsville, MD: 27308685

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, C., Gross, A., Brinkman, C., Pope, R., Allen, K., Hastings, S., Bogen, B. E., & Goode, A. P.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Health Services Research & Development (US)
Corresponding author
Goode, Adam P.
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
112
Pages
9-19
ISSN
0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885442775
Cited by
82
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Center of Innovation for Health Services Research in Primary Care (CIN 13-410)
  • Duke Older Americans Independence Center (NIA P30 AG028716)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
wearable activity trackers, accelerometer, pedometers, physical activity, older adults, physical activity interventions, co-interventions, physical activity promotion
MeSH terms
Fitness Trackers, Wearable Electronic Devices, Aged, Humans, Exercise, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review