Cited by 547Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPhysical Activity and HealthBehavioral Health and Interventions

Behavior change techniques implemented in electronic lifestyle activity monitors: a systematic content analysis

Open access
Lyons, Elizabeth J, Lewis, Zakkoyya H, Mayrsohn, Brian G, Rowland, Jennifer L·2014·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic activity monitors (such as those manufactured by Fitbit, Jawbone, and Nike) improve on standard pedometers by providing automated feedback and interactive behavior change tools via mobile device or personal computer. These monitors are commercially popular and show promise for use in public health interventions. However, little is known about the content of their feedback applications and how individual monitors may differ from one another. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the behavior change techniques implemented in commercially available electronic activity monitors. METHODS: Electronic activity monitors (N=13) were systematically identified and tested by 3 trained coders for at least 1 week each. All monitors measured lifestyle physical activity and provided feedback via an app (computer or mobile). Coding was based on a hierarchical list of 93 behavior change techniques. Further coding of potentially effective techniques and adherence to theory-based recommendations were based on findings from meta-analyses and meta-regressions in the research literature. RESULTS: All monitors provided tools for self-monitoring, feedback, and environmental change by definition. The next most prevalent techniques (13 out of 13 monitors) were goal-setting and emphasizing discrepancy between current and goal behavior. Review of behavioral goals, social support, social comparison, prompts/cues, rewards, and a focus on past success were found in more than half of the systems. The monitors included a range of 5-10 of 14 total techniques identified from the research literature as potentially effective. Most of the monitors included goal-setting, self-monitoring, and feedback content that closely matched recommendations from social cognitive theory. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic activity monitors contain a wide range of behavior change techniques typically used in clinical behavioral interventions. Thus, the monitors may represent a medium by which these interventions could be translated for widespread use. This technology has broad applications for use in clinical, public health, and rehabilitation settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.3469

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyons, E. J., Lewis, Z. H., Mayrsohn, B. G., & Rowland, J. L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Lyons, Elizabeth J
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2014-08-15
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
e192
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077422864
Cited by
547
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (K12HD052023)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000071)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R24 HS22134, UL1TR000071, R24HS022134)
  • National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG024832)
  • NIH Office of the Director (K12HD052023)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Office of Research on Women's Health (K12HD052023)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD052023)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
behaviour change techniques, physical activity, pedometers, mobile health apps, self-monitoring, goal setting, social support, social comparison, prompts and cues, reward, social cognitive theory, Fitbit, jaw bone, Nike, public health interventions
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Life Style, Social Support, Health Behavior, Exercise, Telemedicine, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review