Cited by 22Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Fibromyalgia Impact and Mindfulness Characteristics in 4986 People with Fibromyalgia

Open access
Jones, Kim D., Mist, Scott D., Casselberry, Marie A., Ali, Ather, Christopher, Michael S.·2015·EXPLORE

Abstract

Context and objective A growing body of literature suggests that mindfulness techniques may be beneficial in fibromyalgia. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of six trials indicated improvement in depressive symptoms and quality of life, calling for increased rigor and use of standardized measures in future trials. The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between mindfulness [as measured by the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)] and fibromyalgia impact [as measured by the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR)]. Design, setting, and participants A cross-sectional survey was conducted with adults diagnosed with fibromyalgia from a national fibromyalgia advocacy foundation e-mail list. Results A total of 4986 respondents represented all 50 states in the United States and 30 countries. FIQR scores demonstrated moderate to severe fibromyalgia with the majority of subjects (59%) scoring ≤60. Scores on the FFMQ subscales ranged from 20.8 to 27.3, with highest scores for the observe subscale. All subscale correlations were small to moderate and indicated that more severe fibromyalgia impact was associated with less mindfulness except in the observe scale (r = .15, P > .000). No clinical or demographics explained as much variance in the FIQR total as any of the mindfulness subscales. Conclusions Fibromyalgia patients experience symptoms that may be alleviated by mindfulness interventions. Baseline values for the observe subscale of the FFMQ were unexpectedly high. Further research is needed to know if this may be due to non-mindful observations and should be noted when the FFMQ is used in fibromyalgia clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.explore.2015.04.006

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Describing, Acting-with-awareness, and Non-judging facets tend to show similar positive associations with psychological health.

    “The Describing, Acting-with-awareness, and Non-judging facets are often similarly associated with better psychological health.”

    From Mindfulness is associated with psychological health and moderates the impact of fibromyalgia (2019) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that greater fibromyalgia impact was associated with lower scores on Describing, Acting with Awareness, and Non-judging; the Results characterize the facet correlations as small to medium. This supports a shared direction of association in people with fibromyalgia, but the paper measures fibromyalgia impact rather than psychological health generally and does not establish that the three associations are similar in strength or occur often across settings. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The study sample had higher average total FFMQ scores than other community and clinical samples.

    “Our sample had higher average total Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) scores than other community and clinical samples in studies that measured FFMQ5,7,10,13,15,17”

    From Mindfulness is associated with psychological health and moderates the impact of fibromyalgia (2019) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Methods (Measures; page not available) confirm that this was a clinical sample assessed with the FFMQ. The Results report FFMQ subscale scores, but our copy gives no average total FFMQ score or comparison with the citing study’s sample, so it does not establish the claimed higher total score. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Nonjudging facet is particularly related to the functional impact of fibromyalgia, more so than the other FFMQ subscales.

    “The Nonjudging facet seems to be particularly related to the functional impact of FM [60] (more so than the other FFMQ subscales)”

    From The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis as a brain correlate of psychological inflexibility in fibromyalgia (2020) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Discussion reports that greater fibromyalgia impact was associated with lower scores on the Nonjudging facet. It reports the same pattern for three other FFMQ facets, however, and the passages available from our copy do not establish that Nonjudging was more strongly related to impact than those facets (Discussion and Results; page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The five facets of mindfulness have different relationships with health outcomes.

    “These facets of mindfulness differ in their associations with health outcomes.4–10,13–17”
  • The study sample had lower fibromyalgia impact scores than participants in two online fibromyalgia studies.

    “also had lower fibromyalgia impact scores than participants in two online fibromyalgia studies.15,44”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, K. D., Mist, S. D., Casselberry, M. A., Ali, A., & Christopher, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Pacific University (US)
Corresponding author
Jones, Kim D.
Venue
EXPLORE
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
304-309
ISSN
1550-8307 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973359620
Cited by
22
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EXPLORE (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (L30 AR065257)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT006703)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
fibromyalgia, mindfulness, Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, fibromyalgia impact, mindfulness-based interventions, quality of life, depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Meditation, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review