Cited by 48Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Development of interlaminar astroglial processes in the cerebral cortex of control and Down’s syndrome human cases.

Colombo, Jorge A., Reisin, Hernán D., Jones, Marta, Bentham, Carolina·2005·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Glial cytoarchitecture in human cerebral cortex is constituted by two overlapping layouts: the (general mammalian) "glial syncytium" and the (primate-specific) "interlaminar glial palisade" (IGP) composed by astroglial cells, with long, radial processes that traverse several supragranular layers. In this study, the emergence and early organization of the IGP was analyzed using immunocytochemical procedures in postmortem infantile human control and age matched, Down's syndrome (DS) cases. In control cases, first signs of a radial array of unbranched astroglial processes were apparent at the end of the period of "physiological astrocytosis" (20-40 days of postnatal life), and its general profile (except perhaps the density of cell processes) reached the adult-like configuration by the second month of life. The initial organization of the IGP was similar in control and DS cases, although a breakdown in DS became manifest by the first year of age, or earlier, albeit with individual variations. These changes tended to evolve in a "mosaic" fashion and included partial disruption of the palisade, or persistence of the "physiological astrocytosis". These observations were compared against samples from elder DS cases with an Alzheimer's type of dementia (AtD). Collectively, results suggest that DS also involves astroglial alterations during early stages of brain development, and that those changes progress with age, until an AtD ensues during adult life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.11.024

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ILAs start to be visible between 20 and 40 days after birth; at 40 days, perpendicular long GFAP-positive processes are visible in most cortical areas, although they typically do not exit layer I.

    “ILAs start to be visible between 20 and 40 days after birth; at 40 days, the perpendicular long GFAP-positive processes are visible in most cortical areas, although they typically do not exit layer I.”
  • Growth in length of ILAs is completed six months after birth.

    “Growth in length is completed six months after birth”
  • In adults with Down's syndrome, destruction of the typical ILA palisade is more pronounced, especially in the presence of amyloid plaques, with variability reflecting individual severity and clinical progression.

    “In adults, the destruction of the typical ILA palisade is even more pronounced, especially in the presence of amyloid plaques, with variability reflecting the individual severity and clinical progression of the syndrome.”
  • In Down's syndrome with Alzheimer's-type dementia, the ILA palisade is localized in "patches," mirroring the progression of Alzheimer's disease patients without DS.

    “DS often co-occurs with AD’s type of dementia, and in such cases, the ILA palisade is localized in “patches,” mirroring the progression of AD patients without DS.”
  • In Down's syndrome, no differences are observed between DS and healthy patients at birth; by 6 months of age, there is a general alteration of the tortuosity and parallelism typical of ILA long processes, becoming particularly visible by the end of the first year of life.

    “While no differences are observed between DS and healthy patients at birth, by 6 months of age, there is a general alteration of the tortuosity and parallelism typical of ILA long processes. These changes become particularly visible by the end of the first year of life (Colombo et al., 2005; Colombo and Reisin, 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colombo, J. A., Reisin, H. D., Jones, M., & Bentham, C.
Affiliations
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Colombo, Jorge A.
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
193
Issue
1
Pages
207-217
ISSN
0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988233442
Cited by
48
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Down syndrome, cortical development, postnatal brain development, infant brain
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Astrocytes, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Preschool, Down Syndrome, Female, Gliosis, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review