Cited by 290Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Structural abnormalities of the cerebral cortex in human chromosomal aberrations: a Golgi study

Marin-Padilla, Miguel·1972·Brain Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90324-1

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In all human chromosomal aberration syndromes, including trisomies, monosomies, polyploidies, disomies and imprinting errors or sex chromosome anomalies, structural abnormalities of (pre)frontal as well as many other areas are common.

    “In all human chromosomal aberration syndromes, including trisomies, monosomies (e.g., Turner syndrome, monosomy 1p36), polyploidies, disomies and imprinting errors or sex chromosome anomalies, structural abnormalities of (pre)frontal as well as many other areas are common [61, 288–292].”

    From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [290]

  • The spines that are present in Down syndrome exhibit morphological anomalies, such as abnormally small and exceptionally long, thin spines.

    “Moreover, the spines that are present exhibit morphological anomalies, such as abnormally small and exceptionally long, thin spines115–118 (Fig. 3a).”
  • The earliest reports using Golgi staining of human brain tissue provided consistent evidence that newborns and infants with Down syndrome have substantial deficits in spine density and abnormal spine morphology.

    “The earliest reports using Golgi staining of human brain tissue provided consistent evidence that newborns and infants with DS have substantial deficits in spine density and abnormal spine morphology115–118.”
  • These differences are present across the cortical laminae.

    “These differences are present across the cortical laminae115–118.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marin-Padilla, M.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1972-09
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
625-629
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090118472
Cited by
290
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
chromosomal abnormalities, cerebral cortex, structural abnormalities, synaptic remodeling, astrocytes, synaptogenesis, synaptic pruning, neuronal connectivity, neurological disorders
MeSH terms
Cerebral Cortex, Chromosome Aberrations, Chromosomes, Human, 13-15, Chromosomes, Human, 21-22 and Y, Dendrites, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Motor Cortex, Pregnancy, Pyramidal Tracts, Trisomy, Chromosome Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review