Cited by 235Berberine and alkaloids researchPlant-based Medicinal ResearchTraditional Chinese Medicine Analysis

Acute toxicity of berberine and its correlation with the blood concentration in mice

Kheir, Michael M., Wang, Yugang, Hua, Lei, Hu, Jun, Li, Lele, Lei, Fan, Du, Lijun·2010·Food and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the LD(50) (median lethal dosage) of berberine (BBR) through three different routes of injection in mice: intravenous (i.v.) injection, intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection, and intragastric (i.g.) oral administration. The concentration of BBR in blood from their i.g. doses (10.4, 20.8, 41.6, and 83.2 g/kg) and the content relationship of BBR among different injections were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The LD(50) of BBR from i.v. and i.p. injections is 9.0386 and 57.6103 mg/kg, respectively; but no LD(50) was found in the i.g. group. A significant difference in bioavailability was observed between the different routes. Furthermore, the concentration of BBR in the blood from different i.g. doses was also significantly different. However, we discovered an interesting phenomenon indicating that the absorption of BBR by oral administration has a limit, therefore, explaining the difficulty in obtaining an LD(50) of BBR for i.g. injection. From the analysis of BBR content in blood after various administrations, we hypothesized that not only does the concentration of BBR in blood contribute to its acute toxicity, but also the routes of administration may be an important facet that affects this toxicity evaluation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fct.2010.01.033

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kheir, M. M., Wang, Y., Hua, L., Hu, J., Li, L., Lei, F., & Du, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Du, Lijun
Venue
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
1105-1110
ISSN
0278-6915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016184231
Cited by
235
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Berberine and alkaloids research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Plant-based Medicinal Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
Keywords
berberine, acute toxicity, LD50, route of administration, bioavailability, blood concentration, oral absorption, intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection, intragastric administration, mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Berberine, Biological Availability, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Drug Administration Routes, Drugs, Chinese Herbal, Female, Lethal Dose 50, Male, Mice, Inbred ICR, Toxicity Tests, Acute, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review