Cited by 67Ovarian function and disordersAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Effect of metformin on serum visfatin levels in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

Open access
Ozkaya, Mesut, Cakal, Erman, Ustun, Yusuf, Engin-Ustun, Yaprak·2010·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To evaluate serum visfatin levels and to determine the effects of metformin treatment on visfatin levels in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).Design Cross-sectional study.Setting University hospital.Patient(s) Nineteen patients with PCOS and 21 controls.Intervention(s) Metformin was given to patients with PCOS, and serum visfatin levels were measured before and after treatment.Main outcome measure(s) Glucose, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, DHEAS, total T, insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and visfatin levels were measured.Result(s) Serum visfatin levels were significantly higher in women with PCOS than in controls. Visfatin could differentiate between women with and without increased diabetogenic risk at a cut-off value of 19.24 ng/mL, with a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 84%. In bivariate analysis of subjects, T, insulin, and waist circumference were significantly and positively correlated with visfatin. Treatment resulted in a significant decrease in body mass index and a decrease in visfatin concentration. After therapy, statistically significant decreases in HOMA-IR, fasting insulin, free T, and DHEAS concentrations were observed for the PCOS group.Conclusion(s) Circulating visfatin levels were higher in patients with PCOS than healthy controls, and metformin treatment significantly reduced circulating visfatin concentrations after 3 months of therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.058

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ozkaya, M., Cakal, E., Ustun, Y., & Engin-Ustun, Y.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
880-884
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165184461
Cited by
67
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
metformin, visfatin, polycystic ovary syndrome, insulin resistance, HOMA-IR, insulin, type 2 diabetes risk, body mass index, free testosterone, waist circumference
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Homeostasis, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin Resistance, Lipids, Metformin, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Body Mass Index, Cytokines, Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase, Waist Circumference, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review