Cited by 93Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsReproductive Biology and Fertility

Metformin therapy for the reproductive and metabolic consequences of polycystic ovary syndrome

Open access
Sam, Susan, Ehrmann, David A.·2017·Diabetologia

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the most common hormonal disorder among women of reproductive age, has various metabolic and reproductive consequences. Metformin was originally shown to lower testosterone levels in women with PCOS in the 1990s, an effect presumably related to its insulin sensitising actions. However, the precise mechanisms of metformin action in PCOS remain unclear and there is considerable heterogeneity in the clinical response to this therapy in women with PCOS. Recent evidence indicates that genetic factors may play a significant role in predicting response to metformin therapy in PCOS and future studies are needed to further identify women who are most likely to benefit from this therapy. At present, there is no clear evidence to support broad metformin use in PCOS. Well-designed prospective trials are needed to establish clear benefit for metformin use in the treatment of the reproductive and metabolic consequences associated with PCOS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-017-4306-3

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sam, S., & Ehrmann, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Sam, Susan
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2017-08-03
Volume
60
Issue
9
Pages
1656-1661
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2740419317
Cited by
93
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2012: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kovler Family Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, metformin, insulin sensitization, testosterone, insulin resistance, reproductive outcomes, metabolic effects, genetic predictors of treatment response, ovulation induction
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin Resistance, Metformin, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Reproduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review