Cited by 14Probiotics and Fermented FoodsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesFermentation and Sensory Analysis

Strain-specific metabolomic diversity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum under aerobic and anaerobic conditions

Open access
Kim, Su-Hyun, Singh, Digar, Kim, Seul-Ah, Kwak, Min Jeong, Cho, Donghyun, Kim, Juewon, Roh, Jong-Hwa, Kim, Wan-Gi +2 more·2023·Food Microbiology

Abstract

The chemotaxonomic diversity of 20 Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains was investigated using non-targeted metabolite profiling under different culture conditions. Multivariate and metabolic pathway analyses based on GC-MS and LC-MS/MS datasets showed that amino acid metabolism, especially 2-hydroxy acids, was enriched under aerobic conditions (AE), whereas fatty acid & sugar metabolism was increased under anaerobic conditions (AN). Based on the metabolite profiles, L. plantarum strains were clustered into three main groups (A, B, and C). Overall, 79 and 83 significantly discriminant metabolites were characterized as chemical markers of AE and AN growth conditions, respectively. Notably, alcohols were more abundant in group A whereas amino acids, peptides, purines, and pyrimidines were significantly higher in group C. 2-hydroxy acids and oxylipins biosynthesized through amino acid and fatty acid metabolism, respectively, were more abundant in groups A and B. Furthermore, we observed a strong correlation between the chemical diversity of L. plantarum groups and their antioxidant activity from metabolite extracts. We propose a non-targeted metabolomic workflow to comprehensively characterize the chemodiversity of L. plantarum strain under different culture conditions, which may help reveal specific biomarkers of individual strains depending on the culture conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fm.2023.104364

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, S.-H., Singh, D., Kim, S.-A., Kwak, M. J., Cho, D., Kim, J., Roh, J.-H., Kim, W.-G., Han, N. S., & Lee, C. H.
Affiliations
  • Chungbuk National University (KR)
  • Konkuk University (KR)
  • Amorepacific (South Korea) (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Choong Hwan
Venue
Food Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
116
Pages
104364
ISSN
0740-0020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385784019
Cited by
12
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Konkuk University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
Lactobacillus plantarum, oxylipins, amino acid metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, sugar metabolism, antioxidant activity, lactic acid bacteria
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Anaerobiosis, Chromatography, Liquid, Fatty Acids, Hydroxy Acids, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review