Cited by 219Global trade, sustainability, and social impactQuality and Management SystemsFood Safety and Hygiene

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The reliability of third-party certification in the food chain: From checklists to risk-oriented auditing

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.01.010

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Alderman, 1989, The case for risk-driven audits, Journal of Accountancy, 167, 55
  2. Amelung, C., Kiefer, S., Scherb, T., & Schwerdtle J. G. (2002). Qualitätssicherung bei Schweine- und Geflügelfleisch – Konzepte und praktische Umsetzung. In Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank, lebensmittelsicherheit und produkthaftung. neue entwicklungen in der integrierten produktion und vermarktung tierischer erzeugnisse (pp. 43–92), Frankfurt/Main.
  3. Brumfield, 1983, Business risk and the audit process, Journal of Accountancy, 155, 60
  4. EG (Eds.) (2002). Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002 of the European Parliament and the Council of 28 January 2002, Brussels.
  5. European Meat Alliance (EMA) (Eds.) (2006). Safe food transparently produced. <http://www.european-meat-alliance.eu/>.
  6. Graham, 1985, Audit risk – Part IV, The CPA-Journal, 38
  7. Graham, 1985, Audit risk – Part I, The CPA-Journal, 12
  8. Graham, 1985, Audit risk – Part II, The CPA-Journal, 34
  9. Graham, 1985, Audit risk – Part III, The CPA-Journal, 36
  10. Harney, 2005, Laying a false trail: How Chinese factories dupe western buyers and cheat their staff, Financial Times, 22
  11. Henson, H. (2006). The role of public and private standards in regulating international food markets. Paper prepared for the IATRC summer symposium “Food regulation and trade: Institutional framework, concepts of analysis and empirical evidence”, Bonn, Germany, May 28–30, 2006.
  12. Houghton, 1991, Inherent Risk, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10, 1
  13. Jensen, H. H., & Hayes, D. J. (2006). Private sector approaches to secure traceability, transparency and quality assurance in food chains. Paper prepared for the IATRC summer symposium “Food regulation and trade: Institutional framework, concepts of analysis and empirical evidence”, Bonn, Germany.
  14. Konrath, 1989, Classification of audit risk factors for planning and program design, The Ohio CPA Journal, 6
  15. O’Rourke, D. (2002). Monitoring the monitors: A critique of corporate third-party labour monitoring. In R. Jenkins, R. Pearson, & G. Seyfang (Eds.), Corporate responsibility and ethical trade: Codes of conduct in the global economy (pp. 196-208). London.
  16. Pechlivanos, L. (2004). Self-enforcing corruption: Information transmission and organizational response. In J. Lambsdorff, M. Schramm, & M. Taube (Eds.), Corruption and the new institutional economics (pp. 92–104). London.
  17. Schulze, H., Albersmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Spiller, A. (2006). Checklist governance: Risk-oriented audits to improve the quality of certification standards in the food sector. In Proceedings of 16th annual world food and agribusiness forum, symposium and case conference of the IAMA, Buenos Aires, Argentina, June 10–13, 2006.
  18. Wallace, W. A. (1991). Auditing (2nd ed.), Boston.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Albersmeier, F., Schulze, H., Jahn, G., & Spiller, A.
Affiliations
University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Albersmeier, Friederike
Venue
Food Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
927-935
ISSN
0956-7135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990240762
Cited by
219
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 8
FWCI
23.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Control (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Quality and Management Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
Keywords
third-party certification, food chain, risk-based auditing, checklists, international food standards, GlobalGAP, agribusiness, quality control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review