The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emotional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant- and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Potential of Insects as Food and Feed in Assuring Food Security
van Huis, A. (2013) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704 · Cited by 1,947
Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security
van Huis, A., Itterbeeck, J. V., Klunder, H. C., Mertens, E., Halloran, A., Muir, G., & Vantomme, P. (2013) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 1,694
Piqueras-Fiszman, B., & Spence, C. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.013 · Cited by 855
Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society
Verbeke, W. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008 · Cited by 849
Self-citationHoek, A. C., Luning, P. A., Weijzen, P., Engels, W., Kok, F. J., & de Graaf, C. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.001 · Cited by 757
Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance
Tan, H. S. G., Fischer, A. R. H., Tinchan, P., Stieger, M., Steenbekkers, L. P. A., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.013 · Cited by 500
Verbeke, W., Marcu, A., Rutsaert, P., Gaspar, R., Seibt, B., Fletcher, D., & Barnett, J. (2015) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013 · Cited by 390
Self-citationEdible Insects Acceptance by Belgian Consumers: Promising Attitude for Entomophagy Development
Caparros Megido, R., Sablon, L., Geuens, M., Brostaux, Y., Alabi, T., Blecker, C., Drugmand, D., Haubruge, É., & Francis, F. (2014) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/joss.12077 · Cited by 371
Evaluation of a rating-based variant of check-all-that-apply questions: Rate-all-that-apply (RATA)
Ares, G., Bruzzone, F., Vidal, L., Cadena, R. S., Giménez, A., Pineau, B., Hunter, D. C., Paisley, A. G., & Jaeger, S. R. (2014) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.03.006 · Cited by 325
Tan, H. S. G., Fischer, A. R. H., van Trijp, H. C. M., & Stieger, M. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.11.001 · Cited by 278
Cited by
Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production
Rubio, N. R., Xiang, N., & Kaplan, D. L. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20061-y · Cited by 606
Insects as food and feed, a new emerging agricultural sector: a review
van Huis, A. (2020) · Journal of Insects as Food and Feed · doi:10.3920/jiff2019.0017 · Cited by 544
Menozzi, D., Sogari, G., Veneziani, M., Simoni, E., & Mora, C. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.001 · Cited by 367
Mishyna, M., Chen, J., & Benjamin, O. (2020) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.11.016 · Cited by 309
Acceptance of Insect-Based Food Products in Western Societies: A Systematic Review
Kröger, T., Dupont, J., Büsing, L., & Fiebelkorn, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.759885 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Schouteten, J. J., De Steur, H., De Pelsmaeker, S., Lagast, S., Juvinal, J. G., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Verbeke, W., & Gellynck, X.
- Venue
- Food Quality and Preference
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 27-31
- ISSN
- 0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2304337790
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 20.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emotional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant- and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.011
- The paper
- Schouteten, J. J., De Steur, H., De Pelsmaeker, S., Lagast, S., Juvinal, J. G., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Verbeke, W., & Gellynck, X. (2016). Emotional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant- and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions. Food Quality and Preference. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
