CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 295Consumer Packaging Perceptions and TrendsEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessOrganic Food and Agriculture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Judging a product by its cover: Packaging sustainability and perceptions of quality in food products

Magnier, Lise, Schoormans, Jan, Mugge, Ruth·2016·Food Quality and Preference
DOI 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.06.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this paper, we test the influence of packaging sustainability on consumers’ perceived quality of food products using two experiments featuring raisins, chocolate bars and coffee. First, the results show that the perceived quality of a food product is more positive when it is packed in a sustainable packaging than when it is packed in a conventional packaging. Next, we demonstrate that product sustainability moderates the influence of packaging sustainability. Finally, we show that the perceived naturalness of the product induced by package and product sustainability explains the perception of product quality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.06.006

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gordon, 1994, The psychological effects of colour in consumer product packaging, Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–295 of 295

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Magnier, L., Schoormans, J., & Mugge, R.
Affiliations
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Magnier, Lise
ORCID
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
53
Pages
132-142
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.06.006
OpenAlex
W2421435468
Cited by
295
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 1
FWCI
41.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
Keywords
sustainable packaging, perceived quality, food packaging, consumer perception, product sustainability, perceived naturalness, moderating effect, raisins, chocolate bars, coffee

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review