The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant-based alternatives vs dairy milk: Consumer segments and their sensory, emotional, cognitive and situational use responses to tasted products
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Although soy has traditionally dominated this market because of its high protein content, mild flavor, and technofunctional properties, concerns regarding allergens, antinutritional factors, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), and its extensive use as animal feed have stimulated interest in alternative protein sources [22][23][24].”
From Valorization of Microalgae as Multifunctional Protein Sources in Plant-Based Systems: Structural, Functional, and Processing Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [24]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function
Ward, J. H. (1963) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845 · Cited by 21,341
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences.
Peryam, D. R., & Pilgrim, F. J. (1957) · Food technology · Cited by 1,344
Onwezen, M. C., Bouwman, E. P., Reinders, M. J., & Dagevos, H. (2020) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058 · Cited by 1,093
Plant-based milk alternatives an emerging segment of functional beverages: a review
Sethi, S., Tyagi, S., & Anurag, R. (2016) · Journal of food science and technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-016-2328-3 · Cited by 941
Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review
Hartmann, C., & Siegrist, M. (2017) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2016.12.006 · Cited by 884
Piqueras-Fiszman, B., & Spence, C. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.013 · Cited by 855
Hoek, A. C., Luning, P. A., Weijzen, P., Engels, W., Kok, F. J., & de Graaf, C. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.001 · Cited by 757
Nijdam, D., Rood, T., & Westhoek, H. (2012) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.08.002 · Cited by 734
The science of plant‐based foods: Constructing next‐generation meat, fish, milk, and egg analogs
McClements, D. J., & Großmann, L. (2021) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12771 · Cited by 666
Mäkinen, O. E., Wanhalinna, V., Zannini, E., & Arendt, E. K. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2012.761950 · Cited by 653
He, J., Evans, N. M., Liu, H., & Shao, S. (2020) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12610 · Cited by 603
What kind of exposure reduces children's food neophobia?
Birch, L. L., McPhee, L., Shoba, B. C., Pirok, E. W., & Steinberg, L. (1987) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(87)80011-9 · Cited by 585
Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers
Garnett, T. (2009) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.006 · Cited by 569
How well do plant based alternatives fare nutritionally compared to cow’s milk?
Vanga, S. K., & Raghavan, V. (2017) · Journal of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-017-2915-y · Cited by 520
Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data
Meyners, M., Castura, J. C., & Carr, B. T. (2013) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.06.010 · Cited by 514
Measurement of Food Preferences
MacFie, H. J. H., & THOMSON, D. M. H. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2171-6 · Cited by 506
Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations
Fox, N. J., & Ward, K. J. (2007) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.007 · Cited by 505
If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers
Slade, P. (2018) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030 · Cited by 504
Fermentation of plant-based milk alternatives for improved flavour and nutritional value
Tangyu, M., Muller, J. A., Bolten, C. J., & Wittmann, C. (2019) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-019-10175-9 · Cited by 476
Nutrient density and nutritional value of milk and plant-based milk alternatives
Chalupa-Krebzdak, S., Long, C. J., & Bohrer, B. M. (2018) · International Dairy Journal · doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2018.07.018 · Cited by 471
Henchion, M. M., MOLONEY, A. P., Hyland, J. J., Zimmermann, J., & McCarthy, S. N. (2021) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2021.100287 · Cited by 459
Health issues and technological aspects of plant-based alternative milk
Silva, A. R. A., Silva, M. M. N., & Ribeiro, B. D. (2020) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108972 · Cited by 408
Barbera, F. L., Verneau, F., Amato, M., & Grunert, K. G. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.002 · Cited by 401
Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution
Apostolidis, C., & McLeay, F. (2016) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.002 · Cited by 388
Jeske, S., Zannini, E., & Arendt, E. K. (2017) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.03.045 · Cited by 383
The nature and acquisition of a preference for chili pepper by humans
Rozin, P. N., & Schiller, D. (1980) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/bf00995932 · Cited by 355
EFFECTS OF DISCONFIRMED CONSUMER EXPECTATIONS ON FOOD ACCEPTABILITY
CARDELLO, A. V., & SAWYER, F. M. (1992) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.1992.tb00194.x · Cited by 352
Self-citationEvaluation of Physicochemical and Glycaemic Properties of Commercial Plant-Based Milk Substitutes
Jeske, S., Zannini, E., & Arendt, E. K. (2016) · Plant Foods for Human Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s11130-016-0583-0 · Cited by 349
Consumer expectations and their role in food acceptance
Cardello, A. V. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2171-6_10 · Cited by 330
Self-citationSchouteten, J. J., Steur, H. D., Pelsmaeker, S. D., Lagast, S., Juvinal, J., Bourdeaudhuij, I. D., Verbeke, W., & Gellynck, X. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.011 · Cited by 317
Hoek, A. C., Luning, P. A., Stafleu, A., & de Graaf, C. (2004) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2003.12.003 · Cited by 312
Radnitz, C. L., Beezhold, B., & DiMatteo, J. (2015) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.026 · Cited by 294
Van Loo, E. J., Hoefkens, C., & Verbeke, W. (2017) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.03.001 · Cited by 292
Reducing meat consumption in the USA: a nationally representative survey of attitudes and behaviours
Neff, R., Edwards, D. M., Palmer, A., Ramsing, R., Righter, A., & Wolfson, J. A. (2018) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980017004190 · Cited by 281
McCarthy, K. S., Parker, M., Ameerally, A., Drake, S. L., & Drake, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2016-12519 · Cited by 279
Haas, R., Schnepps, A., Pichler, A., & Meixner, O. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11185046 · Cited by 277
Public views of the benefits and barriers to the consumption of a plant-based diet
Lea, E. J., Crawford, D. A., & Worsley, A. F. (2006) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602387 · Cited by 266
Tan, H. S., van den Berg, E., & Stieger, M. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.05.003 · Cited by 255
Measuring emotional responses to foods and food names using questionnaires
Cardello, A. V., Meiselman, H. L., Schutz, H. G., Craig, C., Given, Z., Lesher, L. L., & Eicher, S. (2012) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.12.002 · Cited by 242
Self-citationMunekata, P. E. S., Domínguez, R., Budaraju, S., Roselló‐Soto, E., Barba, F. J., Mallikarjunan, K., Roohinejad, S., & Lorenzo, J. M. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9030288 · Cited by 228
Can carbon footprint serve as an indicator of the environmental impact of meat production?
Röös, E., Sundberg, C., Tidåker, P., Strid, I. V., & Hansson, P. (2012) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.004 · Cited by 225
Consumer Led Food Product Development
(2007) · doi:10.1201/9781439823903 · Cited by 223
Ares, G., & Jaeger, S. R. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1533/9781782422587.2.227 · Cited by 203
Self-citationStein, L. J., Nagai, H., Nakagawa, M., & Beauchamp, G. K. (2003) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(02)00173-3 · Cited by 194
Exploring meat substitutes: consumer experiences and contextual factors
Elzerman, J. E., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., & Luning, P. A. (2013) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070701311331490 · Cited by 178
Vainio, A., Niva, M., Jallinoja, P. T., & Latvala, T. (2016) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.03.002 · Cited by 178
Review: Effect of thermal processing on soymilk
Kwok, K., & Niranjan, K. (1995) · International Journal of Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1995.tb01377.x · Cited by 160
Önning, G., Wallmark, A., Persson, M., Åkesson, B., Elmståhl, S., & Öste, R. (1999) · Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1159/000012798 · Cited by 159
Development of novel plant-based milk based on chickpea and coconut
Rincon, L., Botelho, R. B. A., & de Alencar, E. R. (2020) · LWT · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109479 · Cited by 155
Aschemann‐Witzel, J., Ares, G., Thøgersen, J. B., & Monteleone, E. (2019) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.021 · Cited by 144
Measuring consumer expectations to improve food product development
Cardello, A. V. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1533/9781845693381.2.223 · Cited by 144
Self-citationThe contribution of sensory liking to overall liking: An analysis of six food categories
MOSKOWITZ, H. R., & Krieger, B. (1995) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/0950-3293(95)98552-t · Cited by 133
Food appropriateness measures as an adjunct to consumer preference/acceptability evaluation
Cardello, A. V., & Schutz, H. G. (1996) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(96)00012-2 · Cited by 130
Self-citationSituational appropriateness of beer is influenced by product familiarity
Giacalone, D., Frøst, M. B., Bredie, W. L. P., Pineau, B., Hunter, D. C., Paisley, A. G., Beresford, M. K., & Jaeger, S. R. (2014) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.012 · Cited by 127
Self-citationJang, S. S., & Kim, D. (2015) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.03.011 · Cited by 119
A Nutritional Comparison of Cow's Milk and Alternative Milk Products
Collard, K. M., & McCormick, D. P. (2020) · Academic Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.acap.2020.12.007 · Cited by 119
Cognitive and emotional differentiators for beer: An exploratory study focusing on “uniqueness”
Cardello, A. V., Pineau, B., Paisley, A. G., Roigard, C. M., Chheang, S. L., Guo, L. F., HEDDERLEY, D. I., & Jaeger, S. R. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.07.001 · Cited by 117
Self-citationParticle sizes and stability of UHT bovine, cereal and grain milks
Durand, A., Franks, G. V., & Hosken, R. W. (2003) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/s0268-005x(03)00012-2 · Cited by 113
Market mapping of plant-based milk alternatives by using sensory (RATA) and GC analysis
Vaikma, H., Kaleda, A., Rosend, J., & Rosenvald, S. (2021) · Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100049 · Cited by 112
Peanut Milk and Peanut Milk Based Products Production: A Review
Diarra, K., Nong, Z. G., & Jie, C. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408390590967685 · Cited by 111
Rapid Sensory Profiling Techniques
(2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-16502-6 · Cited by 111
Jaeger, S. R., & Giacalone, D. (2021) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110363 · Cited by 110
Self-citationDeterminants of consumer intention to purchase animal-friendly milk
de Graaf, S., Loo, E. J. V., Bijttebier, J., Vanhonacker, F., Lauwers, L., Tuyttens, F., & Verbeke, W. (2016) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2016-10886 · Cited by 107
Andersen, B. V., Brockhoff, P. B., & Hyldig, G. (2018) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.07.005 · Cited by 101
North, M., Klas, A., Ling, M., & Kothe, E. J. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105614 · Cited by 94
Jaeger, S. R., Worch, T., Phelps, T., Jin, D., & Cardello, A. V. (2020) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103884 · Cited by 87
Self-citationSENSORY CHARACTERISTICS AND CONSUMER LIKING FOR CEREAL BAR SNACK FOODS
Bower, J. A., & WHITTEN, R. (2000) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.2000.tb00274.x · Cited by 86
Wolf, C. A., Malone, T., & McFadden, B. R. (2020) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-18741 · Cited by 82
Relationships Between Food Preferences and Food Acceptance Ratings
Cardello, A. V., & Maller, O. (1982) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb04981.x · Cited by 80
Self-citationAppropriateness as a measure of the cognitive-contextual aspects of food acceptance
Schutz, H. G. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2171-6_2 · Cited by 80
Disconfirmed Hedonic Expectations Produce Perceptual Contrast, Not Assimilation
Zellner, D. A., Strickhouser, D., & Tornow, C. (2004) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/4149006 · Cited by 77
Elzerman, J. E., Keulemans, L., Sap, R., & Luning, P. A. (2020) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104108 · Cited by 76
MILK Symposium Introduction: Dairy production in developing countries
Adesogan, A. T., & Dahl, G. E. (2020) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-18313 · Cited by 75
Holistic and consumer-centric assessment of beer: A multi-measurement approach
Jaeger, S. R., Cardello, A. V., Chheang, S. L., Beresford, M. K., HEDDERLEY, D. I., & Pineau, B. (2017) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.004 · Cited by 72
Self-citationConsumers' health perceptions of three types of milk: a survey in Australia
Bus, A. E. M., & Worsley, A. F. (2003) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00004-7 · Cited by 69
Recommendations for use of balanced presentation order of terms in CATA questions
Ares, G., Reis, F., de Oliveira, D. C. R., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Chheang, S. L., Hunter, D. C., Kam, K., Roigard, C. M., et al. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.07.012 · Cited by 68
Self-citationConsumers' sensory and nutritional perceptions of three types of milk
Bus, A. E. M., & Worsley, A. (2003) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2002417 · Cited by 67
Meat: The Future Series - Alternative Proteins
Charles, H. (2019) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 60
Aidoo, H., Sakyi‐Dawson, E., Tano‐Debrah, K., & Saalia, F. K. (2009) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2009.08.018 · Cited by 57
Hedonic contrast and condensation: Good stimuli make mediocre stimuli less good and less different
Zellner, D. A., Allen, D., Henley, M., & Parker, S. (2006) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03193836 · Cited by 53
Palacios, O. M., Badran, J., Drake, M. A., Reisner, M., & MOSKOWITZ, H. R. (2009) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.2009.00236.x · Cited by 53
Sensory Acceptability and Proximate Composition of 3-Blend Plant-Based Dairy Alternatives
Oduro, A. F., Saalia, F. K., & Adjei, M. Y. B. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10030482 · Cited by 52
Are Plant-Based Analogues Replacing Cow’s Milk in the American Diet?
Stewart, H. G., Kuchler, F., Cessna, J., & Hahn, W. F. (2020) · Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics · doi:10.1017/aae.2020.16 · Cited by 45
Relative Importance of Color, Fruity Flavor and Sweetness in the Overall Liking of Soft Drinks
Tuorila, H., Mahlamäki‐Kultanen, S., & Kurkela, R. (1984) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb12852.x · Cited by 38
Kempen, E. L., Kasambala, J., Christie, L., Symington, E. A., Jooste, L., & van Eeden, T. (2016) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12331 · Cited by 37
Perceived Situational Appropriateness as a Predictor of Consumers' Food and Beverage Choices
Giacalone, D., & Jaeger, S. R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01743 · Cited by 37
Self-citationExpecting yoghurt drinks to taste sweet or pleasant increases liking
Kuenzel, J., Zandstra, E. H., El‐Deredy, W., Blanchette, I., & Thomas, A. K. (2010) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.12.009 · Cited by 36
The application of systematic steps for interventions towards meat-reduced diets
Onwezen, M. C. (2021) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.12.022 · Cited by 36
Thomson, D. M. H. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100508-8.00010-2 · Cited by 35
Increasing the Acceptance of Soy-Based Foods
Wansink, B. C., Sonka, S. T., Goldsmith, P., CHIRIBOGA, J., & Eren, N. (2005) · Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing · doi:10.1300/j047v17n01_03 · Cited by 34
The effect of viscosity and volume on pleasantness and satiating power of rice milk
Russell, K., & Delahunty, C. M. (2004) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2003.07.005 · Cited by 32
Plant-based Eggs: Views of Industry Practitioners and Experts
Rondoni, A., Millan, E. S., & Asioli, D. (2021) · Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing · doi:10.1080/08974438.2021.1915222 · Cited by 32
Study on Standardisation and Quality Evaluation of Peanut Milk by Different Processing Methods
Sakthi, T. S., Meenakshi, V., Kanchana, S., & Vellaikumar, S. (2020) · European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety · doi:10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i530228 · Cited by 26
DESAI, A., Small, D. M., McGill, A. E. J., & Shah, N. P. (2002) · Bioscience and Microflora · doi:10.12938/bifidus1996.21.245 · Cited by 24
Situational appropriateness in food-oriented consumer research: Concept, method, and applications
Giacalone, D. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814495-4.00006-4 · Cited by 24
Self-citationDisgust Reactions to Meat Among Ethically and Health Motivated Vegetarians
Hamilton, M. B. (2006) · Ecology of Food and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/03670240500530691 · Cited by 21
Pramudya, R. C., Lee, J., Chapko, M. J., Lee, K., Lee, S., Lee, J., Tokar, T., & Seo, H. (2019) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/joss.12496 · Cited by 18
Properties of a thermal-processed beverage prepared from roasted partially defatted peanuts
Hinds, M. J., Beuchat, L. R., & Chinnan, M. S. (1997) · International Journal of Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2621.1997.00402.x · Cited by 17
Prediction of frequency of food consumption from use attitude and demographic variables
Shepherd, R., Schutz, H. G., & SPARKS, P. B. (1993) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/0950-3293(93)90355-a · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Chen, S. (1989). Preparation of fluid soymilk. InT. H. Applewhite (Ed.), Proceedings of the world congress on vegetable protein utilization in human foods and animal feedstuffs(pp. 341-352). Champaign, Illinois, USA: American Oil Chemists’ Society.
- Euvepro. (2019). The use of plant-based proteins in foods and beverages in the EU. A 10- year review of new product launches containing plant-based proteins across EU 28. European Vegetable Protein Associate. Access on 10 Feb 2021 from https://euvepro.eu/_library/_files/INNOVA_2018_rep ort_summary_THE_USE_OF_PLANT-BASED_PROTEINS_IN_FOOD_AND_BEVERAGES_ IN_THE_EU.pdf.
- Onwezen, 2022, Positive emotions explain increased intention to consume five types of alternative proteins between 2015 and 2019, Food Quality and Preference, 159
- Schutz, 1981, Consumer perception of the relative importance of appearance, flavor and texture to food acceptance, Criteria of Food Acceptance, 97
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Giacalone, D., Clausen, M. P., & Jaeger, S. R. (2022) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100919 · Cited by 260
Self-citationConsumer acceptance of novel sustainable food technologies: A multi-country survey
Giacalone, D., & Jaeger, S. R. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137119 · Cited by 195
Self-citationAppiani, M., Cattaneo, C., & Laureati, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023.1268068 · Cited by 162
Plant-Based Dairy Alternatives—A Future Direction to the Milky Way
Plamada, D., Teleky, B., Nemeș, S. A., Mitrea, L., Szabo, K., Călinoiu, L. F., Pascuta, M. S., Varvara, R.-A., Ciont, C., Martău, G. A., et al. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12091883 · Cited by 127
Moss, R. H., LeBlanc, J., Gorman, M., Ritchie, C., Duizer, L. M., & McSweeney, M. B. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12081709 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Cardello, A. V., Llobell, F., Giacalone, D., Roigard, C. M., & Jaeger, S. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Plant & Food Research (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Jaeger, Sara R.
- Venue
- Food Quality and Preference
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 100
- Pages
- 104599
- ISSN
- 0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4223946989
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 9
- FWCI
- 18.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- MBIE
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- plant-based milk alternatives, dairy milk, sensory perception, product liking, soy milk, oat milk, cashew milk, rice milk, coconut milk, full-fat dairy, check-all-that-apply
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review