Cited by 31Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementEcology and biodiversity studies

After long-term decline, are aspen recovering in northern Yellowstone?

Painter, Luke E., Beschta, Robert L., Larsen, Eric J., Ripple, William J.·2014·Forest Ecology and Management

Abstract

In northern Yellowstone National Park, quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) stands were dying out in the late 20th century following decades of intensive browsing by Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus). In 1995–1996 gray wolves (Canis lupus) were reintroduced, joining bears (Ursus spp.) and cougars (Puma concolor) to complete the guild of large carnivores that prey on elk. This was followed by a marked decline in elk density and change in elk distribution during the years 1997–2012, due in part to increased predation. We hypothesized that these changes would result in less browsing and an increase in height of young aspen. In 2012, we sampled 87 randomly selected stands in northern Yellowstone, and compared our data to baseline measurements from 1997 and 1998. Browsing rates (the percentage of leaders browsed annually) in 1997–1998 were consistently high, averaging 88%, and only 1% of young aspen in sample plots were taller than 100cm; none were taller than 200cm. In 2012, browsing rates were much lower at 44%, and young aspen were taller on average with 34% >100cm and 5% >200cm. Most (62%) of the variation in height of young aspen in 2012 was explained by browsing intensity. Furthermore, in 2012, 25% of stands had at least five aspen saplings tall enough to escape elk browsing (⩾200cm spring height), a condition that has not occurred for decades and happened despite a recent drought. Sapling recruitment did not increase until browsing decreased, following substantial changes…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.055

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Browsing pressure was reduced and more spatially variable, and subsequent aspen studies reported new recruitment of aspen saplings.

    “Browsing pressure was reduced and more spatially variable, and subsequent aspen studies reported new recruitment of aspen saplings (Beschta et al., 2023; Painter et al., 2014, 2015; Ripple & Beschta, 2007, 2012).”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Painter et al., 2014

  • In northern Yellowstone, herbivory has been the primary factor limiting the growth of aspen from sprouts to saplings, and eventually trees.

    “Recent trends toward a warmer and drier climate may cause additional stress (Kulakowski et al., 2013; Worrall et al., 2013), but in northern Yellowstone herbivory has been the primary factor limiting the growth of aspen from sprouts to saplings, and eventually trees (Beschta et al., 2016; Kay, 2018; Painter et al., 2014, 2018).”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Painter et al., 2014

  • Willow recovery, like aspen recovery, began in the early 2000s during a time of drought and has continued under a long-term warming and drying trend.

    “willow recovery, like aspen recovery, began in the early 2000s during a time of drought (McMenamin et al. 2008, Painter et al. 2014) and has continued under a long-term warming and drying trend.”

    From Tall willow thickets return to northern Yellowstone (2020) · cites this paper as Painter et al. 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Painter, L. E., Beschta, R. L., Larsen, E. J., & Ripple, W. J.
Affiliations
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point (US)
Corresponding author
Painter, Luke E.
Venue
Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
329
Pages
108-117
ISSN
0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085438120
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Wyoming – National Park Service Research Station
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
Keywords
Populus tremuloides, elk browsing, Rocky Mountain elk, gray wolf reintroduction, sapling recruitment, browsing intensity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review