CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 53

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sexual dimorphism of facial appearance in ageing human adults: A cross-sectional study

Mydlová, Miriama, Dupej, Ján, Koudelová, Jana, Velemínská, Jana·2015·Forensic Science International
DOI 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.09.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the forensic sciences, knowledge of facial ageing is very important in searching for both dead and living individuals. Ageing estimations typically model the biological profile, which can be compared to missing persons. The main goals of this current study were to construct ageing trajectories for adult human faces of both sexes and evaluate sexual dimorphism in relation to static allometry. Our study was based on the analysis of three-dimensional facial surface models of 194 individuals 20-80 years of age. The evaluation consisted of a dense correspondence analysis of facial scans and multivariate statistics. It was shown that both age and sex have a significant influence on facial form and shape. Male features included a longer face, with more protruded foreheads, eyebrow ridges and nose, including the region under the upper lip and mandible region, but more retruded cheeks compared to females. Ageing in both sexes shared common traits, such as more pronounced roundness of the face (rectangular in males), decreased facial convexity, increased visibility of skin folds and wrinkles connected with the loss of skin elasticity, and soft tissue stretching, especially in the orbital area and lower face; however, male faces exhibited more intense ageing changes. The above-mentioned sexual dimorphic traits tended to diminish in the elderly age category, though overall sexual dimorphism was heightened with age. The static allometric relationships between size and form or shape wer…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.09.008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Progress in computer science and improvements to medical imaging technologies have led to the development of computer systems for forensic facial reconstruction or for three-dimensional modelling of facial ageing using longitudinal and cross-sectional data.

    “Progress in computer science and improvements to medical imaging technologies have led to the development of computer systems for forensic facial reconstruction [21,22] or for three-dimensional modelling of facial ageing using longitudinal [23,24] and cross-sectional data [25].”

    From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [24]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Nassif, 1999, Aesthetic facial analysis, Facial Plast. Surg. Clin. North Am., 7, 1, 10.1016/S1064-7406(23)00187-6 · DOI
  2. Albert, 2007, A review of the literature on the aging adult skull and face: implications for forensic science research and applications, Forensic Sci. Int., 172, 1, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.03.015 · DOI
  3. Ferrario, 1993, Sexual dimorphism in the human face assessed by Euclidean distance matrix analysis, J. Anat., 183, 593
  4. Velemínská, 2012, Surface facial modelling and allometry in relation to sexual dimorphism, HOMO – J. Comp. Hum. Biol., 63, 81, 10.1016/j.jchb.2012.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Hennessy, 2002, Geometric morphometric study of the regional variation of modern human craniofacial form, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 117, 37, 10.1002/ajpa.10005 · DOI
  6. Hennessy, 2005, Facial surface analysis by 3D laser scanning and geometric morphometrics in relation to sexual dimorphism in cerebral-craniofacial morphogenesis and cognitive function, J. Anat., 207, 283, 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00444.x · DOI
  7. Hennessy, 2010, Frontonasal dysmorphology in bipolar disorder by 3D laser surface imaging and geometric morphometrics: comparisons with schizophrenia, Schizophr. Res., 122, 63, 10.1016/j.schres.2010.05.001 · DOI
  8. Coleman, 2006, The anatomy of the aging face: volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography, Aesthet. Surg. J., 26, S4, 10.1016/j.asj.2005.09.012 · DOI
  9. Le Louarn, 2007, Botulinum toxin and the Face Recurve concept: decreasing resting tone and muscular regeneration, Ann. Chir. Plast. Esthét., 52, 165, 10.1016/j.anplas.2006.11.007 · DOI
  10. Bartlett, 1992, Age-related changes of the craniofacial skeleton: an anthropometric and histologic analysis, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 90, 592, 10.1097/00006534-199210000-00007 · DOI
  11. Pessa, 1999, Concertina effect and facial aging: nonlinear aspects of youthfulness and skeletal remodeling, and why, perhaps, infants have jowls, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 103, 635, 10.1097/00006534-199902000-00042 · DOI
  12. Rosati, 2014, The labial aging process: a surface analysis-based three-dimensional evaluation, Aesthetic Plast. Surg., 38, 236, 10.1007/s00266-013-0227-9 · DOI
  13. Bishara, 1998, Soft tissue profile changes from 5 to 45 years of age, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 114, 698, 10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70203-3 · DOI
  14. Ferrario, 1995, Fourier analysis of human soft tissue facial shape: sex differences in normal adults, J. Anat., 187, 593
  15. Samal, 2007, Analysis of sexual dimorphism in human face, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent., 18, 453, 10.1016/j.jvcir.2007.04.010 · DOI
  16. Bulygina, 2006, Ontogeny of facial dimorphism and patterns of individual development within one human population, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 131, 432, 10.1002/ajpa.20317 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Agnihotri, 2007, Craniofacial anthropometry in newborns and infants, Iran. J. Pediatr., 17, 332
  18. Frayer, 1985, Sexual dimorphism, Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 14, 429, 10.1146/annurev.an.14.100185.002241 · DOI
  19. Suazo, 2012, Age effect in the morphological traits performance for sex determination in human skulls and mandibles, Int. J. Morphol., 30, 296, 10.4067/S0717-95022012000100053 · DOI
  20. Weiss, 1972, On the systematic bias in skeletal sexing, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 37, 239, 10.1002/ajpa.1330370208 · DOI
  21. Meindl, 1985, Accuracy and direction of error in the sexing of the skeleton: implications for paleodemography, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 68, 79, 10.1002/ajpa.1330680108 · DOI
  22. Walker, 2008, Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 136, 39, 10.1002/ajpa.20776 · DOI
  23. Doual, 1997, The influence of senescence on craniofacial and cervical morphology in humans, Surg. Radiol. Anat., 19, 175, 10.1007/BF01627970 · DOI
  24. Beardall, 1983, Muscle atrophy during starvation in a marine teleost, Eur. J. Cell Biol., 29, 209
  25. Mitch, 2000, Mechanisms accelerating muscle atrophy in catabolic diseases, Trans. Am. Clin. Climatol. Assoc., 111, 258
  26. Suazo, 2008, Evaluating accuracy and precision in morphologic traits for sexual dimorphism in malnutrition human skull: a comparative study, Int. J. Morphol., 26, 876
  27. Suazo, 2009, Performance evaluation as a diagnostic test for traditional methods for forensic identification of sex, Int. J. Morphol., 27, 381
  28. Bookstein, 1989, Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 11, 567, 10.1109/34.24792 · DOI
  29. Claes, 2014, Modeling 3D facial shape from DNA, PLoS Genet., 10, e1004224, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004224 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Peres-Neto, 2005, How many principal components? Stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 2005, 974, 10.1016/j.csda.2004.06.015 · DOI
  31. Anderson, 2006, Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions, Biometrics, 62, 245, 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00440.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. Snodell, 1993, A longitudinal cephalometric study of transverse and vertical craniofacial growth, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 104, 471, 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70073-W · DOI
  33. Ferrario, 1997, Effect of growth and development on cephalometric shapes in orthodontic patients: a Fourier analysis, Eur. J. Orthod., 19, 669, 10.1093/ejo/19.6.669 · DOI
  34. Ferrario, 1998, Facial volume changes during normal human growth and development, Anat. Rec., 250, 480, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199804)250:4<480::AID-AR12>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  35. Borgognini Tarli, 1986, Methodological considerations on the study of sexual dimorphism in past human populations, Hum. Evol., 1, 51, 10.1007/BF02437285 · DOI
  36. Shirakabe, 2003, A new paradigm for the aging Asian face, Aesthetic Plast. Surg., 27, 397, 10.1007/s00266-003-2099-x · DOI
  37. Osunwoke, 2011, Sexual dimorphism in facial dimensions of the Bini's of South-Southern Nigeria, Asian J. Med. Sci., 3, 71
  38. Miyajima, 1996, Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 110, 431, 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70047-1 · DOI
  39. Vojdani, 2009, Cephalometry in 14–18 years old girls and boys of Shiraz-Iran high school, Int. J. Morphol., 27, 101, 10.4067/S0717-95022009000100018 · DOI
  40. Sforza, 2009, Age- and sex-related changes in the soft tissues of the orbital region, Forensic Sci. Int., 185, e1
  41. Sforza, 2011, Age- and sex-related changes in the normal human external nose, Forensic Sci. Int., 204, 205.e1, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.07.027 · DOI
  42. Gualdi-Russo, 1998, Longitudinal study of anthropometric changes with aging in an urban Italian population, HOMO – J. Comp. Hum. Biol., 49, 241
  43. Pecora, 2008, The aging craniofacial complex: a longitudinal cephalometric study from late adolescence to late adulthood, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 134, 496, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.11.022 · DOI
  44. Little, 2006, Craniofacial dimensions in children in rural Oaxaca, Southern Mexico: Secular change, 1968–2000, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 131, 127, 10.1002/ajpa.20406 · DOI
  45. Formby, 1994, Longitudinal changes in the adult facial profile, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 105, 464, 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70007-9 · DOI
  46. West, 1999, Changes in the craniofacial complex from adolescence to midadulthood: a cephalometric study, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 115, 521, 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70274-X · DOI
  47. Sforza, 2010, Age- and sex-related changes in three-dimensional lip morphology, Forensic Sci. Int., 200, 182.e1, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.050 · DOI
  48. Kimmerle, 2008, Sexual dimorphism in America: geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region*, J. Forensic Sci., 53, 54, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00627.x · DOI
  49. Gonzalez, 2011, Analysis of sexual dimorphism of craniofacial traits using geometric morphometric techniques, Int. J. Osteoarchaeol., 21, 82, 10.1002/oa.1109 · DOI
  50. Fink, 2005, Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape, Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci., 272, 1995, 10.1098/rspb.2005.3179 · DOI
  51. Koudelová, 2015, Modelling of facial growth in Czech children based on longitudinal data: age progression from 12 to 15 years using 3D surface models, Forensic Sci. Int., 248, 33, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Ferrario, 2003, Growth and aging of facial soft tissues: a computerized three-dimensional mesh diagram analysis, Clin. Anat., 16, 420, 10.1002/ca.10154 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Rosas, 2002, Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 117, 236, 10.1002/ajpa.10023 · DOI
  54. Claes, 2012, Sexual dimorphism in multiple aspects of 3D facial symmetry and asymmetry defined by spatially dense geometric morphometrics, J. Anat., 221, 97, 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01528.x · DOI
  55. Toma, 2008, A three-dimensional look for facial differences between males and females in a British-Caucasian sample aged 151/2 years old, Orthod. Craniofac. Res., 11, 180, 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2008.00428.x · DOI
  56. Zankl, 2002, Growth charts for nose length, nasal protrusion, and philtrum length from birth to 97 years, Am. J. Med. Genet., 111, 388, 10.1002/ajmg.10472 · DOI
  57. Bastir, 2011, Common features of sexual dimorphism in the cranial airways of different human populations, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 146, 414, 10.1002/ajpa.21596 · DOI
  58. De Menezes, 2011, Three-dimensional analysis of labial morphology: effect of sex and age, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 40, 856, 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.03.004 · DOI
  59. Okada, 2013, Facial changes caused by smoking: a comparison between smoking and nonsmoking identical twins, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 132, 1085, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a4c20a · DOI
  60. Douchi, 1998, The effect of menopause on regional and total body lean mass, Maturitas, 29, 247, 10.1016/S0378-5122(98)00035-8 · DOI
  61. Lee, 2012, A classification method of normal and overweight females based on facial features for automated medical applications, J. Biomed. Biotechnol., 2012, 1
  62. Cheverud, 1982, Relationships among ontogenetic, static, and evolutionary allometry, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 59, 139, 10.1002/ajpa.1330590204 · DOI
  63. Sanger, 2013, Convergent evolution of sexual dimorphism in skull shape using distinct developmental strategies, Evolution, 67, 2180, 10.1111/evo.12100 · DOI
  64. Mitteroecker, 2013, A brief review of shape, form, and allometry in geometric morphometrics, with applications to human facial morphology, Hystrix Ital. J. Mammal., 24, 59

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mydlová, M., Dupej, J., Koudelová, J., & Velemínská, J.
Venue
Forensic Science International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
257
Pages
519.e1-519.e9
ISSN
0379-0738
DOI
10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.09.008
Cited by
53
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
GAUK (674812, 1388213)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review