Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fate of inorganic material during hydrothermal carbonisation of biomass: Influence of feedstock on combustion behaviour of hydrochar

Smith, Aidan M., Singh, Surjit, Ross, Andrew B.·2016·Fuel

Abstract

Abstract A series of high moisture content biomass have been processed by hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) in a batch reactor at two temperatures (200 °C and 250 °C). The feedstocks processed include food waste, secondary sewage sludge, AD press cake, microalgae, macroalgae and a fibre derived from municipal derived wastes. In addition, three lignocellulosic biomass including miscanthus, willow and oak wood have been processed under identical conditions. The yields and properties of the resulting hydrochars including their HHV, CHNS, mineral content and ash fusibility properties have been determined and compared with their starting biomass. Typical char yields for lignocellulosic material range between 58 and 70 wt% at 200 °C and reduce to 40–46 wt% at 250 °C. The behaviour and mass balance is however very feedstock dependent and the higher lignin biomass produce higher yields of hydrochar. There is a significant upgrading of the energy density of the hydrochars with calculated HHV ranging from typically 24 MJ kg −1 at 200 °C to 28–31 MJ kg −1 at 250 °C for lignocellulosic material. The exception is for sewage sludge and AD press cake which result in a significant solubilisation of organic matter. A significant removal of alkali metals is observed and this in turn changes the ash chemistry upon combustion. This change in ash chemistry has been shown to change the ash melting behaviour and the hemisphere temperatures (oxidising conditions) were seen to increase substantially. A number of predictive slagging and fouling indices have been used to evaluate the influence of the ash chemistry on the fuel combustion behaviour and this combined with the ash fusion testing has shown that HTC reduces the potential fouling and slagging in some of the resulting hydrochars if combusted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.12.006

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Smith, A. M., Singh, S., & Ross, A. B.
Venue
Fuel
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
169
Pages
135-145
ISSN
0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2211346451
Cited by
359
References
29
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fate of inorganic material during hydrothermal carbonisation of biomass: Influence of feedstock on combustion behaviour of hydrochar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.12.006
The paper
Smith, A. M., Singh, S., & Ross, A. B. (2016). Fate of inorganic material during hydrothermal carbonisation of biomass: Influence of feedstock on combustion behaviour of hydrochar. Fuel. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.12.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.