The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-key privacy-preserving deep learning in cloud computing
Open accessAbstract
Deep learning has attracted a lot of attention and has been applied successfully in many areas such as bioinformatics, imaging processing, game playing and computer security etc. On the other hand, deep learning usually requires a lot of training data which may not be provided by a sole owner. As the volume of data gets huge, it is common for users to store their data in a third-party cloud. Due to the confidentiality of the data, data are usually stored in encrypted form. To apply deep learning to these datasets owned by multiple data owners on cloud, we need to tackle two challenges: (i) the data are encrypted with different keys, all operations including intermediate results must be secure; and (ii) the computational cost and the communication cost of the data owner(s) should be kept minimal. In our work, we propose two schemes to solve the above problems. We first present a basic scheme based on multi-key fully homomorphic encryption (MK-FHE), then we propose an advanced scheme based on a hybrid structure by combining the double decryption mechanism and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE). We also prove that these two multi-key privacy-preserving deep learning schemes over encrypted data are secure. In the basic scheme, we use M-FHE as our privacy-preserving technique. Only the decrypt operation needs the interaction among data owners.In the advanced scheme, we propose a hybrid structure scheme by combining the double decryption mechanism and FHE.In the advanced scheme, only the encrypt and decrypt algorithms are performed by data providers.We prove that these two multi-key privacy-preserving deep learning schemes over encrypted data are secure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks
Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127647 · Cited by 20,928
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260
Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks
Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., & Hinton, G. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638947 · Cited by 8,893
Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices
Gentry, C. (2009) · Proceedings of the forty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/1536414.1536440 · Cited by 6,806
Deep Learning with Differential Privacy
Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2976749.2978318 · Cited by 6,578
Privacy-preserving data mining
Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335438 · Cited by 2,961
Goldwasser, S., & Micali, S. (1984) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(84)90070-9 · Cited by 2,603
Privacy-preserving deep learning
Shokri, R., & Shmatikov, V. (2015) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2810103.2813687 · Cited by 2,356
(Leveled) fully homomorphic encryption without bootstrapping
Brakerski, Z., Gentry, C., & Vaikuntanathan, V. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090262 · Cited by 1,782
Evaluating 2-DNF Formulas on Ciphertexts
Boneh, D., Goh, E.-J., & Nissim, K. (2005) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30576-7_18 · Cited by 1,692
PCANet: A Simple Deep Learning Baseline for Image Classification?
Chan, T.-H., Jia, K., Gao, S., Lu, J., Zeng, Z., & Ma, Y. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2015.2475625 · Cited by 1,362
On-the-fly multiparty computation on the cloud via multikey fully homomorphic encryption
López-Alt, A., Tromer, E., & Vaikuntanathan, V. (2012) · Proceedings of the forty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/2213977.2214086 · Cited by 910
Secure Deduplication with Efficient and Reliable Convergent Key Management
Li, J., Chen, X., Li, M., Li, J., Lee, P. P. C., & Lou, W. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2013.284 · Cited by 549
Self-citationA General Survey of Privacy-Preserving Data Mining Models and Algorithms
Aggarwal, C. C., & Yu, P. S. (2008) · Advances in Database Systems · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70992-5_2 · Cited by 469
ML Confidential: Machine Learning on Encrypted Data
Graepel, T., Lauter, K., & Naehrig, M. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37682-5_1 · Cited by 423
Privacy-preserving distributed k-means clustering over arbitrarily partitioned data
Jagannathan, G., & Wright, R. N. (2005) · Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining · doi:10.1145/1081870.1081942 · Cited by 420
A Hybrid Cloud Approach for Secure Authorized Deduplication
Li, J., Li, Y. K., Chen, X., Lee, P. P. C., & Lou, W. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2014.2318320 · Cited by 412
Self-citationPrivacy-Preserving Multivariate Statistical Analysis: Linear Regression and Classification
Du, W., Han, Y. S., & Chen, S. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611972740.21 · Cited by 366
A Simple Public-Key Cryptosystem with a Double Trapdoor Decryption Mechanism and Its Applications
Bresson, E., Catalano, D., & Pointcheval, D. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-40061-5_3 · Cited by 355
Cloud computing adoption framework: A security framework for business clouds
Chang, V. I. C., Kuo, Y., & Ramachandran, M. (2015) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2015.09.031 · Cited by 341
Two Round Multiparty Computation via Multi-key FHE
Mukherjee, P., & Wichs, D. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49896-5_26 · Cited by 308
Towards Achieving Data Security with the Cloud Computing Adoption Framework
Chang, V., & Ramachandran, M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2015.2491281 · Cited by 286
Privacy Preserving Deep Computation Model on Cloud for Big Data Feature Learning
Zhang, Q., Yang, L. T., & Chen, Z. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2015.2470255 · Cited by 286
(2011) · Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5906-5_1332 · Cited by 281
Privacy Preserving Back-Propagation Neural Network Learning Made Practical with Cloud Computing
Yuan, J., & Yu, S. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2013.18 · Cited by 242
Integrative data analysis of multi-platform cancer data with a multimodal deep learning approach
Liang, M., Li, Z., Chen, T., & Zeng, J. (2015) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2014.2377729 · Cited by 231
Dynamic Differential Privacy for ADMM-Based Distributed Classification Learning
Zhang, T., & Zhu, Q. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2016.2607691 · Cited by 202
Vijayakumar, P., Chang, V., Jegatha Deborah, L., Balusamy, B., & Shynu, P. G. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.11.024 · Cited by 201
Grossman, R. L., USA, K. T. E. A. S. I. C. O. K. D. A. D. M. 2. C. I., Association for Computing Machinery-Digital Library, ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data, ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data, & SIGs, A. (2005) · Cited by 179
Secure Distributed Deduplication Systems with Improved Reliability
Li, J., Chen, X., Huang, X., Tang, S., Xiang, Y., Hassan, M. M., & Alelaiwi, A. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2015.2401017 · Cited by 160
Self-citationProceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference
(2012) · doi:10.1145/2090236 · Cited by 150
Towards a Big Data system disaster recovery in a Private Cloud
Chang, V. I. C. (2015) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2015.07.012 · Cited by 142
Differential Privacy: From Theory to Practice
Li, N., Lyu, M., Su, D., & Yang, W. (2016) · Synthesis lectures on information security, privacy, and trust · doi:10.2200/s00735ed1v01y201609spt018 · Cited by 129
Privacy-Preserving Backpropagation Neural Network Learning
Chen, T., & Zhong, S. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2009.2026902 · Cited by 127
Privacy preserving Back-propagation neural network learning over arbitrarily partitioned data
Bansal, A., Chen, T., & Zhong, S. (2010) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-010-0346-z · Cited by 97
L2P2: A location-label based approach for privacy preserving in LBS
Sun, G., Liao, D., Li, H., Yu, H., & Chang, V. I. C. (2016) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.08.023 · Cited by 95
User-defined privacy location-sharing system in mobile online social networks
Sun, G., Xie, Y., Liao, D., Yu, H., & Chang, V. I. C. (2016) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2016.11.024 · Cited by 76
Privacy-Preserving Data Mining
Evfimievski, A., & Grandison, T. W. A. (2009) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-242-8.ch056 · Cited by 55
ABE with improved auxiliary input for big data security
Wang, Z., Cao, C., Yang, N., & Chang, V. I. C. (2016) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jcss.2016.12.006 · Cited by 38
Privacy-Preserving Data Mining
Branković, L., Islam, M. Z., & Giggins, H. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69861-6_11 · Cited by 24
Cited by
Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
Lim, W. Y. B., Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Jiao, Y., Liang, Y.-C., Yang, Q., Niyato, D., & Miao, C. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2986024 · Cited by 2,565
A Survey of Deep Learning: Platforms, Applications and Emerging Research Trends
Hatcher, W. G., & Yu, W. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2830661 · Cited by 654
Significant Permission Identification for Machine-Learning-Based Android Malware Detection
Li, J., Sun, L., Yan, Q., Li, Z., Srisa-an, W., & Ye, H. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2017.2789219 · Cited by 607
Self-citationWhen Machine Learning Meets Privacy: A Survey and Outlook
Liu, B., Ding, M., Shaham, S., Rahayu, W., Farokhi, F., & Lin, Z. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3436755 · Cited by 455
Luo, S., Chen, X., Wu, Q., Zhou, Z., & Yu, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2020.3003744 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, P., Li, J., Huang, Z., Li, T., Gao, C.-Z., Yiu, S.-M., & Chen, K.
- Venue
- Future Generation Computer Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 76-85
- ISSN
- 0167-739X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2597998853
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 39.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
