The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Cited by
Humans display a ‘cooperative phenotype’ that is domain general and temporally stable
Peysakhovich, A., Nowak, M. A., & Rand, D. G. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5939 · Cited by 426
Homo Moralis--Preference Evolution Under Incomplete Information and Assortative Matching
(2013) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta10637 · Cited by 371
Competition Policy and Productivity Growth: An Empirical Assessment
Buccirossi, P., Ciari, L., Duso, T., Spagnolo, G., & Vitale, C. (2013) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00304 · Cited by 316
Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization?
Haucap, J., & Heimeshoff, U. (2014) · International Economics and Economic Policy · doi:10.1007/s10368-013-0247-6 · Cited by 302
Voting on the threat of exclusion in a public goods experiment
Dannenberg, A., Haita-Falah, C., & Zitzelsberger, S. (2020) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-019-09609-y · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Blanco, M., Engelmann, D., & Normann, H. T.
- Venue
- Games and Economic Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 321-338
- ISSN
- 0899-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3122520600
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 176.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.geb.2010.09.008
- The paper
- Blanco, M., Engelmann, D., & Normann, H. T. (2011). A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences. Games and Economic Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2010.09.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
