Cited by 426Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Humans display a ‘cooperative phenotype’ that is domain general and temporally stable

Open access
Peysakhovich, Alexander, Nowak, Martin A., Rand, David G.·2014·Nature Communications

Abstract

Understanding human cooperation is of major interest across the natural and social sciences. But it is unclear to what extent cooperation is actually a general concept. Most research on cooperation has implicitly assumed that a person's behaviour in one cooperative context is related to their behaviour in other settings, and at later times. However, there is little empirical evidence in support of this assumption. Here, we provide such evidence by collecting thousands of game decisions from over 1,400 individuals. A person's decisions in different cooperation games are correlated, as are those decisions and both self-report and real-effort measures of cooperation in non-game contexts. Equally strong correlations exist between cooperative decisions made an average of 124 days apart. Importantly, we find that cooperation is not correlated with norm-enforcing punishment or non-competitiveness. We conclude that there is a domain-general and temporally stable inclination towards paying costs to benefit others, which we dub the 'cooperative phenotype'.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms5939

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Moral values appear to be deeply-held, stable across time, and resistant to change.

    “However, since moral values appear to be deeply-held, stable across time, and resistant to change 11 – 13 , a parallel literature on moral cognition makes a different prediction: insofar as punishment is a method of restoring justice following a moral violation, punitive preferences should be less susceptible to group influence.”

    From Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions (2019) · cites this paper as [12]

    The ‘Stability of game play over time’ section reports that cooperative game behavior remained correlated across measurements months apart. The paper does not establish that moral values generally are deeply held or resistant to change; its temporal finding concerns cooperation behavior, not moral values broadly. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Stochastic transitions in social structures can arise from the effects of weather, animal migration and movement, and role reversal.

    “Stochastic transitions in social structures can arise from the effects of weather, animal migration and movement, and role reversal [47].”

    From Strategy evolution on dynamic networks (2023) · cites this paper as [47]

    The “Stability of game play over time” section examines whether individuals’ cooperation in online games remains stable; it does not discuss transitions in social structures. Searches for weather, migration, movement, role reversal, and stochastic changes found no passage addressing the claimed causes. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peysakhovich, A., Nowak, M. A., & Rand, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rand, David G.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2014-09-16
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
4939-4939
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3124682720
Cited by
426
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
FWCI
104.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
human cooperation, domain generality, temporal stability, inter-individual consistency, cooperation games, self-report measures, prosocial behavior
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Decision Making, Biological Evolution, Game Theory, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Phenotype, Punishment, Time Factors, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review