CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advancing accountability theory and practice: Introduction to the human resource management review special edition

Frink, Dwight D, Klimoski, Richard J·2004·Human Resource Management Review
DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Adelberg, 1978, Accountability and helping: When needs exceed resources, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 343, 10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.343 · DOI
  2. Brief, 1991, Resolving ethical dilemmas in management: Experimental investigations of values, accountability, and choice, Journal of Applied Psychology, 21, 380, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00526.x · DOI
  3. Conger, 1988, The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice, Academy of Management Review, 13, 471, 10.5465/amr.1988.4306983 · DOI
  4. Dose, 1995, Doing the right thing in the workplace: Responsibility in the face of accountability, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 8, 35, 10.1007/BF02621254 · DOI
  5. Frink, 1998, Accountability, impression management, and goal setting in the performance evaluation process, Human Relations, 51, 1259, 10.1177/001872679805101003 · DOI
  6. Frink, 1999, The moderating effects of accountability on the conscientiousness–performance relationship, Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 515, 10.1023/A:1022918904256 · DOI
  7. Frink, 1998, Toward a theory of accountability in organizations and human resources management, vol. 16, 1
  8. Gordon, 1988, The effect of applicant age, job level and accountability on the evaluation of job applicants, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 20, 10.1016/0749-5978(88)90044-1 · DOI
  9. Jensen, 1976, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305, 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X · DOI · Paper page
  10. Klimoski, 1974, Accountability and negotiator behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 409, 10.1016/0030-5073(74)90029-4 · DOI
  11. Louis, 1980, Surprise and sensemaking: What newcomers experience when entering unfamiliar organizational settings, Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226, 10.2307/2392453 · DOI
  12. Morrison, 1993, Longitudinal study of the effects of information seeking on newcomer socialization, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 173, 10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.173 · DOI
  13. Pfeffer, 1981, Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms, vol. 3, 1
  14. Salancik, 1978, A social information processing approach to job attitudes and job design, Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224, 10.2307/2392563 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Schlenker, 1994, The triangle model of responsibility, Psychological Review, 101, 632, 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.632 · DOI
  16. Tetlock, 1985, Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice, vol. 7, 297
  17. Tetlock, 1992, The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model, vol. 25, 331
  18. Tetlock, 1989, Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability Conformity complexity and blostering, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 632, 10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.632 · DOI
  19. Wyer, 1986, Human cognition in its social context, Psychological Review, 93, 322, 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.322 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J.
Venue
Human Resource Management Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1-17
ISSN
1053-4822
DOI
10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.001
Cited by
163
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review