Cited by 290Cultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

The Strength of Social Norms Across Human Groups

Gelfand, Michele J., Harrington, Jesse R., Jackson, Joshua Conrad·2017·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Social norms are a defining feature of human psychology, yet our understanding of them is still underdeveloped. In this article, we present our own cross-cultural research program on tightness-looseness (TL)—which draws on field, experimental, computational, and neuroscience methods—to illustrate how going beyond Western borders is critical for understanding social norms’ functions and their multilevel consequences. Cross-cultural research enables us to account for the universal features of norm psychology but also explains the great cultural diversity we see in social norms around the globe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691617708631

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cultures tighten in the face of ecological threat.

    “According to past research, cultures tighten in the face of ecological threat [24–26].”
  • TL theory holds that, during times of threat, groups and individuals gravitate towards cultural tightness because tighter norms can better maintain societal order, stability, and coordination.

    “TL theory holds that, during times of threat, groups and individuals gravitate towards cultural tightness because tighter norms can better maintain societal order, stability, and coordination [24–26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gelfand, M. J., Harrington, J. R., & Jackson, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Harrington, Jesse R.
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2017-09
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
800-809
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2763678018
Cited by
290
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
28.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
social norms, tightness-looseness, cross-cultural psychology, norm enforcement
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Humans, Cultural Diversity, Social Norms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review