The DOI matches its Crossref record; 153 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 76 of the 179 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope
Open accessAbstract
Robert S. Sheldon, Blair P. Grubb II, Brian Olshansky, Win-Kuang Shen, Hugh Calkins, Michele Brignole, Satish R. Raj, Andrew D. Krahn, Carlos A. Morillo, Julian M. Stewart, Richard Sutton, Paola Sandroni, Karen J. Friday, Denise Tessariol Hachul, Mitchell I. Cohen, Dennis H. Lau, Kenneth A. Mayuga, Jeffrey P. Moak, Roopinder K. Sandhu, Khalil Kanjwal
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
78 No basis given · 39 No full text of the sources · 32 Partly supported · 15 Supported · 14 Own interpretation · 7 Not checked yet · 5 Own method · 4 Supported so far · 2 Mixed support · 2 Couldn’t confirm · 1 Not supported · accuracy not yet measured
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“None of the studies were conventional, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials of moderately to severely symptomatic patients.125–128”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [125] Samniah, 2001, Efficacy and safety of midodrine hydrochloride in patients with refractory vasovagal syncope, Am J Cardiol source
- Supportedcites [126] Perez-Lugones, 2001, Usefulness of midodrine in patients with severely symptomatic neurocardiogenic syncope: a randomized control study, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol source
The Methods describe randomizing patients with at least monthly syncope to midodrine or fluid therapy, salt tablets, and counseling—not to a placebo. Thus, although this was a randomized study of severely symptomatic patients, it was not a conventional placebo-controlled trial. The Results occasionally call the comparison group a “placebo arm,” but describe its treatment as fluid and salt therapy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Disputedcites [127] Ward, 1998, Midodrine: a role in the management of neurocardiogenic syncope, Heart sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Patients and methods section describes a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled midodrine trial, contrary to the claim that none of the cited studies had those features. The Abstract describes participants with frequent symptoms—more than two syncopal episodes and fewer than 20 symptom-free days per month. The trial used a crossover design, so it was not a conventional parallel-group trial, but the source does not support the blanket characterization. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [128] Qingyou, 2006, The efficacy of midodrine hydrochloride in the treatment of children with vasovagal syncope, J Pediatr source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
At least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“A small and underpowered crossover study reported the efficacy of low-dose midodrine in participants who had previously been trained in physical counterpressure man-euevres.124”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Disputedcites [124] Romme, 2011, Effectiveness of midodrine treatment in patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope not responding to non-pharmacological treatment (STAND-trial), Europace sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods describe a small crossover trial using 5 mg of midodrine twice daily in patients who had received non-pharmacological treatment, including physical counterpressure manoeuvres. But the Discussion explicitly says the trial was unable to demonstrate midodrine’s effectiveness in these patients—the opposite of the claimed efficacy. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Disputed
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The standing (or orthostatic) heart rate of individuals with POTS is often ≥120 bpm,8–13”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [8] Schondorf, 1993, Idiopathic postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: an attenuated form of acute pandysautonomia?, Neurology source
- Not matchedcites [9] Low, 1995, Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), Neurology
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [10] Freeman, 2011, Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome, Auton Neurosci source
- Supportedcites [11] Singer, 2012, Postural tachycardia in children and adolescents: what is abnormal?, J Pediatr source
The paper’s introductory passage states that most authors include an absolute orthostatic heart rate of at least 120 bpm in POTS diagnostic criteria. The Discussion’s proposed pediatric criteria set a threshold of at least 120 bpm for ages 14 and older and at least 130 bpm for younger children. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [12] Garland, 2007, The hemodynamic and neurohumoral phenotype of postural tachycardia syndrome, Neurology source
- Supportedcites [13] Low, 2009, Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol source
The Abstract’s Introduction defines POTS as an orthostatic heart-rate increase usually reaching at least 120 bpm. This supports the citing sentence’s description of the standing heart rate as often ≥120 bpm; no page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It is believed that impaired sympathetic tone (as measured by norepinephrine spillover) reduces venoconstriction, leading to venous pooling in the lower limbs and splanchnic beds.24”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [24] Jacob, 2000, The neuropathic postural tachycardia syndrome, N Engl J Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The discussion (section 2.0; page unavailable) links impaired norepinephrine spillover to noradrenergic dysfunction in the legs and discusses minimizing orthostatic blood pooling in the lower body. It does not establish reduced venoconstriction or pooling in splanchnic beds; instead, it suggests that sympathetic neurons in organs such as the mesentery remain intact. (LLM, conf=0.86)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“During a vasovagal syncope episode, an ineffective reflex response causes venous pooling in the periphery and/or splanchnic regions.73–76”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [73] Mosqueda-Garcia, 2000, The elusive pathophysiology of neurally mediated syncope, Circulation sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Postural NMS” (page unavailable), the review describes evidence suggesting increased peripheral pooling in people prone to syncope and reports a failure of reflex venoconstriction during exercise. It also cites evidence against exaggerated pooling. The paper does not establish that an ineffective reflex causes peripheral or splanchnic pooling during a syncope episode; the claim states a proposed, contested mechanism as fact. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [74] Glick, 1963, Hemodynamic changes during spontaneous vasovagal reactions, Am J Med source
- Partly supportedcites [75] Hargreaves, 1992, Lack of variation in venous tone potentiates vasovagal syncope, Br Heart J sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract and Discussion report greater calf venous blood volume and less variable venous tone during head-up tilt in patients who fainted. The authors propose that an inadequate peripheral venous response may help trigger syncope, but they do not establish it as a cause or assess splanchnic pooling. They also distinguish this proposed venous abnormality from generalized autonomic dysfunction. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [76] Manyari, 1996, Abnormal reflex venous function in patients with neuromediated syncope, J Am Coll Cardiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports greater calf venous pooling during tilt-induced syncope and suggests that reduced venous responsiveness to sympathetic stimulation may explain it. The paper’s own forearm measurements were taken during mental stress, not a syncopal episode; it does not establish the proposed reflex mechanism as a cause or address splanchnic pooling. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Approximately 60% of patients with POTS treated with ivabradine in an open-label study had symptom improvement.44”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Treatment
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [44] McDonald, 2011, Single centre experience of ivabradine in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, Europace source
The Conclusion states that 60% of patients treated with ivabradine reported symptomatic improvement. The Methods describe a retrospective, self-reported assessment rather than a blinded trial, consistent with the citing sentence’s open-label description. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Paradoxically, some of these patients have low plasma renin activity and aldosterone levels compared with healthy subjects.32”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [32] Raj, 2005, Renin-aldosterone paradox and perturbed blood volume regulation underlying postural tachycardia syndrome, Circulation sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Renin and Aldosterone results report significantly lower aldosterone in patients with POTS than in healthy controls, both supine and upright. They report no difference in plasma renin activity in either position. The paper calls renin inappropriately low relative to the patients’ reduced plasma volume, not lower than the controls’ renin activity. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The strongest evidence to date comes from a small, randomized crossover study in which 21 patients with IST were randomized to placebo or ivabradine 5 mg twice daily for a total of 12 weeks.63”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 2: Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia Definition > Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [63] Cappato, 2012, Clinical efficacy of ivabradine in patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover evaluation, J oAm Coll Cardiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report 21 enrolled patients, and Study design describes a randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial with two six-week treatment phases separated by a seven-day washout. Ivabradine started at 5 mg twice daily, but Effects of ivabradine on symptoms and HR reports that the dose was increased in 11 patients and decreased in two; 5 mg twice daily was therefore not the fixed dose throughout. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plainn = 21- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Long-acting propranolol does not improve the quality of life of patients with POTS,43”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Treatment
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [43] Fu, 2011, Exercise training versus propranolol in the treatment of the postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, Hypertension source
The Discussion (‘Effects of Propranolol in POTS’) states that after four weeks of long-acting propranolol, patient quality of life remained unchanged. The Results (‘Propranolol Treatment’) report the same finding in POTS patients. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Most patients stop fainting after assessment and in the absence of specific therapy.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Epidemiology and Natural History
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [69] Chen, 2003, Prevalence and clinical outcomes of patients with multiple potential causes of syncope, Mayo Clin Proc source
- Could not verifycites [70] Brignole, 2006, A new management of syncope: prospective systematic guideline-based evaluation of patients referred urgently to general hospitals, Eur Heart J sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Diagnosis section (p. 3) reports how often vasovagal syncope was identified, but not whether patients subsequently stopped fainting. The Discussion (p. 6) says the study did not collect follow-up or prognosis data, so our copy cannot verify the claimed outcome after assessment without specific therapy. (LLM, conf=0.79)
- Could not verifycites [71] D’Ascenzo, 2013, Incidence, etiology and predictors of adverse outcomes in 43,315 patients presenting to the Emergency Department with syncope: an international meta-analysis, Int J Cardiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion says situational, orthostatic or vasovagal causes accounted for up to one third of cases, and Table 5 reports how many patients were discharged home. Neither reports whether most patients stopped fainting after assessment or did so without specific therapy. Searches for that wording and for recurrence without treatment found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Barón-Esquivias, 2004, Long-term outcome of patients with vasovagal syncope, Am Heart J source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Reports from tertiary care centers have indicated that up to 50% of patients with POTS have a restricted autonomic neuropathy of small and distal postganglionic sudomotor fibers,19,20 predominantly of the feet and toes.21–23”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [19] Peltier, 2010, Distal sudomotor findings in postural tachycardia syndrome, Clin Auton Res sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report abnormal QSART in 17 of 30 women with POTS (57%), most often at the foot or proximal leg, and the Discussion identifies QSART as a test of postganglionic sudomotor fibers. But the Discussion describes the deficits as patchy and less suggestive of a distal-predominant neuropathy. The paper therefore supports frequent lower-extremity sudomotor abnormalities, not the claim that up to half of POTS patients have the stated restricted neuropathy, predominantly in the feet and toes. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [20] Singer, 2004, Prospective evaluation of somatic and autonomic small fibers in selected autonomic neuropathies, Neurology source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [21] Low, 1994, Comparison of the postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) with orthostatic hypotension due to autonomic failure, J Auton Nerv Syst source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [22] Vogel, 2005, Blood pressure recovery from Valsalva maneuver in patients with autonomic failure, Neurology source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] Sandroni, 2000, Mechanisms of blood pressure alterations in response to the Valsalva maneuver in postural tachycardia syndrome, Clin Auton Res source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This neuropathic manifestation of POTS requires a high cardiac output to compensate for reduced splanchnic and peripheral resistance and venous pooling.25–28”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [25] Stewart, 2004, Decreased skeletal muscle pump activity in patients with postural tachycardia syndrome and low peripheral blood flow, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol source
- Partly supportedcites [26] Stewart, 2006, Persistent splanchnic hyperemia during upright tilt in postural tachycardia syndrome, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (page unavailable) report increased cardiac index and decreased total peripheral resistance in high-flow POTS. The Discussion (page unavailable) reports splanchnic pooling in normal-flow POTS, but describes peripheral vasoconstriction—not reduced peripheral resistance—in that group. The paper does not establish that neuropathic POTS requires high cardiac output to compensate for both reduced splanchnic and peripheral resistance and venous pooling. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [27] Stewart, 2004, Regional blood volume and peripheral blood flow in postural tachycardia syndrome, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) describes high-flow POTS as neuropathic and associates reduced peripheral resistance with increased cardiac output and lower-extremity fluid collection. It does not establish reduced splanchnic resistance or say that high cardiac output is required to compensate for venous pooling; it identifies splanchnic pooling with normal-flow POTS. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not matchedcites [28] Tani, 1999, Splanchnic and systemic circulation in the postural tachycardia syndrome, Clin Auton Res
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In contrast, the normal blood pressure phenotype features increased norepinephrine transporter levels consistent with augmented norepinephrine reuptake.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [87] Vaddadi, 2011, Recurrent postural vasovagal syncope: sympathetic nervous system phenotypes, Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol source
The Abstract reports increased norepinephrine transporter levels in the normal blood pressure phenotype and describes them as augmenting transmitter reuptake. The Cellular: SNPs section likewise reports elevated transporter levels, while presenting increased reuptake as the probable mechanism rather than a directly measured effect. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Diagnostic scores have been developed based on patients with rigorously defined diagnoses.90–93”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [90] Sheldon, 2010, Syncope and structural heart disease: historical criteria for vasovagal syncope and ventricular tachycardia, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [91] Sheldon, 2006, Diagnostic criteria for vasovagal syncope based on a quantitative history, Eur Heart J source
- Partly supportedcites [92] Sheldon, 2002, Historical criteria that distinguish syncope from seizures, J Am Coll Cardiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Patient selection section says participants had diagnoses established by preset criteria without reasonable diagnostic confusion; vasovagal syncope required a positive tilt test. The Discussion says the resulting point score distinguished syncope from seizures, not vasovagal syncope specifically, and that schemes for distinguishing causes of syncope were still being developed. Page numbers were not supplied for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [93] Sheldon, 1998, Electroencephalographic findings during presyncope and syncope induced by tilt table testing, Can J Cardiol
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“NE spillover was below normal during tilt in both phenotypes.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [87] Vaddadi, 2011, Recurrent postural vasovagal syncope: sympathetic nervous system phenotypes, Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol source
The Abstract reports a subnormal norepinephrine spillover response during head-up tilt in both patient groups. The Figure 4 description says spillover was lower than in controls in both phenotypes, although the difference for the normal-blood-pressure group was not statistically significant (P=0.126). (LLM, conf=0.90)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Generally, attempts at validation have not been conducted with patients as rigorously defined as in the derivation studies.94,95”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [94] Romme, 2009, Diagnosing vasovagal syncope based on quantitative history-taking: validation of the Calgary Syncope Symptom Score, Eur Heart J source
- Partly supportedcites [95] Exposito, 2013, Usefulness of the Calgary Syncope Symptom Score for the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope in the elderly, Europace sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page not provided) says one validation study included patients with other causes of loss of consciousness, which it identifies as a methodological issue. It also contrasts this study’s elderly patients with the original score’s population without structural heart disease. These examples support the concern, but the paper does not establish that validation attempts generally used less rigorously defined patients. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“NE spillover in the low-pressure phenotype was associated with low tyrosine hydroxylase levels, which probably reduced NE synthesis.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [87] Vaddadi, 2011, Recurrent postural vasovagal syncope: sympathetic nervous system phenotypes, Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol source
The Cellular: SNPs section reports low tyrosine hydroxylase levels and low norepinephrine spillover in the low-blood-pressure phenotype, with reduced norepinephrine synthesis offered as the presumed explanation. The Conclusions likewise attribute subnormal spillover in that phenotype most likely to low levels of tyrosine hydroxylase. (LLM, conf=0.94)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Patients with recurrent postural vasovagal syncope might have sympathetic nervous system phenotypes.87”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [87] Vaddadi, 2011, Recurrent postural vasovagal syncope: sympathetic nervous system phenotypes, Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol source
The Conclusions state that patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope can be divided into two clinical groups based on supine blood pressure, with different mechanisms affecting norepinephrine availability. The Abstract explicitly says the groups show unique sympathetic nervous system abnormalities. (LLM, conf=0.94)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Two clinical studies have reported that isometric exercise of the large muscles induces a significant blood pressure increase during the phase of impending reflex syncope on tilt tests, enabling the patient to avoid or delay losing consciousness.118,119”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [118] Krediet, 2002, Management of vasovagal syncope: controlling or aborting faints by leg crossing and muscle tensing, Circulation source
- Supportedcites [119] Brignole, 2002, Isometric arm counter-pressure maneuvers to abort impending vasovagal syncope, J Am Coll Cardiol source
The Results report that handgrip during impending tilt-induced vasovagal syncope raised systolic blood pressure relative to control and reduced the proportion of patients who fainted. The Discussion states that arm contraction can abort syncope in some cases and delay it in others. This paper supports the claim as one of the two cited clinical studies. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Four randomized trials on midodrine have shown a consistent risk reduction of approximately 70%.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [125] Samniah, 2001, Efficacy and safety of midodrine hydrochloride in patients with refractory vasovagal syncope, Am J Cardiol source
- Partly supportedcites [126] Perez-Lugones, 2001, Usefulness of midodrine in patients with severely symptomatic neurocardiogenic syncope: a randomized control study, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report a 78% risk reduction in this randomized trial, broadly consistent with the claimed approximate 70%. This paper reports one trial; its Results and Present Study sections do not establish that four randomized trials found a consistent reduction. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [127] Ward, 1998, Midodrine: a role in the management of neurocardiogenic syncope, Heart sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Patients and methods section describes one randomized crossover trial, not four trials. The Results report fewer tilt-induced syncopal episodes with midodrine; the reported counts of 14 on placebo versus 6 on midodrine correspond to an approximately 57% reduction, not a consistent reduction of approximately 70% across trials. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [128] Qingyou, 2006, The efficacy of midodrine hydrochloride in the treatment of children with vasovagal syncope, J Pediatr source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In this 23-patient trial, there was only an insignificant trend to benefit from midodrine in the exposure arms limited to 3 months.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [124] Romme, 2011, Effectiveness of midodrine treatment in patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope not responding to non-pharmacological treatment (STAND-trial), Europace source
The Recurrences section reports fewer syncopal recurrences during midodrine than placebo treatment (48% vs. 65%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.22). The trial design specifies 3-month treatment periods, and Table 2 identifies 23 patients in the analysis. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, in a meta analysis of a prespecified, prestratified substudy of POST 1 and a large earlier observational study, there was evidence of benefit in patients older than 40 years.122”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [122] Sheldon, 2012, Age-dependent effect of beta-blockers in preventing vasovagal syncope, Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s Abstract and Combined Populations section describe a meta-analysis of POST and an earlier observational cohort, with a pooled estimate suggesting benefit in older patients. However, the analysis used an age cutoff of ≥42 years, not older than 40; the pooled 95% confidence interval also included no effect. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It is important to note that there have been randomized controlled trials of the devices’ clinical effectiveness, and the results consistently show that for older patients with unexplained syncope, recorders should be used earlier in the investigation rather than later.102–104”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [102] Farwell, 2006, The clinical impact of implantable loop recorders in patients with syncope, Eur Heart J source
- Partly supportedcites [103] Krahn, 2003, Cost implications of testing strategy in patients with syncope: randomized assessment of syncope trial, J Am Coll Cardiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Patients and Discussion sections describe a randomized comparison and report that using an implantable loop recorder as the primary monitoring strategy yielded more diagnoses than conventional testing in patients with unexplained syncope. But this paper reports one trial, not consistent results across multiple trials; it also advises trying an external loop recorder first when the patient can use one and cautions against generalizing its findings to all patients with syncope. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [104] Krahn, 1998, Final results from a pilot study with an implantable loop recorder to determine the etiology of syncope in patients with negative noninvasive and invasive testing, Am J Cardiol source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“These patients appear to benefit from permanent pacing.105–112”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [105] Krahn, 1995, The etiology of syncope in patients with negative tilt table and electrophysiological testing, Circulation source
- Partly supportedcites [106] Krahn, 1999, Use of an extended monitoring strategy in patients with problematic syncope. Reveal Investigators, Circulation sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Symptom-Rhythm Correlation section reports that 12 of 18 patients with bradycardia during recurrent symptoms received pacemakers. It does not report whether pacing reduced subsequent syncope or otherwise benefited those patients; the study evaluated prolonged monitoring, not pacing outcomes. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [107] Moya, 2001, International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE) Investigators. Mechanism of syncope in patients with isolated syncope and in patients with tilt-positive syncope, Circulation sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Clinical Events section (page unavailable) reports that 14 patients received permanent pacemakers based on loop-recorder findings. But the Clinical Implications section (page unavailable) says the efficacy of therapy in preventing further syncope remains to be proved; this study does not establish that those patients benefited from pacing. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [108] Moya, 2008, Reproducibility of electrocardiographic findings in patients with suspected reflex neurally-mediated syncope, Am J Cardiol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [109] Solano, 2004, Incidence, diagnostic yield and safety of the implantable loop-recorder to detect the mechanism of syncope in patients with and without structural heart disease, Eur Heart J source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] Brignole, 2006, International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE) 2 Group. Early application of an implantable loop recorder allows effective specific therapy in patients with recurrent suspected neurally mediated syncope, Eur Heart J source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [111] Brignole, 2012, Pacemaker therapy in patients with neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole: Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3): a randomized trial, Circulation source
- Partly supportedcites [112] Brignole, 2014, Benefit of pacemaker therapy in patients with presumed neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole is greater when tilt test is negative: an analysis from the third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3), Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract says permanent pacing reduced recurrent syncope in patients with documented asystole. However, the Discussion reports no observed benefit in the tilt-test-positive subgroup; the apparent benefit was greatest in tilt-test-negative patients. The unqualified reference to “these patients” therefore extends beyond the subgroup for which this analysis found benefit. (LLM, conf=0.84)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In a randomized, prospective parallel clinical trial, a physical counterpressure maneuver was superior to controls, with a relative risk reduction of 39%.120”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [120] van Dijk, 2006, PC-Trial Investigators. Effectiveness of physical counter pressure maneuvers in preventing vasovagal syncope: the Physical Counter pressure Manoeuvres Trial (PC-Trial), J Am Coll Cardiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods describe a prospective randomized trial, and the Results (Population section) report fewer syncopal recurrences with physical counterpressure maneuvers than with conventional therapy. However, that Results passage gives a relative risk reduction of 0.36 (36%), not the claimed 39%. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Cardiac pacing effectively prevents syncopal recurrences.112,139,140”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [112] Brignole, 2014, Benefit of pacemaker therapy in patients with presumed neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole is greater when tilt test is negative: an analysis from the third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3), Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page not specified in our copy) concludes that pacing is very effective in patients with a negative tilt test, but says syncope can frequently recur when the test is positive. The unqualified claim omits that distinction and overstates the effectiveness reported for the full study population. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Could not verifycites [139] Deharo, 2013, Syncope without prodromes in patients with normal heart and normal electrocardiogram: a distinct entity, J Am Coll Cardiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods and Results describe adenosine levels and diagnostic testing, not treatment or recurrence after pacing. The Discussion discusses a possible mechanism and an ongoing study, but does not establish that cardiac pacing prevents syncopal recurrences (searched: pacing, pacemaker, recurrence, and treatment). (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Supportedcites [140] Brignole, 2011, Syncope due to idiopathic paroxysmal atrioventricular block: long-term follow-up of a distinct form of atrioventricular block, J Am Coll Cardiol source
The Results report that 17 patients received permanent dual-chamber pacing and none had recurrent syncope during follow-up. The Discussion states that pacing was completely successful in preventing syncopal recurrences in these patients with idiopathic paroxysmal AV block (article pp. 167–173). (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Finally, a small, double-blind study reported that pacing improved symptoms in very young patients with frequent vasovagal syncope.142”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Treatment of Children with Vasovagal Syncope or POTS
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [142] McLeod, 1999, Cardiac pacing for severe childhood neurally mediated syncope with reflex anoxic seizures, Heart sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract describes a small blinded study of 12 children (median age 2.8 years) in which pacing significantly reduced syncope compared with sensing only. However, the children had frequent, severe neurally mediated syncope with reflex anoxic seizures; the paper does not describe the study population simply as having vasovagal syncope. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A small, single-blind randomized trial reported that permanent cardiac pacing greatly reduced syncope burden in young children, with frequent syncope associated with documented asystole.142”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [142] McLeod, 1999, Cardiac pacing for severe childhood neurally mediated syncope with reflex anoxic seizures, Heart sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports a study of 12 children with frequent attacks and recorded asystole; both pacing modes significantly reduced syncope compared with sensing only. However, the Methods describe allocation by chronological order of implantation, not randomization, and say the parent, patient, and doctor analyzing results were blinded—not a single-blind design. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Patients with an asystolic response during tilt testing fared no better than those with nonasystolic responses.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [112] Brignole, 2014, Benefit of pacemaker therapy in patients with presumed neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole is greater when tilt test is negative: an analysis from the third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3), Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol source
The Supplemental table W3 passage reports that patients with an asystolic tilt-test response had syncope recurrence rates similar to those with a nonasystolic positive response (p=0.53). This supports the comparison in the claim, with “fared no better” referring to syncope recurrence. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Two randomized clinical trials reported that midodrine improved either hemodynamic changes to orthostasis or clinical symptoms in patients with POTS.145,146”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Treatment of Children with Vasovagal Syncope or POTS
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [145] Ross, 2013, What is brain fog? An evaluation of the symptom in postural tachycardia syndrome, Clin Auton Res sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Pharmacological interventions; page unavailable) report that 45% of respondents who evaluated midodrine said it improved brain fog, a symptom in patients with POTS. The Methods (Study questionnaire; page unavailable) describe a patient survey, not a randomized clinical trial, and the paper does not report that midodrine improved hemodynamic responses to orthostasis. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Supportedcites [146] Chen, 2011, Midodrine hydrochloride is effective in the treatment of children with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, Circ J source
The Discussion identifies this as a randomized controlled study in children with POTS. The Abstract reports significantly better symptom scores and treatment outcomes with midodrine than with the comparison treatments. This source supports the clinical-symptoms part of the sentence; the sentence's other trial is cited separately. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These tests should not be performed routinely as there is no evidence that they improve the care or the process of care in the majority of patients.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Although a number of patients with POTS have been found to have herniation of their cerebellar tonsils (Chiari I), there is no association between cerebellar tonsil herniation and POTS.51”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [51] Garland, 2001, Chiari I malformation as a cause of orthostatic intolerance symptoms: a media myth?, Am J Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are no long-term, prospective, placebo-controlled clinical trials of any therapeutic intervention that have demonstrated a substantial improvement in outcomes”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 2: Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia Definition > Treatment
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Blood volume is reduced in up to 70% of patients with POTS.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Physiology
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“POTS is also common in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.17”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Epidemiology and Natural History
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [17] Lewis, 2013, Clinical characteristics of a novel subgroup of chronic fatigue syndrome patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, J Intern Med source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“IST is rarely associated with tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy.55,56”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 2: Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia Definition > Diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [55] Winum, 2009, A case of cardiomyopathy induced by inappropriate sinus tachycardia and cured by ivabradine, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [56] Romeo, 2011, A pediatric case of cardiomyopathy induced by inappropriate sinus tachycardia: efficacy of ivabradine, Pediatr Cardiol source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Rising to an upright position increases gravitational forces and leads to the pooling of 500 to 800 mL of blood in the venous system, in the pelvic and splanchnic circulation, and in the lower limbs.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Few treatments have been tested with the usual rigor of randomized clinical trials”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This outcome suggests that vasovagal syncope can have 2 distinct physiologic groups that can be clinically detected based on supine blood pressure.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tilt-table tests feature prolonged passive postural stress to determine whether patients have the autonomic substrate for vasovagal syncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A syncopal episode with suppression of both AV and sinus node activity is very likely the result of vasovagal syncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Ultimately, paradoxical vasodilation can occur, leading to further hypotension and loss of consciousness.77”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [77] Thomson, 1996, Failure of reflex venoconstriction during exercise in patients with vasovagal syncope, Circulation source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, there is no “ideal” protocol, given that there is an inexorable trade-off between sensitivity and specificity.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While unconscious, the patient is usually motionless.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The tilt test has not been prospectively validated with populations with rigorously defined vasovagal syncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, with increasingly aggressive protocols comes the likelihood of decreased specificity.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These studies challenge the hypothesis that abrupt sympathetic nerve activity withdrawal causes the vasovagal syncope response.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“- establishing a diagnosis of pseudosyncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Diagnostic accuracy is approximately 10%–25% after 1 month of monitoring.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“- differentiating convulsive syncope from true seizure activity”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A careful and focused medical history review will often determine the diagnosis, with no further investigation needed.89”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [89] van Dijk, 2008, High diagnostic yield and accuracy of history, physical examination, and ECG in patients with transient loss of consciousness in FAST: the Fainting Assessment study, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The use of high doses of isoproterenol during tilts exceeding 10 minutes at 80° head-up tilt is accompanied by reduced specificity.98”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [98] Natale, 1995, Provocation of hypotension during head-up tilt testing in subjects with no history of syncope or presyncope, Circulation source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, cardiac pacing has a very limited role in patients with typical vasovagal syncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Adequately designed and controlled randomized studies have found that beta-blockers are not effective for treating vasovagal syncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [91] Sheldon, 2006, Diagnostic criteria for vasovagal syncope based on a quantitative history, Eur Heart J source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [121] Madrid, 2001, Lack of efficacy of atenolol for the prevention of neurally mediated syncope in a highly symptomatic population: a prospective, double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study, J Am Coll Cardiol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, due to selection or design issues, none of the trials provided high-level evidence for adults.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The maneuvers do not work for patients with a minimal or absent prodrome.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There remains considerable uncertainty about the efficacy of serotonin transport inhibitors in preventing syncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Numerous observational studies have shown that ILRs can deliver diagnoses for approximately 35% of patients during the devices’ lifetime.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the apparently benign profile of vasovagal syncope, patients with frequent episodes occasionally need treatment.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Vasovagal syncope is generally benign, and its natural history can include clusters of syncope separated by long periods without recurrence.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The study populations of these trials were predominantly composed of patients in their 70s and 80s.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Atenolol was no more effective than placebo in preventing recurrent syncope in another double-blind randomized clinical trial.121”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [121] Madrid, 2001, Lack of efficacy of atenolol for the prevention of neurally mediated syncope in a highly symptomatic population: a prospective, double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study, J Am Coll Cardiol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The largest prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized critical trial of beta-blocker therapy was the POST I trial, which analyzed the use of metoprolol for patients with tilt-positive presumed vasovagal syncope.91”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [91] Sheldon, 2006, Diagnostic criteria for vasovagal syncope based on a quantitative history, Eur Heart J source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is ample evidence for the involvement of serotonin in the midbrain regulation of heart rate and blood pressure.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The likelihood of a patient fainting after specialist assessment can be predicted from the number of syncopes in the preceding year.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [91] Sheldon, 2006, Diagnostic criteria for vasovagal syncope based on a quantitative history, Eur Heart J source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Sumner, 2010, Prevention of Syncope Trial I. Recent history of vasovagal syncope in a young, referral-based population is a stronger predictor of recurrent syncope than lifetime syncope burden, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the studies on tilt-training were poorly controlled.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“A small pediatric trial showed that children who took placebo had a better long-term outcome with respect to presyncope and syncope than those who took fludrocortisone.123”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [123] Salim, 2005, Effectiveness of fludrocortisone and salt in preventing syncope recurrence in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, J Am Coll Cardiol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are no quantitative data on the outcome of pediatric patients with vasovagal syncope or POTS.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Treatment of Children with Vasovagal Syncope or POTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“In a small multicenter trial performed on 80 selected elderly patients with unexplained syncope, dual-chamber cardiac pacing significantly reduced 2-year syncopal recurrence from 69% in the control group to 23% in the active group.141”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [141] Flammang, 2012, Treatment of unexplained syncope: a multicenter, randomized trial of cardiac pacing guided by adenosine 5’-triphosphate testing, Circulation source
plaindirectn = 80- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A small randomized trial reported that midodrine was effective in preventing recurrent syncope.128”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Treatment of Children with Vasovagal Syncope or POTS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [128] Qingyou, 2006, The efficacy of midodrine hydrochloride in the treatment of children with vasovagal syncope, J Pediatr source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and placebo more effective than metoprolol in preventing syncope.147”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Treatment of Children with Vasovagal Syncope or POTS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [147] Zhang, 2008, Randomized comparison of metoprolol versus conventional treatment in preventing recurrence of vasovagal syncope in children and adolescents, Med Science Monitor
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By showing that patients with prolonged pauses during syncope but negative tilt test results benefit most from cardiac pacing, ISSUE-3 suggested that a positive tilt test result could be used to select patients who should not undergo permanent cardiac pacing.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“During clinical syncope, paroxysmal AV block occurs with 1 or multiple consecutive pauses but with no preceding or accompanying changes in sinus or AV node function.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To date, there are no effective therapies that have passed the scrutiny of even moderately sized, randomized clinical trials for any of these syndromes.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 5: Future Opportunities
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This outcome occurs without sinus node slowing or progressive atrioventricular conduction delay.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A 24-hour Holter monitor can be performed to distinguish POTS from IST.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Diagnosis of POTS and Vasovagal Syncope
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3; a randomized, double-blind trial), 511 patients aged 40 years and older with recurrent reflex syncope were given an ILR.111”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [111] Brignole, 2012, Pacemaker therapy in patients with neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole: Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3): a randomized trial, Circulation source
plainn = 511- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Two randomized studies of children with syncope found placebo more effective than fludrocortisone and salt in preventing syncope123”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Treatment of Children with Vasovagal Syncope or POTS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [123] Salim, 2005, Effectiveness of fludrocortisone and salt in preventing syncope recurrence in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, J Am Coll Cardiol source
plaindirectn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Most of these patients were randomly assigned to dual-chamber pacing with rate-drop response or to sensing only.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [111] Brignole, 2012, Pacemaker therapy in patients with neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole: Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3): a randomized trial, Circulation source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Only 17% of the patients had syncope with documented asystole, or ≥6 seconds of asystole without syncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [111] Brignole, 2012, Pacemaker therapy in patients with neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole: Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3): a randomized trial, Circulation source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are currently no positive placebo-controlled studies on pacemakers with patients younger than 40 years with vasovagal syncope; for these patients, cardiac pacing should be the last choice.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A syncope syndrome with low plasma adenosine levels has been described in patients with unexplained syncope, sudden onset and no prodrome, and a normal heart and normal ECG.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 86
- Probably not a substantial claim. 52
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, the devices have been shown to improve care in only the subset of patients who are older, have asystole documented on the ILR, and whose tilt test results were negative, probably because many of the diagnoses are of vasovagal syncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [105] Krahn, 1995, The etiology of syncope in patients with negative tilt table and electrophysiological testing, Circulation source
- Disputedcites [106] Krahn, 1999, Use of an extended monitoring strategy in patients with problematic syncope. Reveal Investigators, Circulation sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (page not provided) concludes that prolonged monitoring was effective and safe in patients with problematic syncope, not only in the specified subset. The Symptom-Rhythm Correlation section (page not provided) reports diagnoses leading to pacemakers and treatment for tachyarrhythmias, but does not establish an older, recorder-documented-asystole, negative-tilt subgroup as the only patients whose care improved. It reports seven clinical diagnoses of neurally mediated syncope, not that many diagnoses were vasovagal. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Partly supportedcites [107] Moya, 2001, International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE) Investigators. Mechanism of syncope in patients with isolated syncope and in patients with tilt-positive syncope, Circulation sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports ILR-documented asystole in both tilt-negative and tilt-positive patients, and Clinical Implications reports ILR-guided therapy in 16 patients. But the paper does not show that care improves only for older, tilt-negative patients; Clinical Implications explicitly says the efficacy of therapy in preventing further syncope remains to be proved. The Discussion also reports asystolic syncope in tilt-positive patients. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [108] Moya, 2008, Reproducibility of electrocardiographic findings in patients with suspected reflex neurally-mediated syncope, Am J Cardiol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [109] Solano, 2004, Incidence, diagnostic yield and safety of the implantable loop-recorder to detect the mechanism of syncope in patients with and without structural heart disease, Eur Heart J source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] Brignole, 2006, International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE) 2 Group. Early application of an implantable loop recorder allows effective specific therapy in patients with recurrent suspected neurally mediated syncope, Eur Heart J source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [111] Brignole, 2012, Pacemaker therapy in patients with neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole: Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3): a randomized trial, Circulation source
- Partly supportedcites [112] Brignole, 2014, Benefit of pacemaker therapy in patients with presumed neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole is greater when tilt test is negative: an analysis from the third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3), Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusions (page unavailable) report that cardiac pacing was very effective in patients with ILR-documented asystole and a negative tilt test. The claim instead assigns that benefit to the implantable loop recorder, which the Study protocol (page unavailable) used to document events before pacemaker treatment. The Conclusions say evidence for pacing in tilt-positive patients was insufficient, not that benefit is possible only in the tilt-negative group; they do not give vasovagal diagnoses as the reason for the difference. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“and more than 75% are female.7–9,11–14,16”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Epidemiology and Natural History
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [7] Thieben, 2007, Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: the Mayo clinic experience, Mayo Clin Proc source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [8] Schondorf, 1993, Idiopathic postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: an attenuated form of acute pandysautonomia?, Neurology source
- Not matchedcites [9] Low, 1995, Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), Neurology
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites [11] Singer, 2012, Postural tachycardia in children and adolescents: what is abnormal?, J Pediatr source
The paper’s introductory passage (labeled Abstract in our copy) says females predominate in POTS and orthostatic intolerance at a ratio of about 5:1. That corresponds to approximately 83% female, supporting the claim that more than 75% of POTS patients are female. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [12] Garland, 2007, The hemodynamic and neurohumoral phenotype of postural tachycardia syndrome, Neurology source
- Supportedcites [13] Low, 2009, Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol source
The Clinical Features section reports a consistent female-to-male ratio of 5:1 among patients evaluated, equivalent to about 83% female. The Abstract Results also states that females predominate by 5:1, supporting the claim that more than 75% are female. (LLM, conf=0.95)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [14] Robertson, 1999, The epidemic of orthostatic tachycardia and orthostatic intolerance, Am J Med Sci source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [16] Freeman, 2011, Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome, Clin Auton Res source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This abrupt reduction in venous return decreases cardiac output and blood pressure, which are rapidly sensed by the arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreceptors, thus triggering sympathetic noradrenergic vasoconstriction and venoconstriction accompanied by an increase in heart rate.73”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [73] Mosqueda-Garcia, 2000, The elusive pathophysiology of neurally mediated syncope, Circulation sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Pathophysiology section (page unavailable) says that standing reduces venous return, cardiac output, and blood pressure, and that arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreceptors detect these changes. The Ventricular Theory section describes a reflex increase in sympathetic activity, peripheral resistance, and heart rate when blood pressure falls. Our copy does not specify venoconstriction as part of that response or characterize the vasoconstriction as noradrenergic. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A number of mechanisms have been described in patients with POTS,18 including autonomic denervation, hypovolemia, hyperadrenergic stimulation, deconditioning, and hypervigilance”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [18] Benarroch, 2012, Postural tachycardia syndrome: a heterogeneous and multifactorial disorder, Mayo Clin Proc source
The Classic Pathophysiology and POTS Subtypes section describes peripheral sympathetic denervation. The Figure lists hypovolemia, deconditioning, and a hyperadrenergic state among POTS mechanisms, while the table in Conclusions and Perspective includes somatic hypervigilance. No page numbers are supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“low-dose propranolol (10–20 mg PO) acutely lowers standing heart rate and improves symptoms in patients with POTS, while higher doses of propranolol are less well tolerated.42”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [42] Raj, 2009, Propranolol decreases tachycardia and improves symptoms in the postural tachycardia syndrome: less is more, Circulation sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract’s Methods and Results report that oral propranolol 20 mg acutely lowered standing heart rate and improved symptoms in patients with POTS; symptom improvement was smaller with 80 mg. The Discussion’s Clinical Significance section says patients commonly receive and generally tolerate 10–20 mg, but the acute trial tested 20 mg, not 10 mg. The paper suggests higher doses may worsen symptoms rather than establishing that they are generally less well tolerated. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Ivabradine eliminated symptoms in 70% of patients and increased exercise performance.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 2: Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia Definition > Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [63] Cappato, 2012, Clinical efficacy of ivabradine in patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover evaluation, J oAm Coll Cardiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion and Conclusions (pp. 1327–1329) say ivabradine eliminated more than 70% of baseline symptoms, not all symptoms in 70% of patients. The Results (p. 1325) report complete symptom elimination in 9 of 21 patients, while exercise duration and capacity increased with ivabradine. Thus the exercise-performance finding is supported, but the claim confuses the percentage of symptoms eliminated with the percentage of patients whose symptoms were eliminated. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Treadmill exercise testing might be useful to document an exaggerated tachycardic response to exertion,59 although this assertion has not been validated.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 2: Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia Definition > Diagnosis
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [59] Morillo, 1994, Mechanism of ”inappropriate” sinus tachycardia. Role of sympathovagal balance, Circulation source
The Results report that exercise testing documented a markedly enhanced heart-rate response to low-grade exercise in four patients, supporting the cited suggestion that treadmill testing might help document such a response. The sentence’s qualification that this use has not been validated is consistent with the paper’s limited exercise-test observations. (LLM, conf=0.90)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The drug blunts orthostatic tachycardia and can improve chronic symptoms but is limited by adverse effects such as diarrhea, abdominal pain and cramps, nausea, and increased urinary urgency and frequency.45,46”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [45] Raj, 2005, Acetylcholinesterase inhibition improves tachycardia in postural tachycardia syndrome, Circulation sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Pyridostigmine Hemodynamics and Symptoms sections report reduced standing heart rate and improved symptom burden over four hours. Study Limitations says long-term efficacy and tolerability are unknown and identifies only increased gastrointestinal motility as a possible limiting side effect; it does not document sustained symptom improvement or the listed adverse effects. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [46] Kanjwal, 2011, Pyridostigmine in the treatment of postural orthostatic tachycardia: a single-center experience, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Deconditioned patients with POTS have reduced left ventricular mass, stroke volume, and blood volume,35 which improve with exercise training.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [35] Fu, 2010, Cardiac origins of the postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, J Am Coll Cardiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that patients with POTS had lower left ventricular mass and blood volume than sedentary controls, as well as smaller upright stroke volume. The Results report that exercise training increased left ventricular mass and blood volume, but do not establish that stroke volume also improved after training. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“For many years, vasovagal syncope was thought to be the result of loss of peripheral sympathetic activity, and the proposed pathophysiologic mechanism leading to vasovagal syncope was the blunting or cessation of MSNA.82–84”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [82] Morillo, 1997, Vagal and sympathetic mechanisms in patients with orthostatic vasovagal syncope, Circulation source
- Supportedcites [83] Mosqueda-Garcia, 1997, Sympathetic and baroreceptor reflex function in neurally mediated syncope evoked by tilt, J Clin Invest source
The Introduction (page not supplied) describes sympathetic withdrawal as a proposed explanation for vasodilation in neurally mediated syncope. It also reports an earlier observation in which muscle sympathetic nerve activity disappeared before a hypotensive attack, supporting the citing sentence’s description of the historical proposed mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [84] Jardine, 2002, Decrease in cardiac output and muscle sympathetic activity during vasovagal syncope, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The initial reduction in blood pressure during vasovagal syncope provoked by orthostatic stress is driven by a 50% decline in cardiac output, with coincident vasodilatation in only a subset of patients.78–80”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [78] Verheyden, 2008, Steep fall in cardiac output is main determinant of hypotension during drug-free and nitroglycerine-induced orthostatic vasovagal syncope, Heart Rhythm source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [79] Gisolf, 2004, Sublingual nitroglycerin used in routine tilt testing provokes a cardiac output-mediated vasovagal response, J Am Coll Cardiol source
- Partly supportedcites [80] Verheyden, 2007, Impact of age on the vasovagal response provoked by sublingual nitroglycerine in routine tilt testing, Clin Sci sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Vasovagal episode section reports a marked fall in cardiac output in all patients before tilt-back, and The final vasovagal response section describes the nitroglycerine-triggered response as cardiac-output-mediated. Our copy does not quantify that fall as roughly 50% or report coincident vasodilation in a subset; it says systemic vascular resistance did not fall before the response. The findings also concern nitroglycerine-provoked tilt testing, rather than orthostatic vasovagal syncope generally (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, the scores serve as useful reminders of important diagnostic points, and they form reproducible criteria for entry into observational, genetic, and randomized, controlled interventional trials.91,96,97”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [91] Sheldon, 2006, Diagnostic criteria for vasovagal syncope based on a quantitative history, Eur Heart J source
- Partly supportedcites [96] Alboni, 2001, Diagnostic value of history in patients with syncope with or without heart disease, J Am Coll Cardiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods describe predefined diagnostic criteria for syncope and strict adherence to them, including criteria for typical vasovagal syncope. The paper does not say that diagnostic scores serve as reminders or that scores provide entry criteria for observational, genetic, or randomized trials. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [97] Sud, 2009, Predicting the cause of syncope from clinical history in patients undergoing prolonged monitoring, Heart Rhythm source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Sympathetic vaso-constriction and baroreflex sensitivity prior to the onset of presyncope were well preserved, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) withdrawal occurred late after the onset of hypotension.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [81] Fu, 2014, Pathophysiology of neurally mediated syncope: Role of cardiac output and total peripheral resistance, Auton Neurosci sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section “Role of sympathetic activity and total peripheral resistance in syncope” says sympathetic withdrawal occurs at presyncope, well after the initial blood-pressure decrease. It does not establish that baroreflex sensitivity was preserved, and it reports that total peripheral resistance fell before the obvious MSNA reduction in most presyncopal individuals, rather than establishing preserved vasoconstriction generally. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“MSNA was normal in the normal blood pressure phenotype and increased in the low blood pressure phenotype group.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [87] Vaddadi, 2011, Recurrent postural vasovagal syncope: sympathetic nervous system phenotypes, Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol source
The Abstract reports that the sympathetic nerve-firing response during head-up tilt was normal in the normal-blood-pressure phenotype and accentuated in the low-blood-pressure phenotype. The discussion likewise says MSNA increased normally in the former group and at twice the normal rate in the latter; the finding concerns the response to tilt. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Both phenotypes have reduced NE availability, which ultimately impairs the neurocirculatory response to orthostatic stress.87”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [87] Vaddadi, 2011, Recurrent postural vasovagal syncope: sympathetic nervous system phenotypes, Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol source
The Conclusions state that both recurrent vasovagal syncope phenotypes have lowered norepinephrine availability, impairing the neural circulatory response. The Cellular: SNPs section also reports a failure of the normal response to orthostatic stress in both phenotypes. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Fu and Levine81 reported a moderate decline in cardiac output with coincident vasodilation in the majority of participants with presyncope and no changes in total peripheral resistance during presyncope in a minority of participants.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [81] Fu, 2014, Pathophysiology of neurally mediated syncope: Role of cardiac output and total peripheral resistance, Auton Neurosci source
The Introduction reports a moderate fall in cardiac output with coincident vasodilatation in 64% of presyncopal individuals. It reports no change in total peripheral resistance at presyncope in the smaller 36% subset, whose cardiac-output fall was severe and predominantly driven by reduced heart rate. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In some patients, however, decreased preload does not play a dominant role in causing symptoms; instead, peripheral vasodilation plays an important role.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [81] Fu, 2014, Pathophysiology of neurally mediated syncope: Role of cardiac output and total peripheral resistance, Auton Neurosci sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction reports that most presyncopal individuals had a moderate fall in cardiac output with coincident vasodilation, supporting an important role for vasodilation in some cases. The Contribution of cardiac output to syncope section also links reduced venous return to falling stroke volume; it does not establish that decreased preload is not the dominant cause of symptoms in those individuals. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Based on this evidence, there have been several observational studies and 3 small, randomized trials on serotonin transport inhibitors for the prevention of vasovagal syncope.130–132”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [130] Theodorakis, 2006, Fluoxetine vs. propranolol in the treatment of vasovagal syncope: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study, Europace source
This paper is one of the small randomized trials identified by the grouped citations. Its Study population section reports 96 patients randomized among fluoxetine, propranolol, and placebo, and its Discussion describes it as a prospective, placebo-controlled study of treatment for vasovagal syncope. The citation identifies a trial; it need not independently establish the total of three trials. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Partly supportedcites [131] Takata, 2002, Serotonin reuptake inhibitor (Paxil) does not prevent the vasovagal reaction associated with carotid sinus massage and/or lower body negative pressure in healthy volunteers, Circulation sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Subjects’ Characteristics and Lower Body Negative Pressure sections describe a small randomized Paxil-versus-placebo trial. But the Present Study section says it tested provoked presyncope in healthy volunteers, not prevention of vasovagal syncope in patients; it also says the effect in patients with a history of syncope remains unknown. As one of three citations, this paper establishes the existence of this trial, not the total count. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Supportedcites [132] Di Girolamo, 1999, Effects of paroxetine hydrochloride, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, on refractory vasovagal syncope: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, J Am Coll Cardiol source
The Study protocol describes a small randomized, blinded trial of paroxetine versus placebo in 68 patients, making this paper one of the trials the citation identifies. The Discussion also describes earlier serotonin-reuptake-inhibitor studies that were not placebo-controlled. This paper does not itself establish the total of three randomized trials, but the citation identifies it as one of them. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Although earlier observational, open-label, and single-blind studies have been uniformly positive, the results of 2 subsequent double-blind studies in adults were negative.133–138”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [133] Connolly, 1999, The North American Vasovagal Pacemaker Study (VPS). A randomized trial of permanent cardiac pacing for the prevention of vasovagal syncope, J Am Coll Cardiol source
- Partly supportedcites [134] Sutton, 2000, Dual-chamber pacing in the treatment of neurally mediated tilt-positive cardioinhibitory syncope: pacemaker versus no therapy: a multicenter randomized study. The Vasovagal Syncope International Study (VASIS) Investigators, Circulation sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Comparison With the North American Vasovagal Pacemaker Study section says this study and an earlier randomized study found favorable results, and that neither was blinded. The Study Limitations section also confirms that this trial was unblinded. Our copy does not establish that observational and single-blind studies were uniformly positive or report the two subsequent negative double-blind studies. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [135] Ammirati, 2001, Permanent cardiac pacing versus medical treatment for the prevention of recurrent vasovagal syncope: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, Circulation sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page not provided) reports a favorable pacing result and describes earlier studies as suggesting benefit. The Study Limitations (page not provided) state that this trial was not blinded. Our copy does not report two subsequent negative double-blind studies, so it supports only the earlier-positive part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [136] Connolly, 2003, Pacemaker therapy for prevention of syncope in patients with recurrent severe vasovagal syncope: Second Vasovagal Pacemaker Study (VPS II): a randomized trial, JAMA source
- Partly supportedcites [137] Raviele, 2004, Vasovagal Syncope and Pacing Trial Investigators. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of permanent cardiac pacing for the treatment of recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. The vasovagal syncope and pacing trial (SYNPACE), Eur Heart J sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Comparison with previous studies section reports positive results for dual-chamber observational studies and three randomized open studies, and says that VPS II and SYNPACE did not confirm pacing efficacy. It also says observational studies found single-chamber VVI pacing ineffective, so the earlier studies were not uniformly positive; the passage does not establish the claim about single-blind studies. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [138] Sud, 2007, Implications of mechanism of bradycardia on response to pacing in patients with unexplained syncope, Europace sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says two randomized controlled trials failed to show that pacing was superior to sham pacing in patients with positive tilt tests, supporting the negative-trial portion. It mentions earlier pacing studies but does not say that the observational, open-label, and single-blind studies were uniformly positive. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, syncope recurred in a substantial minority of patients, and the study was open label.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [120] van Dijk, 2006, PC-Trial Investigators. Effectiveness of physical counter pressure maneuvers in preventing vasovagal syncope: the Physical Counter pressure Manoeuvres Trial (PC-Trial), J Am Coll Cardiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Population section reports syncope recurrence in 31 of 98 patients (31.6%) in the maneuver group and 56 of 110 (50.9%) in the conventional-treatment group, supporting ‘a substantial minority.’ The Study limitations section says patients were blinded to the randomization outcome, while physicians were not; describing the study without qualification as open label overlooks that patient blinding. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“While results have generally been positive in uncontrolled trials and short-term controlled trials, those of long-term, placebo-controlled prospective trials have been less encouraging.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [113] Sutton, 2012, Key challenges in the current management of syncope, Nat Rev Cardiol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [114] Kuriachan, 2008, Evidence-based treatment for vasovagal syncope, Heart Rhythm source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [115] Vyas, 2013, Are treatments for vasovagal syncope effective? A meta-analysis, Int J Cardiol source
- Could not verifycites [116] Brignole, 2003, Management of syncope referred urgently to general hospitals with and without syncope units, Europace sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Findings and Discussion compare diagnostic management in hospitals with and without syncope units; the Conclusions discuss the need for further studies of those units. Searches for long-term placebo-controlled trials and for lifestyle or medical therapies found no passage comparing treatment-trial outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.77)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [117] Sutton, 2013, Treatment of reflex syncope, J Med Diagn Meth source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Typically, the vasovagal reflex is both hypotensive and cardioinhibitory, and there is emerging evidence that tilt-table testing identifies patients with predominant reflex hypotension.112”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [112] Brignole, 2014, Benefit of pacemaker therapy in patients with presumed neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole is greater when tilt test is negative: an analysis from the third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3), Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says hypotension plays a major role in tilt-induced neurally mediated syncope and usually precedes bradycardia, including in cardioinhibitory cases. It also infers from the study’s findings that a vasodepressive mechanism dominates in tilt-positive patients, supporting the claim’s qualified description of emerging evidence. (LLM, conf=0.89)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A recent subanalysis of ISSUE-3 showed that the syncope recurrence rate for patients with asystole, with or without syncope, was 5% for patients with negative tilt test results and 55% for those with positive tilt test results, which is similar to the results observed in controls without pacing.112”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [112] Brignole, 2014, Benefit of pacemaker therapy in patients with presumed neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole is greater when tilt test is negative: an analysis from the third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3), Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report 21-month syncope recurrence estimates of 5% after a negative tilt test and 55% after a positive tilt test among patients with ILR-documented asystole who received pacemakers. They also say the positive-tilt rate was similar to that in untreated controls. The passages do not establish the claim’s additional qualifier that the documented asystole occurred “with or without syncope.” (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The 10-minute standing tests for POTS provided reasonable accuracy in a small study on adults, but these tests have not been validated for pediatric populations.143”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Diagnosis of POTS and Vasovagal Syncope
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [143] Plash, 2013, Diagnosing postural tachycardia syndrome: comparison of tilt testing compared with standing haemodynamics, Clin Sci source
The Results report 87% sensitivity and 67% specificity for the 10-minute stand test, and the Discussion calls it the most accurate test. The Methods describe a small sample of adults, while the Discussion says the findings cannot be extrapolated to children because all subjects were over 18. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The diagnostic standard for tilt-table testing for POTS in young people requires symptoms of orthostatic intolerance and an orthostatic increase in heart rate of at least 40 bpm, which is greater than in adults.11”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Diagnosis of POTS and Vasovagal Syncope
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [11] Singer, 2012, Postural tachycardia in children and adolescents: what is abnormal?, J Pediatr sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion’s “Pediatric OI” criteria require orthostatic symptoms and a heart-rate increase of at least 40 bpm within five minutes of head-up tilt; the Discussion also identifies the adult threshold as 30 bpm. But its “Pediatric POTS” criteria additionally require an absolute orthostatic heart rate of at least 130 bpm for ages 13 and younger or 120 bpm for ages 14 and older. The citing sentence omits that additional POTS requirement. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.89)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“These patients were refractory to multiple medications and appeared to benefit from cardiac pacing.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [142] McLeod, 1999, Cardiac pacing for severe childhood neurally mediated syncope with reflex anoxic seizures, Heart sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Recorded Events section reports fewer syncopal episodes during pacing, supporting the apparent benefit. The Conclusions recommend pacing when medical treatment has failed or been declined, but the paper does not establish that these patients were refractory to multiple medications. (LLM, conf=0.86)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“Most patients present with POTS between the ages of 15 and 25 years,7”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Epidemiology and Natural History
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [7] Thieben, 2007, Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: the Mayo clinic experience, Mayo Clin Proc source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The final minimum consensus was 76% and the mean was 94%.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As much as possible, we made recommendations based on published evidence.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Introduction
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The symptoms associated with POTS are those that occur with standing, such as lightheadedness and palpitations; not associated with particular postures, such as bloating, nausea, diarrhea, and abdominal pain; and systemic, such as fatigue, sleep disturbance, and migraine headaches.7”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [7] Thieben, 2007, Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: the Mayo clinic experience, Mayo Clin Proc source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The recommendations and definitions in this document are based on the consensus of the full writing group following the Heart Rhythm Society’s process for establishing consensus-based guidance for clinical care.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The prevalence of POTS is approximately 0.2%, with little variance among 4 published reports.9,12,14,15”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Epidemiology and Natural History
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Low, 1995, Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), Neurology
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [12] Garland, 2007, The hemodynamic and neurohumoral phenotype of postural tachycardia syndrome, Neurology source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [14] Robertson, 1999, The epidemic of orthostatic tachycardia and orthostatic intolerance, Am J Med Sci source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [15] Schondorf, 1999, Orthostatic intolerance in the chronic fatigue syndrome, J Auton Nerv Syst source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All members of the writing group and peer reviewers provided disclosure statements of all relationships that might present real or perceived conflicts of interest, as shown in the Appendices.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“POTS is a systemic illness, with postural tachycardia one of several criteria.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To identify consensus, we conducted surveys of the entire writing group, using a predefined threshold for agreement as a vote of >75% on each recommendation.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Patients with POTS and patients with IST can present similar symptoms, but IST is induced by both physiologic and emotional stresses, while POTS is generally induced only by orthostatic stress.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 2: Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia Definition > Diagnosis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The median age of the first syncope is approximately 14 years, and most people with vasovagal syncope will have had their first syncope before age 40.67”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Epidemiology and Natural History
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [67] Sheldon, 2006, Investigators of the Syncope Symptom Study and the Prevention of Syncope Trial. Age of first faint in patients with vasovagal syncope, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The estimate for emergency departments is obscured by the fact that approximately 35% of patients with syncope remain undiagnosed.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Epidemiology and Natural History
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a tilt-table test might be helpful because it can provide vital signs over more prolonged periods than a simple stand test.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Diagnosis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, primary success rates are reasonably good, but there is a high rate of symptom recurrence, and the complication rates are significant.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 2: Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia Definition > Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The treatment of POTS is difficult; there are no therapies that are uniformly successful, and combinations of approaches are often needed.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The overall 1-year recurrence rate in many reports is approximately 25%–35%, and this rate can be predicted by the number of syncopes in the year prior to assessment.68”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Epidemiology and Natural History
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Sumner, 2010, Prevention of Syncope Trial I. Recent history of vasovagal syncope in a young, referral-based population is a stronger predictor of recurrent syncope than lifetime syncope burden, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These patients are hypersensitive to isoproterenol and have marked tachycardic responses to dosages that do not induce hemodynamic changes in healthy individuals.33”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [33] Abe, 2000, Heart rate and plasma cyclic AMP responses to isoproterenol infusion and effect of beta-adrenergic blockade in patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, J Cardiovasc Pharmacol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Radiofrequency sinus node modification for the sinus tachycardia of POTS is not recommended, because it often worsens symptoms and occasionally results in the patient requiring a pacemaker.50”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [50] Shen, 2001, Is sinus node modification appropriate for inappropriate sinus tachycardia with features of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome?, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Expert centers report anecdotally that 1 L of normal saline infused over 1 hour decreases orthostatic tachycardia and improves symptoms for several hours to 2 days.40,41”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [40] Jacob, 1997, Effects of volume loading and pressor agents in idiopathic orthostatic tachycardia, Circulation source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [41] Gordon, 2000, Hemodynamic and symptomatic effects of acute interventions on tilt in patients with postural tachycardia syndrome, Clin Auton Res source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Approximately 30%–50% of patients with syncope, however, are diagnosed with an autonomically mediated form of syncope, and most of these are vasovagal.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Epidemiology and Natural History
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These complications include requirements for permanent pacing, transient or permanent phrenic nerve paralysis, and transient superior vena cava syndrome.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 2: Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia Definition > Treatment
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This manifestation, which occurs in up to 50% of patients, is associated with systolic blood pressure increases of ≥10 mm Hg while standing upright for 10 minutes and plasma norepinephrine levels ≥600 pg/mL while standing.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Physiology
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Detailed physiologic and psychometric studies showed that although anxiety is commonly present in POTS, the heart rate response to orthostatic stress is not caused by anxiety but is instead a response to an underlying physiologic abnormality.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [36] Masuki, 2007, Excessive heart rate response to orthostatic stress in postural tachycardia syndrome is not caused by anxiety, J Appl Physiol source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Midodrine significantly reduces orthostatic tachycardia but to a lesser degree than intravenous saline.40”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [40] Jacob, 1997, Effects of volume loading and pressor agents in idiopathic orthostatic tachycardia, Circulation source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“there are several underlying diseases that can result in this syndrome, including increased sinus node automaticity, beta-adrenergic hypersensitivity, decreased parasympathetic activity, and impaired neurohumoral modulation.54”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 2: Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [54] Chiale, 2006, Inappropriate sinus tachycardia may be related to an immunologic disorder involving cardiac beta adrenergic receptors, Heart Rhythm source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“by age 60, 42% of women and 32% of men will have had at least 1 vasovagal syncope, which is their cumulative incidence.65,66”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Epidemiology and Natural History
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [65] Ganzeboom, 2006, Lifetime cumulative incidence of syncope in the general population: a study of 549 Dutch subjects aged 35–60 years, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [66] Serletis, 2006, Vasovagal syncope in medical students and their first-degree relatives, Eur Heart J source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Fludrocortisone might be useful for boosting sodium retention and expanding the plasma volume, although these pharmacodynamic effects might last only 1–2 days, and its effectiveness has not been tested in randomized clinical trials.39”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 1: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Definition > Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [39] Rowe, 2001, Fludrocortisone acetate to treat neurally mediated hypotension in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial, JAMA source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The current gold standard for diagnosing syncope due to cardiac arrhythmias is recording an ECG during an episode of clinical syncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The vasovagal response always includes hypotension and often includes bradycardia with, at times, prolonged asystole in the sinus and AV nodes.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are 4 categories of key diagnostic features: predisposing situations, prodromal symptoms, physical signs, and recovery time and symptoms.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“However, 2 groups have recently reported persistence of MSNA during vasovagal syncope, bringing into question the role of sympathetic activity withdrawal as the final physiologic event that precipitates loss of consciousness.85,86”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [85] Cooke, 2002, Association between vasovagal hypotension and low sympathetic neural activity during presyncope, Clin Auton Res source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [86] Vaddadi, 2010, Persistence of muscle sympathetic nerve activity during vasovagal syncope, Eur Heart J source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the importance of tilt testing in the investigation of patients with syncope of cardiogenic etiology is diminishing, the test continues to be helpful in clinics devoted to the care of patients with cardiovascular autonomic disorders such as autonomic neuropathy, neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope, and POTS.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, fine and coarse myoclonic movements have been observed in approximately 10% of cases (even by untrained individuals), which can result in the condition being erroneously diagnosed as epilepsy.88”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [88] Sheldon, 2013, How to differentiate syncope from seizure, Card Electrophysiol Clin source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The diagnosis of vasovagal syncope is based on the clinical history, and there are abundant observational and quantitative data in this area.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Furthermore, the supplemental role of tilt testing when added to medical histories reviews by experts, with or without quantitative diagnostic scores, has not been assessed, and its indications are a matter of expert consensus.101”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [101] Blanc, 2013, Clinical laboratory testing: what is the role of tilt-table testing, active standing test, carotid massage, electrophysiological testing and ATP test in the syncope evaluation?, Prog Cardiovasc Dis source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“- situations in which, despite careful questioning, the cause of syncope remains unclear”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The yield depends on the duration of monitoring and is significantly greater with implanted monitors.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Patients often feel very tired for minutes to hours after the episode.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ruling out cardiac syncope is of less importance, however, for clinics specializing in providing assessment and care of patients with autonomic disorders.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tilt testing, when positive, suggests a tendency or predisposition to vasovagal syncope and does not establish it as the cause of the patient’s syncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ILRs store ECG evidence when activated by the patient after a syncope episode and after automatic detection based on rate or rhythm criteria.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When patient populations with strong presumptive evidence (ie, a high pretest probability) for vasovagal syncope are studied, the sensitivity approaches 78%-92%, and the currently recommended protocols have specificities of approximately 90% compared with the response of asymptomatic patients.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The vasovagal reflex is often triggered by adjunctive agents such as isoproterenol, nitrates, and clomipramine.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In most cardiology settings, it is important to determine whether the patients’ syncope is caused by arrhythmia.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The usefulness of investigation strategies depends on the patient mix and the purpose of the investigation.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prodromal features include progressive presyncope, diaphoresis, a sense of warmth, flushing, nausea, abdominal discomfort, visual blurring, and vision loss.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, a syncopal episode associated with a normal sinus rhythm can be due to several disorders such as orthostatic hypotension, vasovagal and carotid sinus reflexes, and even pseudosyncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Depending on the method, most patients with probable vasovagal syncope develop presyncope or syncope, while most control patients do not.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The age differences among these reports suggest that a failure of venous return could be the main factor in older patients, while younger patients might also have active vasodilation.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Physiology
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A positive response is defined as clinically reminiscent presyncope or syncope associated with hypotension and usually bradycardia.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pseudosyncope is a poorly reported syndrome of apparent syncopal episodes in the absence of cerebral hypoperfusion or hemodynamic changes that might cause cerebral hypoperfusion.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although these scores report overall high degrees of accuracy, they likely require revision and validation in larger populations.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
““Prolonged” can mean as little as 2–3 minutes, and the time period is a key feature distinguishing vasovagal syncope from initial orthostatic hypotension.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“External monitors have a loop memory that continuously records and deletes the ECGs, storing them when activated.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The devices are implanted subcutaneously under local anesthesia and last up to 3 years.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unconsciousness usually lasts less than 1–2 minutes, but full recovery can be sluggish.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The tilt test can prove useful for elderly patients due to the difficulties in obtaining an informative history in some older patients and due to its usefulness in identifying the cause of unexplained falls. 99,100”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] Del Rosso, 2008, Clinical predictors of cardiac syncope at initial evaluation in patients referred urgently to a general hospital: the EGSYS score, Heart source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [100] Rafanelli, 2014, Clinical aspects and diagnostic relevance of neuroautonomic evaluation in patients with unexplained falls, Aging Clin Exp Res source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fainting usually occurs after prolonged standing or sitting but can be triggered even in the supine position by exposure to medical or dental situations, pain, and scenes of injury.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The trials studied children, used tilt test outcomes as the main measure, studied extraordinarily symptomatic patients, or were open label.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tilt training has 2 forms. In the first, patients start training using repetitive tilt tests under monitored conditions. In the second, patients simply practice standing quietly at home for prolonged periods of time.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the Prevention of Syncope Trial (POST) study,91 patients with no syncope in the previous year had a 7% likelihood of fainting in the next year, while those with at least 1 syncope had a 40% likelihood of fainting.68”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Sumner, 2010, Prevention of Syncope Trial I. Recent history of vasovagal syncope in a young, referral-based population is a stronger predictor of recurrent syncope than lifetime syncope burden, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The POST 2 trial compared fludrocortisone to placebo in patients with recurrent, apparent, vasovagal syncope and showed only a strong trend to treatment benefit.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This treatment is hampered by poor patient compliance when conducting the program for an extended period of time and by an as yet undetermined biologic mechanism.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Younger and older individuals differ markedly, with the latter group more likely to have complicating comorbidities and medical therapies than the former group.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compared with conventional approaches, external ECG monitors provide more and earlier diagnoses and are cost effective.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Diagnosis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The major limitations of midodrine are the need for frequent dosing, its effects on supine hypertension, and a lack of knowledge of its teratogenic effects.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While the former might be beneficial, the latter is not.114”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [114] Kuriachan, 2008, Evidence-based treatment for vasovagal syncope, Heart Rhythm source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The trial has not undergone peer review and has not been published.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, only the most motivated patients will commit to medical therapy to prevent a handful of yearly syncopal episodes.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Conservative and Medical Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Patients with unexplained syncope have low plasma adenosine levels, and exogenous injections with adenosine triphosphate or adenosine can cause transient complete heart block in these patients more often than in control patients.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, this apparently beneficial response is also seen ubiquitously in single-blind adult trials, a response that is not reproduced in properly conducted double-blind trials.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, no comparisons between conventional single-chamber and dual-chamber pacing have been conducted.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Although the documentation of a prolonged asystolic reflex during tilt-table testing predicts a similar response during spontaneous syncope, the benefit of pacing for patients with tilt-positive cardioinhibitory syncope remains unproven.111”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [111] Brignole, 2012, Pacemaker therapy in patients with neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole: Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3): a randomized trial, Circulation source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Symptoms resulting from vasovagal syncope are usually more clearly articulated in young patients than in much older adults, and establishing the diagnosis is usually straightforward.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Diagnosis of POTS and Vasovagal Syncope
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is relatively little known about the natural history of these 3 syndromes, although it is widely suspected that they are chronic disorders with waxing and waning severity.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 5: Future Opportunities
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given that the medical history usually provides a clear diagnosis and that tilt testing has imperfect sensitivity and specificity in pediatric patients, such testing is usually not indicated.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Diagnosis of POTS and Vasovagal Syncope
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is little evidence that any treatment helps children with vasovagal syncope or POTS, and physicians rely on insights from adult medical literature.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Treatment of Children with Vasovagal Syncope or POTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Syncope during exercise usually raises concern about a rare cardiac electrical or structural cause, but the most common cause of exercise-related syncope in pediatric populations is still vasovagal syncope.144”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Diagnosis of POTS and Vasovagal Syncope
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [144] Colivicchi, 2002, Exercise-related syncope in young competitive athletes without evidence of structural heart disease. Clinical presentation and long-term outcome, Eur Heart J source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We lack portable, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitors, and these could easily be integrated into current and cutting-edge technologies.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 5: Future Opportunities
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dual-chamber pacing was used in almost all the above-mentioned trials, with a rate-drop response feature in the pacemaker that instituted rapid dual-chamber pacing if the device detected a rapid decrease in heart rate.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This syncope is not thought to be due to the vasovagal reflex but is included because the population with this type of syncope shares clinical features with those who have vasovagal syncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Accordingly, tilt-table testing can be performed to assess hypotensive susceptibility and identify patients who might not respond to permanent cardiac pacing.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pseudosyncope should be suspected when patients present with very frequent (at least daily) or prolonged syncope, with similar symptoms to vasovagal syncope.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Diagnosis of POTS and Vasovagal Syncope
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is still a large gap in our understanding of the causes of the physiologic disturbances underlying these syndromes.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 5: Future Opportunities
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly and despite professional guidelines, there is little evidence on the optimum strategy for assessing patients who might have these disorders.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 5: Future Opportunities
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This fact dulls enthusiasm for specific medical treatment of young people, particularly the use of pacemakers.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Treatment of Children with Vasovagal Syncope or POTS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Many young patients with vasovagal syncope or POTS stop fainting in late adolescence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“None of the syndromes have investigative approaches that make much use of recent advances in information technology in medical care.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 5: Future Opportunities
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many of these patients also have an earlier history of bona fide vasovagal syncope, and untangling the medical history requires particular care.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Diagnosis of POTS and Vasovagal Syncope
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the cornerstone for the diagnosis of pediatric POTS is the medical history, an orthostatic test is required to confirm the diagnosis.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Diagnosis of POTS and Vasovagal Syncope
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The relatively limited pediatric literature on this topic has meant that most insights and treatments for POTS and vasovagal syncope have come from the adult medical literature.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“During follow-up, the 2-year estimated syncope recurrence rate was 57% with the pacemaker off and 25% with the pacemaker on, with a relative risk reduction of 57%.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [111] Brignole, 2012, Pacemaker therapy in patients with neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole: Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3): a randomized trial, Circulation source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An ECG is a simple and well-tolerated test to screen for relatively uncommon but dangerous causes of syncope, including myocarditis, inheritable cardiomyopa-thies, long QT, and other inherited or acquired causes of arrhythmia.”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Diagnosis of POTS and Vasovagal Syncope
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
In many patients with vasovagal syncope, reduced preload by itself can lower cerebral perfusion enough to cause presyncope or syncope.
“In many patients, the hypotension due to decreased preload alone can reduce cerebral perfusion sufficiently to induce presyncope or syncope.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Vasovagal syncope is generally benign, and its natural history can include clusters of syncope separated by long periods without recurrence.
“Vasovagal syncope is generally benign, with a natural history that can include clusters of syncopes interspersed with long quiescent periods without recurrences.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Physical counterpressure maneuvers carry no risk.
“Nonetheless, these maneuvers are risk-free and should constitute a core management strategy for patients with vasovagal syncope of all severities.120”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many young patients with vasovagal syncope or POTS stop fainting in late adolescence.
“The number of syncopal episodes varies widely, and many young patients appear to stop fainting in late adolescence.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Direct a1-adrenoreceptor agonist.”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: clinical presentation, aetiology and management (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Inappropriate sinus tachycardia requires a consistent resting heart rate of at least 100 beats/min or a 24-hour mean heart rate above 90 beats/min.”
From Diagnosis and management of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The consensus statements consistently require orthostatic tachycardia and symptomatic orthostatic intolerance to be chronic problems that coexist.”
From Diagnosis and management of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Both the Heart Rhythm Society7 and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society5 currently recommend against this approach, and any other procedural treatment for POTS, based on a lack of evidence for benefit and potential risks of serious harm.”
From Diagnosis and management of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The HRS consensus document has no recommendation for beta-blocker treatment with or without ivabradine and ivabradine is given a class IIa recommendation.”
From Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Ablation is not recommended (Class III). 3”
From Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Treatments that improve symptoms of POTS might decrease the occurrence of syncope, although this is unknown (24,514–523).”
From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [24]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Although syncope occurs in patients with POTS, it is relatively infrequent, and there is little evidence that the syncope is due to POTS (24,514).”
From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [24]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“One condition of note is POTS, in which upright posture results in an apparently inappropriate tachycardia, usually with heart rates >120 bpm (24).”
From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [24]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“in patients under 20 years of age, the HR increment with upright posture should exceed 40 beats/min in order to be considered clinically significant (1,3).”
From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A regular, structured, and progressive exercise program is a Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Class IIa recommendation for the treatment of POTS, and it may receive enhanced recommendation based on recent data and lack of other proven effective therapies (1).”
From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia have distressing symptoms and no obvious underlying cause.7”
From Diagnosis and management of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Participant eligibility included a confirmed diagnosis of POTS in accordance with POTS consensus statement criteria.13”
From A Randomized Crossover Trial of Ivabradine, Propranolol, and Placebo in Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2026) · cites this paper as [13]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“based on a lack of evidence for benefit and potential risks of serious harm.”
From Diagnosis and management of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The HRS consensus document has no recommendation for beta-blocker treatment with or without ivabradine and ivabradine is given a class IIa recommendation.”
From Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“An upright plasma NE ≥600 pg/mL is the criterion most often used to define hyperadrenergic POTS,4–6 and this threshold has been adapted in recent expert consensus statements.7,8”
From Hyperadrenergic Postural Tachycardia Syndrome: Clinical Biomarkers and Response to Guanfacine (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Although syncope occurs in patients with POTS, it is relatively infrequent, and there is little evidence that the syncope is due to POTS (24,514).”
From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [24]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“with a prevalence of 0.2% (1)”
From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Pre-syncope is much more common than syncope in POTS, but it is not infrequent that POTS coexists with episodes of neurally mediated (reflex) syncope (1).”
From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“A typical patient with POTS is a 12 to 50 years old female (F:M ratio > 4:1) (Arnold et al., 2018; Sheldon et al., 2015).”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): State of the science and clinical care from a 2019 National Institutes of Health Expert Consensus Meeting - Part 1 (2021) · cites this paper as Sheldon et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“Estimates, based largely on clinical experience, range from 0.2% and 1% of the US population, which would suggest approximately 1–3 million affected persons (Arnold et al., 2018; Low et al., 2009; Sheldon et al., 2015).”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): State of the science and clinical care from a 2019 National Institutes of Health Expert Consensus Meeting - Part 1 (2021) · cites this paper as Sheldon et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“Along with increased water and salt intake, a progressive exercise program with recumbent aerobic exercise and leg resistance training transitioning to upright exercise has been shown to improve quality of life and reduce orthostatic HR in many patients (Fu and Levine, 2018, 2015; George et al., 2016; Sheldon et al., 2015; Shibata et al., 2012).”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): State of the science and clinical care from a 2019 National Institutes of Health Expert Consensus Meeting - Part 1 (2021) · cites this paper as Sheldon et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“Absolute hypovolemia is commonly observed in POTS, with up to 70% of patients exhibiting deficits in plasma volume and red blood cell volume (Fu et al., 2010; Raj et al., 2005; Sheldon et al., 2015; Stewart et al., 2006a).”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): State of the science and clinical care from a 2019 National Institutes of Health Expert Consensus Meeting - Part 1 (2021) · cites this paper as Sheldon et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“Patients with POTS have a high prevalence of chronic fatigue (48-77%) and of CFS (17-23%) [33;8].”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome: beyond orthostatic intolerance (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Sympathetic denervation obstructs compensatory vascular constriction during upright posture, allowing blood to pool in the splanchnic vasculature and lower extremities [7;43;8]. The resulting decrease in venous return leads to the sympathetic activation and tachycardia of POTS.”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome: beyond orthostatic intolerance (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Vasovagal syncope and POTS overlap clinically, and both diagnoses may be appropriate for a given patient [8].”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome: beyond orthostatic intolerance (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Propranolol is a HRS Class IIb recommendation [8].”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome: beyond orthostatic intolerance (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The natural history of POTS is not clear, but it does not appear to increase the risk of mortality [8].”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome: beyond orthostatic intolerance (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Increasing parasympathetic tone with pyridostigmine can also curtail HR in POTS [65] (HRS Class IIb) [8].”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome: beyond orthostatic intolerance (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Central sympatholytics (e.g. clonidine and methyldopa) can also be used to decrease sympathetic tone in patients with prominent hyperadrenergic features, but might produce drowsiness and worsening of the mental clouding [19] (HRS Class IIb) [8].”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome: beyond orthostatic intolerance (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Fludrocortisone is a HRS Class IIb recommendation [8].”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome: beyond orthostatic intolerance (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Midodrine is a HRS Class IIb recommendation in POTS [8].”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome: beyond orthostatic intolerance (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The HRS cautions against their use in POTS (HRS Class III) [8].”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome: beyond orthostatic intolerance (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Fludrocortisone, a synthetic aldosterone analog that causes sodium retention, is considered the mainstay pharmacologic agent for volume expansion in patients with orthostatic intolerance and hypotension (68).”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: mechanisms and new therapies (2020) · cites this paper as [68]
In the citing paper
“excluding other causes of sinus tachycardia including acute physiological stimuli (e.g.panic attacks, pain, exercise), dietary influences (e.g.caffeine, alcohol), medications (e.g.sympathomimetics, anticholinergics, rebound effects of β-blocker withdrawal), and other medical conditions”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome – Diagnosis, physiology, and prognosis (2018) · cites this paper as Sheldon et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“Approximately 50% of POTS patients are reported to exhibit a hyperadrenergic phenotype characterized by similar excessive orthostatic tachycardia, standing plasma norepinephrine ≥600 pg/mL, an increase in systolic BP ≥10 mm Hg, or symptoms of sympathetic activation”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome – Diagnosis, physiology, and prognosis (2018) · cites this paper as Sheldon et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome that has gained increasing interest over the past few decades due to its increasing prevalence and clinical impact on health-related quality of life.POTS is clinically characterized by sustained excessive tachycardia upon standing that occurs in the absence of significant orthostatic hypotension and other medical conditions”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome – Diagnosis, physiology, and prognosis (2018) · cites this paper as Sheldon et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“in the absence of sustained orthostatic hypotension (drop in BP > 20/10 mm Hg)”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome – Diagnosis, physiology, and prognosis (2018) · cites this paper as Sheldon et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“with symptoms of orthostatic intolerance for at least 6 months that are relieved by recumbence”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome – Diagnosis, physiology, and prognosis (2018) · cites this paper as Sheldon et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“a sustained increase in HR of at least 30 bpm within 10 min of assuming the upright posture (often with absolute upright HR ≥ 120 bpm)”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome – Diagnosis, physiology, and prognosis (2018) · cites this paper as Sheldon et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“The minimal requirements to detect POTS on initial evaluation are a detailed medical history, physical examination with orthostatic vitals, and a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome – Diagnosis, physiology, and prognosis (2018) · cites this paper as Sheldon et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“While there is limited data on natural history, POTS is thought to reflect a chronic condition that is not associated with significant mortality (Sheldon et al., 2015).”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome – Diagnosis, physiology, and prognosis (2018) · cites this paper as Sheldon et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“A number of treatment options have been proposed in POTS but their efficacy in the more severe forms is limited and often questioned.2,7”
From Antiadrenergic autoimmunity in postural tachycardia syndrome (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Its onset may follow an acute infection or vaccination but more commonly appears without antecedent causative events.2,6”
From Antiadrenergic autoimmunity in postural tachycardia syndrome (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Both POTS and IST share abnormal sinus tachycardia tendency, and differ in regard to resting heart rate control that is usually preserved in POTS but not in IST.2”
From Antiadrenergic autoimmunity in postural tachycardia syndrome (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“For some of these comorbidities, the estimated prevalence rates for POTS patients are higher than those reported in the general population 1, 23, 24, 25, 26.”
From The face of postural tachycardia syndrome – insights from a large cross‐sectional online community‐based survey (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“These criteria were subsequently endorsed by major international neurologic, autonomic and cardiologic societies with slight modifications [1,3,4]”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: clinical presentation, aetiology and management (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“The syndrome affects younger individuals, with a distinct predominance of women (%80%) [3,5].”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: clinical presentation, aetiology and management (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“These symptoms are not directly related to the observed haemodynamic disorders [3,5,7,20,35].”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: clinical presentation, aetiology and management (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor.”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: clinical presentation, aetiology and management (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“there are no Class I recommendations to date [3]”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: clinical presentation, aetiology and management (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“the only Class IIA recommendations are exercise training against chronic symptoms and acute saline infusion in decompensated POTS [3] both with positive effects on plasma volume [72].”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: clinical presentation, aetiology and management (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“However, the overall effects of pharmacological therapy are modest and the most symptomatic patients remain severely affected by the disease even if combination of different drugs is applied [3,71].”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: clinical presentation, aetiology and management (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Centrally acting a2-adrenoreceptor agonist with overall sympatholytic effect.”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: clinical presentation, aetiology and management (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“It may be effective in 'hypovolaemic' subtype and low-BP phenotype with pronounced orthostatic intolerance.”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: clinical presentation, aetiology and management (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Among Class IIB recommendations are increased fluid and salt intake, midodrine, beta-blockers, fludrocortisone, pyridostigmine, clonidine and alpha-methyldopa [3].”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: clinical presentation, aetiology and management (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“One of the few pharmacological agents positively tested in placebo-controlled studies for orthostatic hypotension.”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: clinical presentation, aetiology and management (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“as opposed to inappropriate sinus tachycardia, in POTS the tachycardia occurs gradually moving from supine to upright position in the absence of orthostatic hypotension.93”
From European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE) (2017) · cites this paper as [93]
In the citing paper
“This study provides solid data to support the recommendations for increased dietary sodium intake in POTS (3, 4).”
From Effect of High Dietary Sodium Intake in Patients With Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“A high sodium diet (10–12 g NaCl/day equivalent to 170–205 mEq or mmoles sodium/day) and increased water intake (2–3L/day) are often prescribed to expand plasma volume in patients (3, 4, 10).”
From Effect of High Dietary Sodium Intake in Patients With Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“The 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement gives a class IIb recommendation for 24-hour Holter monitor, exercise testing, autonomic and tilt table testing for confirmation of both IST and POTS diagnosis.49”
From Sinus Tachycardia: a Multidisciplinary Expert Focused Review (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“While the rapidity and pattern of the heart rate increase can be somewhat variable, most centers use an increase of at least 30 bpm within 10 minutes of upright tilt (without drop in blood pressure) to be diagnostic for POTS in patients aged 19 or older, though a longer duration to onset has also been described49,92.”
From Sinus Tachycardia: a Multidisciplinary Expert Focused Review (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“Clinically, ‘Idiopathic sinus tachycardia’ comprises two principal diagnostic categories, POTS and IST.49,50,75,167,170”
From Sinus Tachycardia: a Multidisciplinary Expert Focused Review (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“Exercise is an HRS Class IIA indication for POTS but remains a target of study49,50,125,170,173; its value in IST is unknown.49,50,125”
From Sinus Tachycardia: a Multidisciplinary Expert Focused Review (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“Similarly, exercise training has also proven effective for physical reconditioning and lessening episodes of sinus tachycardia triggered by hemodynamic, postural, and/or physical stressors in patients with autonomic nervous system conditions and no underlying familial or personal history of heart disease49,185,192,195,196.”
From Sinus Tachycardia: a Multidisciplinary Expert Focused Review (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“The two most common forms of sinus tachycardia for which the underlying condition is not well understood are POTS 49,50,170 and IST49,55.”
From Sinus Tachycardia: a Multidisciplinary Expert Focused Review (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“Since these IST patients have a generally benign prognosis and only a very narrow group of patients likely benefit from invasive management, sinus node modification, surgical ablation, and sympathetic denervation are not recommended (Class III recommendation) as routine intervention for IST.49”
From Sinus Tachycardia: a Multidisciplinary Expert Focused Review (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 3: Vasovagal Syncope Definition > Pacemaker Treatment
“A small, single-blind randomized trial reported that permanent cardiac pacing greatly reduced syncope burden in young children, with frequent syncope associated with documented asystole.142”
§ 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope > Section 4: Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope in the Young > Treatment of Children with Vasovagal Syncope or POTS
“Finally, a small, double-blind study reported that pacing improved symptoms in very young patients with frequent vasovagal syncope.142”
Citations
Cites
Developed in collaboration with, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Heart Failure Association (HFA), and Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), societies, E. B. T. F., European Society of Emergency Medicine (EuSEM), European Federation of Internal Medicine (EFIM), European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS), American Geriatrics Society (AGS), European Neurological Society (ENS), et al. (2009) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp298 · Cited by 2,040
Self-citationFreeman, R., Wieling, W., Axelrod, F. B., Benditt, D. G., Benarroch, E., Biaggioni, I., Cheshire, W. P., Chelimsky, T., Cortelli, P., Gibbons, C. H., et al. (2011) · Clinical Autonomic Research · doi:10.1007/s10286-011-0119-5 · Cited by 1,697
Self-citationFreeman, R., Wieling, W., Axelrod, F. B., Benditt, D. G., Benarroch, E., Biaggioni, I., Cheshire, W. P., Chelimsky, T., Cortelli, P., Gibbons, C. H., et al. (2011) · Autonomic Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.autneu.2011.02.004 · Cited by 1,243
Self-citationBlomstrom-Lundqvist (2003) · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000091380.04100.84 · Cited by 955
Self-citationRossi, P., Andriesse, G. I., Oey, P. L., Wieneke, G. H., Roelofs, J. M. M., & Akkermans, L. M. A. (1998) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0022-510x(98)00276-7 · Cited by 767
Blomström‐Lundqvist, C., Scheinman, M. M., Aliot, E., Alpert, J. S., Calkins, H. G., Camm, A. J., Campbell, W. B., Haines, D. E., Kück, K., Lerman, B. B., et al. (2003) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.013 · Cited by 684
Self-citationIdiopathic postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: An attenuated form of acute pandysautonomia?
Schondorf, R., & Low, P. A. (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.1_part_1.132 · Cited by 548
Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: the Mayo clinic experience
Thieben, M. J., Sandroni, P., Sletten, D. M., Benrud-Larson, L. M., Fealey, R. D., Vernino, S., Low, P. A., Lennon, V. A., & Shen, W.-K. (2007) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/s0025-6196(11)61027-6 · Cited by 516 · cited 1×
“The symptoms associated with POTS are those that occur with standing, such as lightheadedness and palpitations; not associated with particular postures, such as bloating, nausea, diarrhea, and abdominal pain; and systemic, such as fatigue, sleep disturbance, and migraine headaches.(7) The standing (or orthostatic) hea…”
BackgroundSelf-citationConnolly, S. J., Sheldon, R., Thorpe, K. E., Roberts, R. S., Ellenbogen, K. A., Wilkoff, B. L., Morillo, C., Gent, M., & for the VPS II Investigators (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.17.2224 · Cited by 500
Self-citationThe North American vasovagal pacemaker study (VPS)
Connolly, S., Sheldon, R., Roberts, R., & Gent, M. (1999) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00549-x · Cited by 474
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Tani, 1999, Splanchnic and systemic circulation in the postural tachycardia syndrome, Clin Auton Res, 9, 231
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brugada, J., Katritsis, D. G., Arbelo, E., Arribas, F., Bax, J. J., Blomström‐Lundqvist, C., Calkins, H. G., Corrado, D., Deftereos, S. G., Diller, G., et al. (2019) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz467 · Cited by 1,312
Self-citationKusumoto, F. M., Schoenfeld, M. H., Barrett, C., Edgerton, J. R., Ellenbogen, K. A., Gold, M. R., Goldschlager, N. F., Hamilton, R. M., Joglar, J. A., Kim, R. J., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.044 · Cited by 1,008
Autonomic dysfunction in ‘long COVID’: rationale, physiology and management strategies
Dani, M., Dirksen, A., Taraborrelli, P., Torocastro, M., Panagopoulos, D., Sutton, R., & Lim, P. B. (2020) · Clinical Medicine · doi:10.7861/clinmed.2020-0896 · Cited by 769
Self-citationKusumoto, F. M., Schoenfeld, M. H., Barrett, C., Edgerton, J. R., Ellenbogen, K. A., Gold, M. R., Goldschlager, N. F., Hamilton, R. M., Joglar, J. A., Kim, R. J., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000628 · Cited by 603
Page, R. L., Joglar, J. A., Caldwell, M. A., Calkins, H., Conti, J. B., Deal, B. J., Estes, N. A. M., Field, M. E., Goldberger, Z. D., Hammill, S. C., et al. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000311 · Cited by 595
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheldon, R. S., Grubb, B. P., Olshansky, B., Shen, W.-K., Calkins, H., Brignole, M., Raj, S. R., Krahn, A. D., Morillo, C. A., Stewart, J. M., Sutton, R., Sandroni, P., Friday, K. J., Hachul, D. T., Cohen, M. I., Lau, D. H., Mayuga, K. A., Moak, J. P., Sandhu, R. K., & Kanjwal, K.
- Affiliations
- Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta (CA)
- University of Toledo (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Mayo Clinic Hospital (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Presidio Ospedaliero (IT)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Population Health Research Institute (CA)
- New York Medical College (US)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Children's National (US)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Central Michigan University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sheldon, Robert S.
- ORCID
- Sheldon, Robert S.
- Grubb, Blair P.
- Olshansky, Brian
- Shen, Win-Kuang
- Calkins, Hugh
- Brignole, Michele
- Raj, Satish R.
- Krahn, Andrew D.
- Morillo, Carlos A.
- Stewart, Julian M.
- Sutton, Richard
- Sandroni, Paola
- Hachul, Denise Tessariol
- Cohen, Mitchell I.
- Lau, Dennis H.
- Mayuga, Kenneth A.
- Moak, Jeffrey P.
- Sandhu, Roopinder K.
- Kanjwal, Khalil
- Venue
- Heart Rhythm
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e41-e63
- ISSN
- 1547-5271 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5267948
- OpenAlex
- W2133700167
- Semantic Scholar
- e7704e81a5f78e05ca5c0de6751c9bcff47cc020
- Cited by
- 1,013
- References
- 161
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 21
- FWCI
- 70.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Heart Rhythm (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- American Heart Association
- Heart Rhythm Society
- University of Pennsylvania
- Cleveland Clinic
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated
- Impulse Dynamics
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- St. Jude Medical
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL112736, R01HL074873)
- Biosense Webster
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, vasovagal syncope, diagnosis, treatment, autonomic dysfunction, heart rate variability, tilt table test
- MeSH terms
- Child, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Societies, Medical, Tachycardia, Sinus, Syncope, Vasovagal, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review