Cited by 250Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Sport practice and the risk of lone atrial fibrillation: a case-control study

Elosua, Roberto, Arquer, Andreu, Mont, Lluís, Sambola, Antonia, Molina, Lluís, García-Morán, Emilio, Brugada, Josep, Marrugat, Jaume·2006·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Lone atrial fibrillation (LAF) is characterized by the presence of atrial fibrillation in the absence of structural heart disease or other identifiable cause of arrhythmia. In a recent study, we reported sport practice to be more frequent in LAF patients than in the general population. The aim of the study was to determine the association between sport practice and the prevalence of LAF in men.Methods An age-matched case-control study was designed. Cases were identified from consecutive patients who attended an outpatient clinic; 51 men with LAF were included, 20 of them with vagal characteristics. Controls were selected from the general population (n=109). A questionnaire to assess former and current sport practice and the number of lifetime hours of sport practice was administered. Conditional logistic regression was used for statistical analysis.Results The proportion of patients with LAF who reported current sport practice (31%) was higher than that observed in controls (14%). In the logistic regression, current practice of sport was associated with a higher prevalence of LAF (OR=3.13; 95% CI: 1.39-7.05). The practice of more than 1500 lifetime hours of sport appears to be the threshold for the observed association. Current practice of sport with a lifetime practice greater than 1500 h was associated with LAF (OR=2.87; 95% CI: 1.20-6.91).Conclusion In men, the combination of current and prolonged lifetime sport practice is associated with higher risk of LAF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.05.020

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elosua, R., Arquer, A., Mont, L., Sambola, A., Molina, L., García-Morán, E., Brugada, J., & Marrugat, J.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
108
Issue
3
Pages
332-337
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062319987
Cited by
250
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
lone atrial fibrillation, sports practice, physical activity, prevalence, men, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Atrial Fibrillation, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Sports, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review