Cited by 181Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

High dose and long-term statin therapy accelerate coronary artery calcification

Henein, Michael, Granåsen, Gabriel, Wiklund, Urban, Schmermund, Axel, Guerci, Alan, Erbel, Raimund, Raggi, Paolo·2015·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background In randomized clinical trials statins and placebo treated patients showed the same degree of coronary artery calcium (CAC) progression. We reanalyzed data from two clinical trials to further investigate the time and dose dependent effects of statins on CAC. Additionally, we investigated whether CAC progression was associated with incident cardiovascular events. Methods and results Data were pooled from two clinical trials: St. Francis Heart Study (SFHS) (419 and 432 patients treated with placebo and 20 mg atorvastatin daily, respectively) and EBEAT Study (164 and 179 patients respectively treated with 10 mg and 80 mg atorvastatin daily). CAC scores were assessed at baseline, 2 years and 4-6 years in SFHS; in EBEAT they were measured at baseline and 12 months. After a short-term follow-up (12 to 24 months) placebo and low dose atorvastatin showed a similar CAC increase, although 80 mg/daily atorvastatin increased CAC an additional 12-14% over placebo (p Conclusions Despite a greater CAC increase with high dose and long-term statin therapy, events did not occur more frequently in statin treated patients. This suggests that CAC growth under treatment with statins represents plaque repair rather than continuing plaque expansion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.02.072

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henein, M., Granåsen, G., Wiklund, U., Schmermund, A., Guerci, A., Erbel, R., & Raggi, P.
Affiliations
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Cardiovascular Center Bethanien (DE)
  • St. Francis Hospital (US)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Raggi, Paolo
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
184
Pages
581-586
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000313374
Cited by
181
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 4
FWCI
15.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
statins, atorvastatin, coronary artery calcification, coronary artery calcium progression, high-intensity statin therapy, dose-dependent effects, long-term statin therapy, cardiovascular events
MeSH terms
Aged, Coronary Artery Disease, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Disease Progression, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Vascular Calcification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review