Cited by 112Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Cortical thickness predicts the first onset of major depression in adolescence

Open access
Foland‐Ross, Lara C., Sacchet, Matthew D., Prasad, Gautam, Gilbert, Brooke, Thompson, Paul M., Gotlib, Ian H.·2015·International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience

Abstract

Given the increasing prevalence of Major Depressive Disorder and recent advances in preventative treatments for this disorder, an important challenge in pediatric neuroimaging is the early identification of individuals at risk for depression. We examined whether machine learning can be used to predict the onset of depression at the individual level. Thirty‐three never‐disordered adolescents (10–15 years old) underwent structural MRI. Participants were followed for 5 years to monitor the emergence of clinically significant depressive symptoms. We used support vector machines (SVMs) to test whether baseline cortical thickness could reliably distinguish adolescents who develop depression from adolescents who remained free of any Axis I disorder. Accuracies from subsampled cross‐validated classification were used to assess classifier performance. Baseline cortical thickness correctly predicted the future onset of depression with an overall accuracy of 70% (69% sensitivity, 70% specificity; p = 0.021). Examination of SVM feature weights indicated that the right medial orbitofrontal, right precentral, left anterior cingulate, and bilateral insular cortex contributed most strongly to this classification. These findings indicate that cortical gray matter structure can predict the subsequent onset of depression. An important direction for future research is to elucidate mechanisms by which these anomalies in gray matter structure increase risk for developing this disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2015.07.007

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a 5-year prospective study of never-depressed daughters aged 10-15 with a mother with depression, lower cortical thickness in the right medial orbitofrontal/ventromedial prefrontal cortex and larger perigenual anterior cingulate cortex cortical thickness emerged as two of the top three neural features predicting the first episode of major depressive disorder.

    “Specifically, lower cortical thickness in the right medial OFC/vmPFC (but larger pgACC cortical thickness) emerged as two of the top three neural features predicting the first episode of MDD [87].”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [87]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. C. Miller J.P. Hamilton M.D. Sacchet I.H. Gotlib(in press)A quantitative whole‐brain meta‐analysis of emotion processing in adolescent Major Depressive Disorder.JAMA Psychiatry.
  2. Murray C., 1996, The Global Burden of Disease
  3. Nolen‐Hoeksema S., 2010, Handbook of Depression, 386

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foland‐Ross, L. C., Sacchet, M. D., Prasad, G., Gilbert, B., Thompson, P. M., & Gotlib, I. H.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Foland‐Ross, Lara C.
Venue
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-24
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
125-131
ISSN
  • 0736-5748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-474X
OpenAlex
W1195446513
Cited by
109
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH74849, MH090617, MH020016)
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Science Foundation (0801700, DGE‐1147470)
  • Hope for Depression Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
major depressive disorder, adolescent depression, cortical thickness, gray matter structure, medial orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, precentral cortex, structural MRI, support vector machine, risk prediction, neuroimaging biomarkers
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adolescent, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review